So relatively California with 60,000 deaths we would of had 9000.
Not remotely realistic considering population density and health care systems borders.
But mathematically we could say that.
But we could say about 80% of people that died here were in aged care, 46,000 Victorians are in aged care do you think it would be realistic after lets just say 2000 lol died noone would take any measures in the aged care system?
Would that really happen?
Then you've got to consider that California actually had lockdowns?
Dunno. Someone's just going to have to make up a number.
I'm not sure what you are trying to say? That we wait until we get 2,000 deaths in aged care and then bring some measures in? Or just lockdown the aged care sector and it's a free for all with everyone else? You do realise that the people that work in aged care have lives as well outisde their work?
Who know's what the actual number would have been but it would have been far higher than what we've experienced. Surely you concede that?





