Strategy 2022 Planning Thread

[Seymour Skinner]

 

[rocker_oz33]

Rory the desk Larid price...600k ..??

 

[buttox]

Rory the desk Larid price...600k ..??

Yep. And Crouch is back. (i think)
pass.

 

[rocker_oz33]

Yep. And Crouch is back. (i think)
pass.

M.Crouch back .

No B.Crouch.
Sloane...pretty cooked .

M.Crouch and Larid main mids .

 

[A Bit Dusty]

Yep. And Crouch is back. (i think)
pass.

Laird is a Star he will dominate again this year

 

[buttox]

Laird is a Star he will dominate again this year

Probably. He is a jet.
But the plan is to pick 5 x 120 average mids to start the year. (hopefully)
I cant see him averaging that much.
I think we are spoilt for choice in the midfield this year.
The bar has been raised.

 

[blueiris]

Laird is a Star he will dominate again this year

The risk isn’t that great he didn’t score heavily last season and can’t be picked in defence this year

 

[rocker_oz33]

Probably. He is a jet.
But the plan is to pick 5 x 120 average mids to start the year. (hopefully)
I cant see him averaging that much.
I think we are spoilt for choice in the midfield this year.
The bar has been raised.

5 ×z 120 mids @ 650 /680 plus each...

 

[rocker_oz33]

The risk isn’t that great he didn’t score heavily last season and can’t be picked in defence this year

Not enough for you..

 

[blueiris]

5 ×z 120 mids @ 650 /680 plus each...

Neale is very capable of 120 for under 600k the others are probably MacRea Oliver Steele and Petracca

 

[blueiris]

Not enough for you..

View attachment 1292089

No not for he’s price at likely $600k and losing defender status

 

[rocker_oz33]

Neale is very capable of 120 for under 600k the others are probably MacRea Oliver Steele and Petracca

Neale prob the cheapest he's been in years ..

 

[buttox]

5 ×z 120 mids @ 650 /680 plus each...

Roughly 4.3mil for
Gawn, Grundy, Macrae, Oliver, Touk, Steele and Neale.
Yep.
The goal would be 7 x 120 averages.
I wont get it but you plan for success.

 

[La Dispute]

Horne, NWM, Johnson, Erasmus, Roberts for me.
I plan on skipping the Vic rookies unless they go nuts in the NAB.
They have not really played any footy for the last 2 years.
I reckon not playing the game you are developing in is guaranteed to stunt development.

Forgot about Erasmus. Absolute lock, and my pick to go on and become the best player of his draft class.

Not too fussed about picking Vic draftees. They make up a surprising amount of ground across the pre-season, hence Cox, Perkins etc came in and performed pretty well straight away. No doubt there's some impact, but not enough to deter me from picking some of these guys - especially if they are killing it over pre-season.

 

[rocker_oz33]

How much for chewy chew- bacca .
625 to 635..?

People jumped on him no DPP.

But Larid get donuts ..

Righto.

 

[WaynesWorld19]

How much for chewy chew- bacca .
625 to 635..?

People jumped on him no DPP.

But Larid get donuts ..

Righto.

 

[rocker_oz33]

Roughly 4.3mil for
Gawn, Grundy, Macrae, Oliver, Touk, Steele and Neale.
Yep.
The goal would be 7 x 120 averages.
I wont get it but you plan for success.

Dressed for success...

 

[rocker_oz33]

View attachment 1292127

Whats your problem

 

[blueiris]

How much for chewy chew- bacca .
625 to 635..?

People jumped on him no DPP.

But Larid get donuts ..

Righto.

Pet is younger and seems more likely to be consistently in people’s top 5 midfielders

 

[WaynesWorld19]

Whats your problem

 

[Caztheconquerer]

How much for chewy chew- bacca .
625 to 635..?

People jumped on him no DPP.

But Larid get donuts ..

Righto.

Laird is lock for me, in all positions last year was ranked 11th overall

 

[Lindsay_Gilbee]

A very very early look at what I’d like to run with premo wise. Obviously rookies will depend on preseason.


Whitfield - Ridley - Crisp

Macrae - Mitchell - Neale - Merrett

Grundy - Darcy

Dunkley - Duncan - Treloar - Butters

 

[Flandersss]

Butters lockity locked

Dunkley also

 

[Flandersss]

Duncan & Treloar = yuck

 

[Flandersss]

Big O very interesting

 

[rocker_oz33]

Big O very interesting

He's a interesting looking Kent indeed.