Dr Tigris
Brownlow Medallist
Probably doesn't help us but Crows decline option to nominate Keeler
Possibly gives us a chance - if we think he's worth it
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Probably doesn't help us but Crows decline option to nominate Keeler
Probably doesn't help us but Crows decline option to nominate Keeler
Maybe they're playing the game, by saying they're not nominating him, thinking they can then get him on the cheap if everyone overlooks him.If the Crows don't rate him as being draftable at all, I'd say he's a stronger possibility to slide than media speculation is currently suggesting.
Not really17 men in history have played 250 games for Richmond. Another 16 have played 200. I'm a Gibcus fan but your throwing about of "Player X will play 200/250 games" is willy-nilly-like in its recklessness. If you're not careful someone's going to lose an eye.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
They probably know he wont last until pick #41If the Crows don't rate him as being draftable at all, I'd say he's a stronger possibility to slide than media speculation is currently suggesting.
That makes no sense. By not nominating him they ensure they don’t get him easily on the cheap if he slidesMaybe they're playing the game, by saying they're not nominating him, thinking they can then get him on the cheap if everyone overlooks him.
Hell of a risk of they rate him. Lose nothing by nominating himThey probably know he wont last until pick #41
Was thinking that by suggesting that he is not good enough for them to consider matching in the National draft that other teams may overlook him. Which then means that they could take him at pick 5 in the rookie draft, which then also means they can take 3 kids they may rate around the same level or ahead of him, instead of having to match.That makes no sense. By not nominating him they ensure they don’t get him easily on the cheap if he slides
Hell of a risk of they rate him. Lose nothing by nominating him
I think it’s much more likely that they’ve had a close look at him as a NGA player and don’t think he’s going to be up to it
Doubt other teams fall for that plus if he’s borderline rookie pick and they do nominate him then should he not get drafted they get to rookie him for freeWas thinking that by suggesting that he is not good enough for them to consider matching in the National draft that other teams may overlook him. Which then means that they could take him at pick 5 in the rookie draft, which then also means they can take 3 kids they may rate around the same level or ahead of him, instead of having to match.
Or they didn’t bother because they’re no chance.Maybe they're playing the game, by saying they're not nominating him, thinking they can then get him on the cheap if everyone overlooks him.
Gibcus certainly has a far greater chance of reaching 250 than Ralphsmith.Not really
Alot has changed over the past 10-15 years
How many players had played 300 for Richmond in its history until 2017 ? F. Bourke , J. Dyer , K. Bartlett
Now within 3 years our number will more than double to 7 with Riewoldt , Edwards & Cotchin and possibly Martin in 5 years
We will have 5 players on the bench getting games compared to 2 from years ago , Plus we are going to add Magic round
Also players now are professional players and get paid accordingly and play for 15 years if they are good enough and dont want to retire early
Hope that info doesnt make you lose the other eye
If that was the case then surely they'd still nominate him on the off chance he did make it through.They probably know he wont last until pick #41
I reckon multiple clubs have already told the kid they will be drafting him at a particular pick (and inside 40), He likely has informed crows and they dont bother nominating for him, especially noting they wont have picks deep in the draft and would not want to be in deficit next year if he was still available and a bid came after 40. Crows would be idiotic to take a project KPF late this year and affect next years first pick, especially if they are down the bottom, as what they likely will be.If that was the case then surely they'd still nominate him on the off chance he did make it through.
I interpret not nominating him as them not having any interest at all.
There’s no downside to nominating him though? If a bid comes and Adelaide doesn’t want to cough up then they simply pass on matchingI reckon multiple clubs have already told the kid they will be drafting him at a particular pick (and inside 40), He likely has informed crows and they dont bother nominating for him, especially noting they wont have picks deep in the draft and would not want to be in deficit next year if he was still available and a bid came after 40. Crows would be idiotic to take a project KPF late this year and affect next years first pick, especially if they are down the bottom, as what they likely will be.
