WaynesWorld19
Moderator
- Moderator
- #13
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Depends on if Oliver/Neale types go 90 or 180 in the next three, most of the round fluctations are coming from the players that everyone hasIn terms of setting expectations for weeks ahead, what do you guys reckon a decent score for a bye would be?
Back of the napkin calcs: 18 is 80% of 22 fielded players.
So say if you've been getting 2400 for the past three rounds, 80% of that would be 1920.
It could be a little less because we're going to be reliant on players who are normally benched to make up the numbers.
So maybe par could be 75% of our most recent 3 game average?
i vaguely remember someone winning a bye round last year with 2261 (see my avatar) - which compared to other bye rounds was about average for the win. i guess check previous years threads for any further reference.In terms of setting expectations for weeks ahead, what do you guys reckon a decent score for a bye would be?
Back of the napkin calcs: 18 is 80% of 22 fielded players.
So say if you've been getting 2400 for the past three rounds, 80% of that would be 1920.
It could be a little less because we're going to be reliant on players who are normally benched to make up the numbers.
So maybe par could be 75% of our most recent 3 game average?
Right, but if we wanted to use our round 12 projected score to judge how well we've planned for the byes... somewhere around 80% would be ok, yeah?Depends on if Oliver/Neale types go 90 or 180 in the next three, most of the round fluctations are coming from the players that everyone has
Crazy good. And complete with a Heeney ballsup!i vaguely remember someone winning a bye round last year with 2261 (see my avatar) - which compared to other bye rounds was about average for the win. i guess check previous years threads for any further reference.
Bye rounds are going to see big fluctuations. It's always good to average them out over the 3 rounds. If you average 1900 per round over the 3, you are doing pretty well. I'm hoping for better than that this year as a lot of us have reached full premo earlier than normal. My projected is 2025 this week and, like most, round 12 should be my worst round. Currently have 19/18/19 for the 3 rounds (barring injuries/ omissions). However, like most after round 12 i'll use 3 trades to bring in round 12 bye players to trade out players who are about to have theirs, and likewise for the following round. Hoping for 21/21 for round 13 and 14.Right, but if we wanted to use our round 12 projected score to judge how well we've planned for the byes... somewhere around 80% would be ok, yeah?
Very helpful. Cheers!Bye rounds are going to see big fluctuations. It's always good to average them out over the 3 rounds. If you average 1900 per round over the 3, you are doing pretty well. I'm hoping for better than that this year as a lot of us have reached full premo earlier than normal. My projected is 2025 this week and, like most, round 12 should be my worst round. Currently have 19/18/19 for the 3 rounds (barring injuries/ omissions). However, like most after round 12 i'll use 3 trades to bring in round 12 bye players to trade out players who are about to have theirs, and likewise for the following round. Hoping for 21/21 for round 13 and 14.
If you can average close to 2000 across the 3 you’re doing very well.In terms of setting expectations for weeks ahead, what do you guys reckon a decent score for a bye would be?
Back of the napkin calcs: 18 is 80% of 22 fielded players.
So say if you've been getting 2400 for the past three rounds, 80% of that would be 1920.
It could be a little less because we're going to be reliant on players who are normally benched to make up the numbers.
So maybe par could be 75% of our most recent 3 game average?
You'll be right , thats what boosts and this week is for, if that doesn't work apply Jiska's thinking - it's the average over the byes not each week that;s important.Currently have 14 players playing in R13 which includes Preuss and Hayes.
Your best bet would always be the round ranking for the week IMORight, but if we wanted to use our round 12 projected score to judge how well we've planned for the byes... somewhere around 80% would be ok, yeah?
That’s amazing18, 19, 22. Without trades.
(If Cleary plays)
Havent traded for byes whatsoever.
After this weeks trades I have 19, 19, 18.
Not counting my loop r3 or Thompson as they wont be playing.
I'm happy enough.