Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
lol. so you would've kept Watts? Hilarious.So you're admitting you would have been stupid enough to delist watts who ended up being worth the pick that got us Fritsch.. that's embarrassing![]()
Incorrect assumptions are your specialty. I was very happy to trade him especially for the pick. I wouldn't have delisted him thats just moroniclol. so you would've kept Watts? Hilarious.

So you would have delisted him and never drafted Fritsch as a result?lol. so you would've kept Watts? Hilarious.

I would've tried to trade him first. But if no offers, I would've delisted him. We wouldn't have got Fritsch because I would've traded him 6 years earlier. So who knows who we would've got.So you would have delisted him and never drafted Fritsch as a result?![]()
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Didn't Neeld try to trade Watts in 2012 when he was culling the list and got vetoed by the club?Would you have delisted Neville Jetta? Tom McDonald? Spare us the nonsense you Jason Taylor faux impersonator. Nobody was delisting Watts, you'd keep him on low wedge if nobody else wanted him but there was not a point where he wasn't worth a spot on the list, if not in the 22.
Nah it wasntPick 31 for Watts was unders at the time
Pick 31 for Watts was unders at the time
Was a player that perhaps could have had a better career if he wasn't at the basket case of a club a bit like Sylvia as well clearly our most talented player probably would had been a gun If he wasn't in a cellar dwelling side.Watts was playing great footy in 2016 and 2017, I was pissed we traded him at the time because it appeared he had finally found his spot, being used as a front half utility somewhat, in the ruck when needed, on the wing, high half forward, regular forward. Would love to have someone like him on our list now like that who could use the ball as well as Jack going inside 50.
To say he was cuttable is absolute nonsense.If you wanted to make a case for cutting him it would have been in the Neeld years.
Was a player that perhaps could have had a better career if he wasn't at the basket case of a club a bit like Sylvia as well clearly our most talented player probably would had been a gun If he wasn't in a cellar dwelling side.
I agree but he looked pretty good playing in defence which is probably the only good thing neeld did during his tenure. (Besides moving garland forward in that essendon game)I think him being pigeon holed as a KPF for the first half of his career didnt help, never showed he was that at AFL level. Took until Roos to unlock the best of him.
Only for people that were blinded by their loyalty to Watts. I was stoked to get anything for him to be honest. That was the biggest waste of 10 years.Pick 31 for Watts was unders at the time
That was the biggest waste of 10 years.
Tell me a young Jack Watts isn't what he reminds you of...
So yeah, exactly like Watts.Looked pretty good imo. A few soft moments and some fumbles, but showed some promise in the forward line and up the ground.

Offer him the world.Logan McDonald missing out on the GF, we should be in his ear.