Spot on. If they rated him as draftable (even as a rookie) they would have nominated him.There’s no downside to nominating him though? If a bid comes and Adelaide doesn’t want to cough up then they simply pass on matching
So much can change on draft night that they wouldn’t limit themselves like this unless they really don’t rate him
Alternatively, player may told the club he doesnt want to play there lolSpot on. If they rated him as draftable (even as a rookie) they would have nominated him.
Dodged a bullet when the Bombers matched our bid on Eyre in the 2020 draft
Essendon has made a further change to its playing list with Josh Eyre informed that he will not be offered a contract for 2023.
Eyre will have the opportunity to continue pre-season training with the Bombers with the potential of securing a spot as a pre-season supplemental selection period (SSP) signing.
Did well getting MJ and Ryan in 2020 in a shallow draft. Eight players already delisted from the 2nd round after only 2 years on AFL lists
Yet to be proven under pressure. He was like Bambi on skates in that final.
I was big on dropping him before the game. It may have cost us a grand final imo.Every border line selection came back a bit is on the arse. Was one of those games. Dominated for little return and Nank managed to keep picking out Brisbane midfielders between 3 tigers.
Most of us were fairly positive with the side selected going in, so I’m wary of any Harry hindsight’s (not accusing you) that said we shouldn’t have picked the kids to play.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
DeKoning wasn't getting a game when he was 19. It took until his 3rd season before he got anywhere near the footy.I was big on dropping him before the game. It may have cost us a grand final imo.
He will be a good player but playing a 19 yo in an important key position in a final didn't work.
Gavong said that, DeKonong did well for Geelong although he faced less pressure.
Out of these, Rentsch is the strongest possibility, but Jerome Lawrence might have a higher ceiling, however if Lemmey and Scully are gone and a KPF is what the tigers are after there are other to consider.Mr Smythe
I'm in need of your expertise.
Seen this article and wonder if any of these guys would be better than some of the KPF that might be available around our pick.
Jerome Lawrence (Oakleigh Chargers/Hawthorn F/S)
Age: 19
Position: Key forward (196cm)
Jerome Lawrence, the son of premiership Hawk Stephen, has popped up as one of the “surprise packets” of this year’s draft. The father-son prospect played 10 games in the NAB League, showing good speed off the mark and aerial skills. He kicked five goals in a standout performance this season, and finished with another 10 goals from nine matches. Potential is a word being thrown around by recruiters.
Kaelan Bradtke (Sydney VFL)
Age: 20
Position: Key forward (196cm)
He scored a state combine invite after just two VFL games, such is the raw athleticism he shows. He’s 196cm but has incredible speed and agility. It’s untapped potential to a large extent, but if a club could get the best out of him it would be a bargain pickup. He has bolted into draft calculations after his late-season showings for Sydney.
Josh Rentsch (Sturt)
Age: 18
Position: Forward (197cm, 100kg)
Josh Rentsch is considered one of the strongest contested marks in the AFL Draft crop. The key forward has been likened to Port Adelaide’s Charlie Dixon, due to his sheer size and presence. But despite winning the 2021 Morrish Medal (NAB League best and fairest) and being named in both the 2021 NAB League Team of the Year and the Victoria Country State Under 19s team, Rentsch was overlooked in the 2021 Draft. So he turned to Sturt in the SANFL and dominated at Reserves level, kicking 12.8 in seven games. The teen was promoted to the league side to see out the 2022 season, but didn’t have as big an impact on the scoreboard, finishing with 10 goals from 11 games.
Hamish Ellem (West Adelaide)
Age: 21
Position: Forward (195cm, 96kg)
The Sydney Academy product arrived in the SANFL with plenty of expectation, with recruiters impressed by his speed and hands at ground level considering his size. Hamish Ellem is no stranger to the Draft process, having attended the combine back in 2019 after representing the Allies that same year. Now more mature, Ellem is a key position forward and back-up ruck who once blitzed the 20m sprint - registering 3.01 despite his almost 100kg frame. The 21-year-old kicked 13 goals from his 16 SANFL league matches, including 4.0 against North Adelaide late in the season.
How would these guys stack up against say a Tom Scully, Harry Lemmey, Jovan Petric type (KPFs around our picks) in regards to potential?