List Mgmt. 2022 Trade, Draft, etc thread

[Scythe]

Dory_77 – might be worth pinning this? Gets updated after every move.

 

[A11dAtP0w3R]

33, 43 and 53 for Grundy looks like a good deal from our end, especially if he is taking a paycut of some description.

Yea, im perfectly fine with that if we dont have to trade something else with 27 again to move up. Very good deal.

 

[LarryDavidNeitz]

33, 43 and 53 for Grundy looks like a good deal from our end, especially if he is taking a paycut of some description.

In itself it’s a pretty good deal. Certainly backs up the suggestion we’re not planning to take many selections at the draft though.

Assuming the 27 is for Grundy, what does that leave us with?

 

[LarryDavidNeitz]

Lamb says we wouldn’t have even used the 43. Which makes it a no brainer, we’ve effectively swapped 33 for 27.

 

[A11dAtP0w3R]

Lamb says we wouldn’t have even used the 43. Which makes it a no brainer, we’ve effectively swapped 33 for 27.

Is the draft really that shallow? Jesus Christ

 

[Daemon]

Guessing that pick 27 will be for Grundy. Not bad if that's the case.

 

[LarryDavidNeitz]

Is the draft really that shallow? Jesus Christ

I guess if it’s true it’s indicating that we want to take the picks for Jackson to the draft and only use 3.
Whatever pick we get for Bedford will be our last selection.

 

[A11dAtP0w3R]

I guess if it’s true it’s indicating that we want to take the picks for Jackson to the draft and only use 3.
Whatever pick we get for Bedford will be our last selection.

Smells like MFC Proper Gander to me. Im struggling to wrap my head around not being able to get a better player than Melksham at 43.

 

[A11dAtP0w3R]

Also, so long 6 KPF dream. What a terrible day.

 

[stEdy]

Also, so long 6 KPF dream. What a terrible day.

There's always a chance we split our first rounders we get from Jackson into 6 separate picks so we can splurge on those juicy 18 year old KPFs

 

[Fork n Hell]

Is the draft really that shallow? Jesus Christ

yeah i've heard this year could be the smallest amount of kids ever taken in the draft. might also explain why so many meh players are changing clubs this year.

 

[danster168]

Also, so long 6 KPF dream. What a terrible day.

6 kpf over 2 years. Nonetheless, we can kiss 2023 goodbye. No forward line. Thanks Goody

 

[The Dr]

6 kpf over 2 years. Nonetheless, we can kiss 2023 goodbye. No forward line. Thanks Goody

Yes, trade period is definitely over after one day.


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com

 

[Dory_77]

There's always a chance we split our first rounders we get from Jackson into 6 separate picks so we can splurge on those juicy 18 year old KPFs

What's the limit on pre-season supplement signings? Could nab another 2 or 3 there, plus a mid season draftee or two. We'll be overflowing with KPFs by September 2023

 

[LarryDavidNeitz]

Smells like MFC Proper Gander to me. Im struggling to wrap my head around not being able to get a better player than Melksham at 43.

Absolutely agree with that. Doesn’t make any sense to me to keep Melk and not use pick 43

 

[schmuttt]

I wouldn’t be surprised if Harmes to Essendon is still in play. Assuming the 27 is for grundy means we need to pick up a couple more early picks to take the required 3 players.

 

[LarryDavidNeitz]

I wouldn’t be surprised if Harmes to Essendon is still in play. Assuming the 27 is for grundy means we need to pick up a couple more early picks to take the required 3 players.

AFL website actually reporting we’re only intending to take 2 picks. I thought minimum was 3 but they’d know.

Not good news for A11dAtP0w3R, why would we trade Bedford for a pick in the 40s if we’re not gonna use it

 

[schmuttt]

AFL website actually reporting we’re only intending to take 2 picks. I thought minimum was 3 but they’d know.

Not good news for A11dAtP0w3R, why would we trade Bedford for a pick in the 40s if we’re not gonna use it

I can see us trading our our first next year and Freos first for another top 10 pick this year. Have done this three times already under current footy department.

 

[I Love Lamb]

Absolutely agree with that. Doesn’t make any sense to me to keep Melk and not use pick 43

Melk I am ok with but Oscar Baker. Surely there is better available in the draft. Hell, just throw all the names in a hat and pick one out at random and my moneys on that player being better than Baker.

 

[Theseventhhamster]

If you have danster on ignore youre only hurting yourself. Youre missing some entertaining stuff.

Well I'm ****ed now anyway if I want to read this thread.

 

[Crimson Azure]

You’ve delisted A11dAtP0w3R ?!!!

Never made it onto my list. The Altona U9’s was a strong team this year.

What a cicada CA is

I identify as a turnip thank you.

 

[MarcMaverick]

Never mad onto my list. The Altona U9’s was a strong team this year.

I identify as a turnip thank you.

Why a turnip? Why not a Beetroot? Or Rhubarb and Blueberry.

 

[Crimson Azure]

Why a turnip? Why not a Beetroot? Or Rhubarb and Blueberry.

Apparently it’s bad manners to ask something or someone why they identify that way.

just love me MM.

 

[MarcMaverick]

Apparently it’s bad manners to ask something or someone why they identify that way.

just love me MM.

I would but I am beholden to the church of Beetrootology. And I also have a vested interest in the Blueberry stocks.

You're cool in other ways.

 

[A11dAtP0w3R]

AFL website actually reporting we’re only intending to take 2 picks. I thought minimum was 3 but they’d know.

Not good news for A11dAtP0w3R, why would we trade Bedford for a pick in the 40s if we’re not gonna use it

Must mean we are actually keeping the majority of our spuds, Melk, Baker, Weid etc

 

[mrmonkey]

Never mad onto my list. The Altona U9’s was a strong team this year.

I identify as a turnip thank you.