- Aug 18, 2018
- 38,868
- 69,371
- AFL Club
- Geelong
Ah whoops carry on. I agree sels is too slow for the wingWe are talking about Selwood
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Ah whoops carry on. I agree sels is too slow for the wingWe are talking about Selwood
Richmond don't have to beat Richmond. West coast didn't have to either.On 2 KPF, WCE won a GF with it and Richmond have won 2.
Apologies if this is overly negative on Cameron, it's not meant to be. I posted the below elsewhere in regards to the cats chucking it ask in the get Jez:
With two KPFs in the wet we lose a substantial amount of forward half defensive pressure. Last night we lost the game in the middle while our forward mix was mostly right.
Where we and other sides have held ground on Richmond is having strong defensive efforts in f50 otherwise you get slaughtered on the rebound.
I think the MC would be looking at last night and thinking Cameron would have made us actively worse not better.
So what's the cats strategy going forward?
Well on paper they'd be copying west coast 2018 for 2021. Not only has this not beaten Richmond at the MCG but is the polar opposite of what the cats have done since Richmond became the dominant team.
To take advantage of this they need fast ball movement. They currently do not have a system that generates consistently fast ball movement.
It's also debatable whether this is the right strategy for a side that plays at KP. Where it's easier to sag off your man to spoil and so you need good ground level work.
Now bearing in mind that the cats have been chasing Cameron for years as a Hawkins replacement, unofficial offers etc will have been made long in advance of this year.
Those unofficial offers would have been made in a context where Hawkins was seen to be either trailing off the end of his career or outright retiring this year.
That brings us to second aspect here which is the looming ruck situation at the cats.
With Harry Taylor retiring, barring Sam DeKoning putting on 5kgs of muscle before rd 1 Blitz will shift to FB.
Suddenly Stanley has no back up from Blitz in the ruck anywhere outside d50. Hawkins can help a bit in f50 but not through the middle.
We would normally look to Sav as a ruck forward chopping out Stanley but if we are playing Jez + Hawk + Sav then we would have no f50 defensive pressure at all and we'd be really badly exposed on the rebound against sides like the Tigers.
So the MC have a problem here. How do they shoehorn 2 KPFs into a playing style designed for 1?
The cats did not plan for this problem.
So to stay in the window they probably need Hawkins to retire or not recruit Jez at all. Because without pressure forwards preventing rebounds they'll get slaughtered by Richmond
So where does that leave the cats?
Jez has asked to get out now so there's no going back.
The cats are in a situation where the value he adds is only really in a post Hawkins world.
That's looking like 2023 now not 2021 and so the timing means that in the first year he truly adds value as KPF half our midfield is retired and he turns 30.
They can't really retire Hawkins after the year he had, they can't trade in Jez and not play him, they can't lose Blitz ruck work and not play Sav.
So while the value of Jez in the general market is high, any trade for him has a high probability of closing the premiership window for 2021.
Scott might make it work but there have to be wholesale changes to the midfield and its a low probability
So what's a fair trade for Jez if your list of things given up includes your shot at the 2021 premiership?
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Why not? Given he is the president of the AFLPA and the club VC, players clearly respect his leadership.Love Danger but hope we don't give him the captaincy.
Prefer someone like Stewart, maybe Duncan. Then maybe O'Connor in the future.
Bews and Kolo have to be replaced in the backline, they offer absolutely nothing offensively, are probably two of the worst kicks in the entire comp, and their defensive work is vastly overrated, especially when you consider we've already got O'Connor and Henry respectively who are already superior and are still showing signs of development. Any two players who can both provide run and clean disposal to take their spot. Clark a clear replacement for Bews, and what I'd give for a Mackie-type to replace Kolo...
Richmond don't have to beat Richmond. West coast didn't have to either.
Cameron and Hawkins will be an awesome forward line, that's the least of our worries. It's why I'd like some flair and attack off half-back, gives those up the field an open forward half to work in. Only time you get a relatively open forward line is from a centre clearance, or a rebound/turnover. We lack genuine bounce out of the back-half.WCE beat Richmond by 8 goals in 2018 and kicked 20 goals. Darling had 6 and Kennedy 3. Worked then.
How many teams have Kennedy/Darling, Lynch/Riewoldt or Hawkins/Cameron upfront?
