Lore
Moderator ❀
- Dec 14, 2015
- 44,870
- 66,252
- AFL Club
- Essendon
- Other Teams
- Jye Caldwell & Georgia Clarke
- Thread starter
- Moderator
- #2
See OP for details: Click here
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No clue! You'd think after missing out on Franklin last year they'd still take Wakfer though, it's not like there's many available players that would be better in the long run, or have enough impact to make them a finals contender next seasonDo you know if they can put Wakfer straight on the inactive list (assuming they draft her)? Could they potentially make another pick (or pass) at the draft, or would they have to wait to sign someone after?
Either way, that's a lot of turnover.
Drafting Wakfer and signing a mature age replacement seems like a pretty easy decision for them, if Wakfer is as far ahead of the non-Roberts part of the pool as people have suggested.No clue! You'd think after missing out on Franklin last year they'd still take Wakfer though, it's not like there's many available players that would be better in the long run, or have enough impact to make them a finals contender next season
Apart from Ella Roberts of course, but they'll already have her!
We'll know for sure how many picks each club has on Saturday when the draft order is confirmed, I think the last day for delisting was before list lodgement 2 last Thursday, so now that the rookies are sorted they'll tally it all up and see what is going on. Still have father-daughter nominations to come today as well.
Thanks VS. That is quite a few more than the 80 picks mentioned around the traps but looks about right.Below is what I've got for the draft order right now, if anyone's interested. Adjusted pick number on the left, old number in brackets. Using spoiler tags so people on mobiles don't have to scroll past the wall of text.
Hawthorn could wind up with one less pick if they confirm Smith pre-draft. If the league lifts the vaccine mandate, St Kilda would end up with one less pick for Patrikios. It's not clear what would happen with Adelaide and Varnhagen, but I wouldn't be surprised, given the lateness of it all, if they allowed Adelaide to make one less pick at the draft.
EDIT: Added a Melbourne pick for Colvin injury.
Cheers - I'd missed that one. I thought she was still just out due to anti-vax stuff.Vernhagen is officially inactive, due to pregnancy, so will be in the same boat as all the other nominated inactive players and be able to be replaced through the draft.
Yep, so they've got pick 49 at Melbourne in the full order but the club by club summary has pick 49 missing altogether. There's always an errorThe final order is now out with 87 picks, unless clubs pass and look to recruit post draft
AFLW Latest News - AFL.com.au/aflw
Latest breaking AFLW news from the official website of the Australian Football League.www.womens.afl
Did we figure out who Hawthorn's 23rd player is? I haven't been through to check, but I assume the differences between my order and their one is Hawthorn having one less pick and St Kilda still having Patrikios on the active list.The final order is now out with 87 picks, unless clubs pass and look to recruit post draft
There's a sticky list in the Hawks thread and the Ins and Outs tab in the spreadsheet sticky - that's everyone I know of (and should be everyone full stop).Did we figure out who Hawthorn's 23rd player is? I haven't been through to check, but I assume the differences between my order and their one is Hawthorn having one less pick and St Kilda still having Patrikios on the active list.
I'm still counting only 22, though, which is the same number that was reported on womens.afl. That, plus Patrikios being listed as inactive is how I ended up at 89.There's a sticky list in the Hawks thread and the Ins and Outs tab in the spreadsheet sticky - that's everyone I know of (and should be everyone full stop).
That seems like the right call for what you're doing. I wish they'd just pass along the list lodgements. It'd make tracking things so much easier.But there are always inconsistencies in what is reported and the total number of available spots, happens every year with the AFL as well so not just the AFLW being poorly communicated. That's why I don't update the draft order until they confirm it, it's too bloody hard to remove picks they shouldn't have and then add them back again after it turns out someone got quietly delisted or retired or whatever
That would be helpful for sure.That seems like the right call for what you're doing. I wish they'd just pass along the list lodgements. It'd make tracking things so much easier.
It sounds like the hawks have signed an Irish player who hasn’t yet been officially announced - that was the explanation by Gemma Bastiani when I queried it on Twitter.I'm still counting only 22, though, which is the same number that was reported on womens.afl. That, plus Patrikios being listed as inactive is how I ended up at 89.
That seems like the right call for what you're doing. I wish they'd just pass along the list lodgements. It'd make tracking things so much easier.