Not this year. They may receive one next year if things don't improve though.North will get a PP nothing surer IMO
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: St Kilda v Western Bulldogs - 7:30PM Thu
Squiggle tips Saints at 51% chance -- What's your tip? -- Team line-ups »
Not this year. They may receive one next year if things don't improve though.North will get a PP nothing surer IMO
Old system allowed clubs to rort the system. At least the new system allows a governing body to decide whether a team needs assistance or not. At least without knowing the system guidelines you don’t have the abillity to exploit loopholes etc
Yes, the afl will continually use this to prop up teams such as the Gold Coast and potentially gws, but it won’t give powerhouse clubs that have a few years down the bottom a leg up for more sustained success.
Agree but only if we end up with 1-2 wins or godforbid lessNorth will get a PP nothing surer IMO
what the... how are the poster's thoughts on the pies football talent an indication of racism?Self quote.
I warned everyone these flogs were headed for a collapse. Their culture is a disgrace. Their own players are embarrassed to play for them.
All ur classic racist bigfooty flogs got behind the pies.
Saints a chance.
Yes, swapped it for two mid second rounders which is looking pretty grim.hopefuly pies. also gws have their pick right
Doing away with them all together also solves the problem.
Already enough done to support under performing teams and businesses - make the draft and access to the playing pool as open as possible based on a reverse ladder draft order (and a top 4 lottery, if required).
fair enough as long as all those clubs who've received Priority Picks in the past offer up some sort of compensation in the form of draft picks or salary cap concessions to those clubs who haven't received one yet
Otherwise those clubs who have are at an unfair advantage if the rule stops.
In your case u got Darling & Shuey who have helped set you up for the last decade. So if you say the rule should stop now after you've had a big benefit from it, then there should be compensation for the other clubs
To clarify - ‘Darling and Shuey’ equates to pick 26 and pick 18 at the time - a few years apart (and over 10 years ago..) - so it wasn’t exactly ‘choose your future champion’ stuff, WCE just drafted well. Darling was even drafted in a year where GC pillaged the draft with the majority of first round picks, including the top 3 and a bunch of pre-selections - WCE received pick 4 (Andrew Gaff) despite finishing dead last the season before....and had their ‘compo’ pick shunted down to 26....so come on, as the rule stood at the time, it was hardly a great example of ‘compo picks gone wild’.
Regardless, just because a rule WAS in place - it’s not the same anymore already - doesn’t mean it needs to be ‘awarded’ in perpetuity, that is ridiculous.
You can have Tom Scully, if that helpsfair enough as long as all those clubs who've received Priority Picks in the past offer up some sort of compensation in the form of draft picks or salary cap concessions to those clubs who haven't received one yet
Otherwise those clubs who have are at an unfair advantage if the rule stops.
In your case u got Darling & Shuey who have helped set you up for the last decade. So if you say the rule should stop now after you've had a big benefit from it, then there should be compensation for the other clubs
North for mine.North and Gold Coast and Hawks
To clarify - ‘Darling and Shuey’ equates to pick 26 and pick 18 at the time - a few years apart (and over 10 years ago..) - so it wasn’t exactly ‘choose your future champion’ stuff, WCE just drafted well. Darling was even drafted in a year where GC pillaged the draft with the majority of first round picks, including the top 3 and a bunch of pre-selections - WCE received pick 4 (Andrew Gaff) despite finishing dead last the season before....and had their ‘compo’ pick shunted down to 26....so come on, as the rule stood at the time, it was hardly a great example of ‘compo picks gone wild’.
Regardless, just because a rule WAS in place - it’s not the same anymore already - doesn’t mean it needs to be ‘awarded’ in perpetuity, that is ridiculous.
You can have Tom Scully, if that helps
Chris Judd was a priority pick, so you can add Josh Kennedy into that equation too actually.
rather have Boomer out of retirement !
He’d last a week before SIA are on his tail.