- May 20, 2017
- 5,770
- 9,469
- AFL Club
- West Coast
Sounds like an old man!?!?!
Taking it week to week really doesn't sound good at all. But if he's named I'm probably taking him.
Trades 2021 Round 10 Fantasy Trades
- Thread starter happy_eagle
- Start date
- Tagged users None
- Status
Sounds like an old man!?!?!
Taking it week to week really doesn't sound good at all. But if he's named I'm probably taking him.
- Sep 7, 2009
- 5,892
- 5,987
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
- Other Teams
- Real Madrid, Man City, GS Warriors
Thoughts on my future trade plans.
Thinking of Gulden > Harmes via Hind DPP and Bergman > A Rookie
I'd have thought he'd have a lower break even than 71.
At his price, former premo type, he's better than a rookie on field so an easy upgrade.
I just hope he can hang in there til his rd14 bye and make a small bit of cash. One early injury with that break even could prove very costly.
- Sep 8, 2013
- 5,616
- 9,103
- AFL Club
- Richmond
It’s either Warner to Dusty or ROB to Darcy for me. Big decision to makeDarcy
as an Adelaide fan, what’s gone so wrong with ROB? Coming off 96 and 108 seasons and now a spud?
WaynesWorld19
Moderator
- Moderator
- #180
Definitely ROB to Darcy ......Dusty i don't like in Fantasy period, just no consistency till after his bye ....plus Warners ave is only 7 pts lower than Dusty
I could easily go Warner to Dusty ..Powell to Heeney, but whilst sounding good on paper, i don't think that's the play
As a Crow supporter, i'd drop ROB immediately ....that's how bad he is ...Tracy, injury prone, but worth the risk
ROB simply hasn't any competition for his spot .....his weapon is his marking, not rucking, but he's now **** at rucking and marking .....getting caught between contests, and when he does get to a contest, he's not going for marks with any real intent & vigour
Last edited:
WaynesWorld19
Moderator
- Moderator
- #181
Trades this week ......I'm stuffed if I know
I know I want Kelly in for Powell ......it's the how that has me stumped
Also looked at my Bye structure for the first time .......OMG what an ugly sight, but fixable I hope
I know I want Kelly in for Powell ......it's the how that has me stumped
Also looked at my Bye structure for the first time .......OMG what an ugly sight, but fixable I hope
Why are people dumping Ziebell? Sure, he hasn't gone 140+ the last 3 weeks but he's still one of the better forward options...have people got that many luxury trades? Or is it a bye structure issue?
Breakeven of 146 so will start decreasing in value. If you don’t think he’ll be a keeper than it makes sense to trade him now before he starts losing money. That and an unfavourable buy
***if you have no other forced trades
TedDougChris
🏆 🦍
- Mar 10, 2007
- 52,545
- 98,134
- AFL Club
- Western Bulldogs
- Other Teams
- Charlton Athletic, Roys FFC
extra cash generated if you think he is likely to drop in price. You could pocket (guessing) 150k to Jelly and then upgrade Powell to someone at a similar price. So one rookie and a premium to two premiums
- Oct 16, 2015
- 24,279
- 30,558
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Mar 11, 2019
- 15,243
- 23,834
- AFL Club
- Geelong
Who are the 6 forwards that will be better from this point?
I can see a couple but not six so you are getting rid of a top 6 for what exactly.
If your bye structure is ****ed and you need to offload a round 12 player i can see it otherwise nope.
Zevon
Moderator
- Moderator
- #187
You’re spot on that the top 6 forwards are anybody’s guess and nobody is screaming pick me, but I’m not sure that matters. If I had Ziebell and even the sniff of a luxury trade I’d drop him down to a Josh Kelly (would even consider a Dusty or a Billings) purely as a cash grab. Sure there’s no guarantees they’ll be top 6 but even so you’re probably getting a player that will average similar to Ziebell but you’re making 150-200k in doing so. It’s a different way to make money than the traditional rookie up-down model but it’s equally as effective. Jump off Ziebell while he’s at his highest point, make a nice bit of cash for little/no drop in scoring. It’s the buy low sell high theory in action
- Mar 11, 2019
- 15,243
- 23,834
- AFL Club
- Geelong
I can see the upside and if you have the luxury to do it. It may well work.
We all know you can't win if you don't risk something. E.g Me getting Tex at the right time (maybe 1 week late) and jumping of at the perfect time.
And by the way if you have the luxury to do it can i have your team lol
Should have taken him up on the offer to change teams...Hahaha I said IFI don’t even have Ziebell letalone anything resembling luxury in my team
- Mar 11, 2019
- 15,243
- 23,834
- AFL Club
- Geelong
My rabble barely scrapped past 1900 last week don't think they want any of itShould have taken him up on the offer to change teams...
Given I'm forced to give up Marshall instead of being able to do 1 up and 1 down as planned I would like to go Marshall and Powell to 2 fallen premos so I still gain a premo this week.
Who are the 2 to go for with $1.315 to spend. Already have Dusty/Jelly/Hall.
I can probably only go 1 per position. i.e. couldnt go Daniel/Ridley, could only get 1.
Who are the 2 to go for with $1.315 to spend. Already have Dusty/Jelly/Hall.
I can probably only go 1 per position. i.e. couldnt go Daniel/Ridley, could only get 1.
Daniel & Fyfe?
Is Daniel a better option than Ridley? I was currently sitting Ridley & Fyfe actually while playing around with it.
Brouch is probably the other one instead of Fyfe, the injury concerns me that whilst he might play he could be terrible.
This could be a rather important point.
I've held Flynn at R3 for this reason, as well as him still having plenty of cash to earn.
My current setup after this week's trades is:
15 Keepers
Jordon and RCD that can hang about for a while
6 rookies still earning growth
4 ready to be cashed out
3 spuds
The hope is to add four more keepers by the end of the byes, which would mean only one spot left on field, although at the current rate, Jordon is actually a keeper.
- Sep 5, 2013
- 6,481
- 10,970
- AFL Club
- Carlton
- Other Teams
- Western Bulldogs
WaynesWorld19
Moderator
- Moderator
- #197
I've heard this a bit re Ziebell, but I'm not understanding ......if Ziebell is a keeper, which I think he is, why downgrade him when there's a paucity of FWD's .....moreover his DPP status is invaluable IMO
Don't mind the buy low sell high theory in DEF and MIDS this year ......just not the FWD's
- Mar 20, 2007
- 28,259
- 24,780
- AFL Club
- West Coast
- Thread starter
- #198
There has been a subtle shift in Norths gameplan in the past few weeks and Hall seems more of a target for rebounding than Ziebell. Don't think Ziebell has that high ceiling with Hall in there.
Ziebell is more expensive than Merrett, Oliver and Tom Mitchell. Reckon those 3 will perform better from here out.
Looks like Ridley has lost a heap of his kick in duties to Redman which is a bummer
WaynesWorld19
Moderator
- Moderator
- #200
Ziebell is the stay at home DEF General, in the Ridley mould .....Hall, the run & carry player in the Zilliams / Kade Simpson mould of HB
Think they both have a good fantasy role .....and most teams won't worry about tagging, or putting time into them, being a bottom side
Last edited:
- Status
