Brasher
Premium Platinum
FCS spring football is on ESPN right now if you're after a fix. North Dakota V James Madison
For the life of me, I can't quite connect why I am interested in North Dakota college football all of a sudden.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: St Kilda v Western Bulldogs - 7:30PM Thu
Squiggle tips Saints at 51% chance -- What's your tip? -- Team line-ups »
FCS spring football is on ESPN right now if you're after a fix. North Dakota V James Madison
Who blinks first.... Pack front office or A Rod?
Go to the Raiders mate!!!! Franchise in Vegas baby!!!!
Just on Rodgers , Denver absolutely makes the most sense, you'd assume the Packers would suddenly want some pieces and weapons for Jordan Love in return. Wonder which ones Denver would be willing to give up?
You'd suspect one of Sutton, Juedy or Fant would need to be involved.
All 3 and 3 firsts start the conversation
lmfaoAll 3 and 3 firsts start the conversation
The whole no one to throw to is such a beat up anyway. You have Rodgers. You literally don't need star receiversFor giggles wouldn't it be funny if that trade happened, Rodgers was left with noone to throw to and Denver uses those picks to trade up for QB in 2022.
The whole no one to throw to is such a beat up anyway. You have Rodgers. You literally don't need star receivers
Green Bay hasn't been losing all those playoff games because of their elite offence, but because their D can't stop a nose bleed. So now why is everyone making a fuss about them not drafting receivers in the 1st rnd? Makes no sense
Assuming Rodgers stays
AFCN
1. Baltimore (3)
2. Cleveland (5)
3. Pittsburgh
4. Cincinnati
AFCS
1. Indianapolis (4)
2. Tennessee
3. Jacksonville
4. Houston
AFCE
1. Buffalo (2)
2. New England (6)
3. Miami
4. New York
AFCW
1. Kansas City (1)
2. Los Angeles (7)
3. Denver
4. Las Vegas
NFCN
1. Green Bay (3)
2. Minnesota (6)
3. Chicago
4. Detroit
NFCS
1. Tampa Bay (1)
2. New Orleans
3. Carolina
4. Atlanta
NFCE
1. Dallas (4)
2. Washington
3. New York
4. Philadelphia
NFCW
1. San Francisco (2)
2. Los Angeles (5)
3. Arizona (7)
4. Seattle
About even. I think both close to .500, just Cowboys easier division and the Seahawks defense has remarkably got even worse IMO. It could be all time bad this year. Although I am hesitant to put Wilson at the bottom of the division, just thought the Cardinals had an easier slate of opponentsMiami pushing Pat's but I like this.
Question...more wins Seattle or Dallas?
The whole no one to throw to is such a beat up anyway. You have Rodgers. You literally don't need star receivers
Green Bay hasn't been losing all those playoff games because of their elite offence, but because their D can't stop a nose bleed. So now why is everyone making a fuss about them not drafting receivers in the 1st rnd? Makes no sense
Sutton is better anyway, don't need himPretty sure Adams is out of contract next year , perhaps he follows Aaron to Denver a year later?
offtherails9 trigger warning.
Sutton is better anyway, don't need him
Assuming Rodgers stays
AFCN
1. Baltimore (3)
2. Cleveland (5)
3. Pittsburgh
4. Cincinnati
AFCS
1. Indianapolis (4)
2. Tennessee
3. Jacksonville
4. Houston
AFCE
1. Buffalo (2)
2. New England (6)
3. Miami
4. New York
AFCW
1. Kansas City (1)
2. Los Angeles (7)
3. Denver
4. Las Vegas
NFCN
1. Green Bay (3)
2. Minnesota (6)
3. Chicago
4. Detroit
NFCS
1. Tampa Bay (1)
2. New Orleans
3. Carolina
4. Atlanta
NFCE
1. Dallas (4)
2. Washington
3. New York
4. Philadelphia
NFCW
1. San Francisco (2)
2. Los Angeles (5)
3. Arizona (7)
4. Seattle
This is ADP Panther bias at its finest.0% chance we finish below N.O ....our schedule is soft as.
This is ADP Panther bias at its finest.
I only had them like 1 game better. I kind of think highly of the Panthers and want them to do well but felt like I was being biased and didn't want to get ahead of myself (being serious)Hardly , I think we finish 8-8 or 9-7.
Can't see the Saints having a better record that?
I only had them like 1 game better. I kind of think highly of the Panthers and want them to do well but felt like I was being biased and didn't want to get ahead of myself (being serious)
lmfao
The whole no one to throw to is such a beat up anyway. You have Rodgers. You literally don't need star receivers
Green Bay hasn't been losing all those playoff games because of their elite offence, but because their D can't stop a nose bleed. So now why is everyone making a fuss about them not drafting receivers in the 1st rnd? Makes no sense
Averaged 27.5 pts per game in 4 playoff games last 2 years... with games against the 3 best defenses to go around in that time, '19 9ers, '20 Rams, '20 BucsLol, is there even a precedent for a similar player being traded? Honestly not far off what GB would be asking.
Spot on, it's a dumb brain take to continue to say that sh*t. Rodgers wants the team better, drafting a CB makes the team better.