I'm not sure where the problem lies having 2 of the best forwards in your team is?
Cameron and Hawkins will be an awesome forward line, that's the least of our worries. It's why I'd like some flair and attack off half-back, gives those up the field an open forward line to work in. Only time you get a relatively open forward line is from a centre clearance, or a rebound/turnover. We lack genuine bounce out of the back-half.
I think we'll need to keep the taller defensive line. Protects from long kicks into f50 and slows up ball movement against usYou've just articulated something that has been nagging at me; If Harry Taylor retires we have an opportunity to redress the top-heavy nature of our defense.
However if we acquire Jeremy Cameronthen we are potentially creating a similar problem in terms of our forward line/ruck division balance, exactly as you have outlined.PLAYERCARDSTART5Jeremy Cameron
- Age
- 32
- Ht
- 196cm
- Wt
- 94kg
- Pos.
- Fwd
CareerSeasonLast 5
- D
- 12.5
- 3star
- K
- 9.0
- 3star
- HB
- 3.4
- 3star
- M
- 5.4
- 5star
- T
- 1.6
- 4star
- G
- 2.6
- 5star
- D
- 10.0
- 3star
- K
- 7.1
- 3star
- HB
- 2.9
- 2star
- M
- 4.6
- 4star
- T
- 2.0
- 3star
- G
- 1.9
- 5star
- D
- 8.2
- 2star
- K
- 5.0
- 2star
- HB
- 3.2
- 3star
- M
- 4.6
- 5star
- T
- 2.4
- 4star
- G
- 2.0
- 5star
PLAYERCARDEND
Agree. And a very good decision maker. Would prefer him to give it away, though. We got up and comers who could do that spot. Retire on top.I expect Selwood will only play 15-16 games next year. He is too slow now. I think forward pocket could be a position as he is a decent kick. So kicking for goal and short kicks in and around 50 might suit. But his lack of pace is a worry. That would be exposed down back on quick forwards.
I think we'll need to keep the taller defensive line. Protects from long kicks into f50 and slows up ball movement against us
The way we play, it must be hell for the tall fowards with 30 players hanging around you. So long as we are treacle slow ball movers, it will remain that way. Be nice to see Clark driving it down.Yep, I agree.
Someone like Clark will be key for us. We need calm and collected, elite ball users out of defense.
It worked for them in west in 2018 and hasn't since.WCE beat Richmond by 8 goals in 2018 and kicked 20 goals. Darling had 6 and Kennedy 3. Worked then.
How many teams have Kennedy/Darling, Lynch/Riewoldt or Hawkins/Cameron upfront?
I'm not sure where the problem lies having 2 of the best forwards in your team is?
The way we play, it must be hell for the tall fowards with 30 players hanging around you. So long as we are treacle slow ball movers, it will remain that way.
It worked for them in west in 2018 and hasn't since.
I mean I appreciate that attacking forward entries with those in there is going to rack up some massive scores.
I just think it's going to leave our backline very exposed if we have to either ruck with Blitz and leave a backline hole, or ruck with Sav/Stanley in combination leaving a f50 defensive hole.
I think with the players we have the back 6 is about right. Taylor out for a ready made DEK would be ideal so we can keep Blitz on the wing/ruck but not sure where he's at. We need a replacement for Hendo for 2022. Maybe Cox or Reid at the draft this year give them a year in the 2s.What's your best back 6 combo CttF?
It's a tough one imo; Henderson and Blicavs are obvious choices, but then again De Koning will need exposure.
Is Henry a 3rd tall defender or can he make the transition to KD? I like his mobility a lot.
Kolodjashnij and Bews have very tough jobs. Honest players. Personally I'd be inclined to persist with Bews, but not with Kolo.
That small defender's role is really niche.
They were clearing it out of the centre quicksmart, and it was like they had 3 Mitch Duncans delivering quickly to their forwards. We dawdle it down the boundary line.It worked for them in west in 2018 and hasn't since.
I mean I appreciate that attacking forward entries with those in there is going to rack up some massive scores.
I just think it's going to leave our backline very exposed if we have to either ruck with Blitz and leave a backline hole, or ruck with Sav/Stanley in combination leaving a f50 defensive hole.
1. Mindfulness mental coach to help the team seize opportunities and keep calmer under pressure so we can kick straight when it matters.
Rest is less important and I’ll post a write up later