They're different types yes, but Bytel isn't without his own qualities.Windhager and Owens are far more dynamic prospects than Bytel.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
They're different types yes, but Bytel isn't without his own qualities.Windhager and Owens are far more dynamic prospects than Bytel.
Different players though.
Would really like to see Bytel get another year ( hopefully injury free) to show us what he’s got before we move him on.
Would be a great midfield with all of them in it.They're different types yes, but Bytel isn't without his own qualities.
IIRC: at an early Sandringham game at TBBO this year, Bytel, Owen and Windhager all started in the centre square. A real life demonstration of what each offers and also a demonstration that the sum of the parts is greater than the sum of the whole.They're different types yes, but Bytel isn't without his own qualities.
With Ratts signed on for a couple of years, I'd like to see us get in someone like Choco as director of coaching or something similar. Let 'em play the good cop/bad cop game. Choco I think would provide a bit of a harder edge to the environment, seems to be an extremely competitive individual.
I wanted him as coach when they appointed Richo.
With Ratts signed on for a couple of years, I'd like to see us get in someone like Choco as director of coaching or something similar. Let 'em play the good cop/bad cop game. Choco I think would provide a bit of a harder edge to the environment, seems to be an extremely competitive individual.
I wanted him as coach when they appointed Richo.
WhatRath in talks with Clarko
Pretty sure it would be in their (Pies) cap for the amounts and period agreed to.Someone has probably addressed this before but how does collingwood paying out $300,000 for someone to play at another club work. Who’s cap is that in ?. Is it in anyones cap ? The bulldogs effectively have a mid they can‘t fit under there cap playing for them, surely that‘s a rort. How would you like to loose a gf to a team that had a couple of deals like that. Bloody Melbourne with Gawn and Grundy on collingwoods cash isn’t something I’m looking forward to.
I have a weird feeling it might just be North.Where is Clarko going at the moment? Someone said that Yze is leading the GWS race. Does that mean he's bound for North? Someone said to me that they think Port might make a play for him. If he's chasing staff you'd think that he's already agreed to a role.
I don't like selling off future picks. What if we screw up the pick Brisbane have and next year bottom out. We give them pick 3 or 4 for a pick 16 in a weaker draft. Part of the reason we don't have lots of quality is selling off our picks for years.
Clarko want's him with his next coaching gig, would mean Rath gives up his job at the Saints, i think he would step into Leaths current job.Bam!!
Can't just drop that and walk off!!
Someone has probably addressed this before but how does collingwood paying out $300,000 for someone to play at another club work. Who’s cap is that in ?. Is it in anyones cap ? The bulldogs effectively have a mid they can‘t fit under there cap playing for them, surely that‘s a rort. How would you like to loose a gf to a team that had a couple of deals like that. Bloody Melbourne with Gawn and Grundy on collingwoods cash isn’t something I’m looking forward to.
Interesting. If Rath is the problem here why does Clarko want him. Would be funny if he went to another club and improved them.Clarko want's him with his next coaching gig, would mean Rath gives up his job at the Saints, i think he would step into Leaths current job.
Ok , which is itMaybe we can do a deal with Norf.
Norf get all their best players and trade them to us , they get paid ludicrous money and Norf pay a heap under their cap.
Then after we win the premiership, we trade players to Norf and pay their salary under our cap.
just take it in turns winning threepeats then tanking for a few.
BUT WE HAVE TO GO FIRST ...ITS OUR TURN.
Whoever gets highmore for peanuts is gonna look like a genius when he kills it at AFL level.
It's gonna be us getting membrey for free in reverse.
For better or worse we are committed to wilkie, battle and howard longterm- plus coffield to return somewhere/somehow.
I personally think all those guys are quality backmen individually, but any combination of them in the 22 together leaves us with a weak backline if we are trying to be a top 4 team in the next few years.
We've painted ourselves into a corner by drafting all the same kind of player.
Plus howard who is tall... but no good at wearing an opponent like a glove- so he in effect plays the same as wilkie, highmore, battle, coffield despite his height.
Really poor list management- this is why you don't solely draft for "best available" with absolutely zero regard for what you already have (or expect to have).
Not a rort, the salary is under the cap for both clubs, makes clubs be accountable for their long term contracts.Someone has probably addressed this before but how does collingwood paying out $300,000 for someone to play at another club work. Who’s cap is that in ?. Is it in anyones cap ? The bulldogs effectively have a mid they can‘t fit under there cap playing for them, surely that‘s a rort. How would you like to loose a gf to a team that had a couple of deals like that. Bloody Melbourne with Gawn and Grundy on collingwoods cash isn’t something I’m looking forward to.
Wouldn't be that funny - lolInteresting. If Rath is the problem here why does Clarko want him. Would be funny if he went to another club and improved them.
Interesting. If Rath is the problem here why does Clarko want him. Would be funny if he went to another club and improved them.
Not a rort, the salary is under the cap for both clubs, makes clubs be accountable for their long term contracts.
If Grundy goes, that is 2 x 300k effectively a 600k player they have lost.
You keep saying it but its just not accurate.
One 1st round pick that brought in Hill, Howard & Ryder.
One 1st round that brought us another 1st & 2nd
One downgraded 1st that brought us a 21 year old.
There’s reasons why we are lacking talent but it is not because we are ‘topping up for years’ as you keep stating.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk