Posts plural
View attachment 1262971
I'm simply saying, we won't pick Rachele .....and I'm not seeing the X-Factor component .....maybe I need a new set of rose colored glasses
My opinion is Rachele should go somewhere #8-#12
Posts plural...and there's more if you want me to put them all up.
Those picks are probably 6-8 and 21 in a much better draft.
I agree, and teams will know the strengths of the drafts.
No worries
Edit: Mutineer beat me to itView attachment 1262971
I'm simply saying, we won't pick Rachele .....and I'm not seeing the X-Factor component .....maybe I need a new set of rose colored glasses
My opinion is Rachele should go somewhere #8-#12
It’s moreso pick 6 + 21 for Phillipou. I reckon we’d offer the same deal to the Bombers, for instance. You’re paying for the specific target, not the pick
And your usually an expert on the use of the search facility...You're slipping Colonel.
What has boobs got to do with it
There's others mate, you were over the top on Rachele, we all get it wrong at times.
I'm not denying that for a minute .....just IMO Callaghan / Andrew plus Rankine this year were the better combo for future success
To be fair, it did feel like we tried to get up to get Callaghan anyway. When we didn't, Rachele was the right call.
The thing is due to Covid in Victoria Rachele really had very limited opportunity to show his wares as a 17 year old or 18 year old.....at the U16's Championships he was rated the best 16 year old in the country by the selection panel winning the Championships M.V.P/ and Vic Country's M.V.P. playing midfield mostly where he generated a shedload of ball.
In an Adelaide conservative way ....MELB current demonstrating aggressive trading strategies to get their targeted player .....we don't do that
You're not blaming the Liberals for that too, are you?
Who ? ....they're a laughing stock todayYou're not blaming the Liberals for that too, are you?
I agree. And when we gave up pick 5 for Rankine people lost their sh*t.
www.zerohanger.com
MELB offering both of their F1 x 2 picks to get into the top 10 this year, has been applauded in some media circles .....it's an interesting debate .....get your targeted player now, worry about your future, when it comes
Seems odd we are keen to hold on to our second but trade Norths, that can only be because we think Norths holds more currency and not that we will finish lower surelyAdelaide emerge as keen suitor for in-demand GWS pick
The Giants are said to have multiple clubs circling one of their early selections.
That's a surprise....Not!Adelaide emerge as keen suitor for in-demand GWS pick
The Giants are said to have multiple clubs circling one of their early selections.
West Australian press have said Ginbey have had multiple chats with them and he's open to joining them and will spoil West coasts party by taking him
I guess so. I'd much rather hold their 2023 2nd than ours but maybe if we can get the right player for it, it won't matter in the long run
Makes heaps of sense for Melbourne. They have no need for a couple more late first rounders, but a top 10 pick could make a difference. Particularly when brought in a year earlier.
