gringo2011
Premium Platinum
Since when?
Don't you read what people post on here. I'd say more people want him gone than to keep him.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: St Kilda v Western Bulldogs - 7:30PM Thu
Squiggle tips Saints at 51% chance -- What's your tip? -- Team line-ups »
Since when?
As Ratten said though, his second half of last season‘s kicking was very good. 28.6 or something similar.
But thats the point - you were quoting Joeys review of our demographic. Which is essentially saying our list has no up side as they are too old or our youth isn’t good enough.Geelong are an extremely well managed and professional club.
When last have they actually stuffed up?
They recruit well and develop well and have brought in young players all the while.
Yes, they only may have a year or two left of their champion players, they might fall off the cliff ( debatable because they bring in good young players all the time - hell they got three first rounders for Kelly) but they’ve given their supporters close to two decades worth of joy.
Not only can they handle the truth, they are entitled to it.True. With how King finished last season you'd probably tick off on his goalkicking.
Ratten's words tonight have been honest, finally. Saying that post bye they all haven't got it right. And that they're open for other help for King. It's a shame that we all get p*ssed off during the season and listening to the BS, but once it's over the truth comes out. Same thing with the rubbish fitness levels last season. Supporters can handle the truth during the season too.
No, he was pointing at our middle ground - Ross, Billings, Crouch, Steele, Wilkie, Hill, Membrey etc all 27/28 plus years and saying they are not the ones who are going to get us to a flag necessarily, while pointing out who we’ve got coming up….not terribly much -But thats the point - you were quoting Joeys review of our demographic. Which is essentially saying our list has no up side as they are too old or our youth isn’t good enough.
He’s looking at Ryder, Hanners, Geary (who are potentially all retiring) and on the other end Byrnes, Bytel, Connelly and Allison.
Every club has players coming in that won’t make it and players that are too old. Geelong are no exception. I think it’s a nothing assessment of the list. He’s just trying to be controversial.
Whether Geelong are well run or not is not what I was talking about.
Fair enough but imo it’s a media story, not much in it. Yep we look middle of road with the form we are in but like I said you can bend a story which ever way you want. There’s plenty of upside or plenty of downside depending on your bend.No, he was pointing at our middle ground - Ross, Billings, Crouch, Steele, Wilkie, Hill, Membrey etc all 27/28 plus years and saying they are not the ones who are going to get us to a flag necessarily, while pointing out who we’ve got coming up….not terribly much -
King
Windy, Owens, NAS all babies still with a lot to prove
Bytel, Byrnes - not sure they’re even going to make it.
Maybe I’m not explaining it well. Maybe you can find it, or someone can post it here. Joey may be in the media, but he is not a sensationalist just trying to knock the club. I don’t think he’s wrong either.
Fair enough but imo it’s a media story, not much in it. Yep we look middle of road with the form we are in but like I said you can bend a story which ever way you want. There’s plenty of upside or plenty of downside depending on your bend.
Now we want to delist Jones
Since when?
I think BT is a bit like me in that when you say “we” it is assumed you’re referring to the St Kilda Football Club rather than you and some other postersDon't you read what people post on here. I'd say more people want him gone than to keep him.
Fair enough…at the moment I’m trending “downside”.Fair enough but imo it’s a media story, not much in it. Yep we look middle of road with the form we are in but like I said you can bend a story which ever way you want. There’s plenty of upside or plenty of downside depending on your bend.
I don’t miss nick hind
I don’t miss nick hind
I saw that during the game.
That is seriously unacceptable, no matter what.
Initially I thought he didn’t want to look at him because he was dragged because he’d stuffed up and given away a 50 ( if I recall correctly) but it looks really bad.
It will be interesting to see what happens with Hind. That was absolutely toxic behaviour, wouldn't be surprised if Clarko comes in and just says "get rid of him".It's unbelievable. He wilfully ignores him like he's the unpopular kid at school who's going to drain his social capital. Pretending he can't see or hear a guy who tapping him and speaking to him. He hasn't got any authority over them.
He was probably a great 2IC where the players saw him as a good cop but given the role he hasn't got the gravitas to put his ideas to them and have them perform.
The players are going to get a shock when they get Clarko. Hind would never play again if he tried that.
I don’t miss nick hind
I don’t miss nick hind
Don't you read what people post on here. I'd say more people want him gone than to keep him.
I wouldn't trade Gresham in a pink fit. He's something different in a midfield full of inside plodders (Ross, Crouch, Steele, Bytel). Also, he played very well this season and it's no surprise our best footy was when he was in the guts and playing strongly.I also agree, we need a complete reset. If Hill wants to play under Clarko I would drive him to his new location.
Billings needs a fresh start some where else and contrary I would also look at moving on Gresham if the right deal was offered. Both are injury prone and offer no foreseen improvement going forward.
Go to the draft with a hand full of high draft picks and be prepared to take a step back before going forward.
If you had the option would you trade Jones for Bruce this offseason?I just don't trust these guys that have stuffed up and got us where we are, to get us out of it again. Using the same lot to do the recruiting and trading is asking for more of the same.
Remember how we were going to sell off players and the new ones were always going to be better. People told me I was stupid for suggesting that we shouldn't have traded Bruce for peanuts and that Jones was an upgrade. Now we want to delist Jones and want to chase a forward to help out King.
Watch them sell required players for down grades before they realise that Ratts and the footy department are the issue.
His papers should be stamped. I don’t care what you think of the coach that sort of display is unacceptable outside of the under 10s.It will be interesting to see what happens with Hind. That was absolutely toxic behaviour, wouldn't be surprised if Clarko comes in and just says "get rid of him".
Nah, we need mids with pace and at least Jones has that. He’d also be getting at least 200k less than Bruce. Better to focus on younger guys with upside.If you had the option would you trade Jones for Bruce this offseason?
To me it's really much of a muchness - they both are pretty average and I'm certainly not crying out for bruce back at the club. He has only 2 good seasons - 1 when he first broke out for us playing forward and the other when he got to the dogs and had a bit of a the kick up the bum. Otherwise a very average player.