Remove this Banner Ad

List Mgmt. 2022 Trade Thread - Part II

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Review is actually the only interesting and important thing in this post season so far. A better run club attracts better players and success, Geelong and the Swans are a great example of this. All the Clark and Norf stuff is minor step stones and side tracks.
It starts with a defined culture, strong development and consistant leadership. The BS recruitment of players from other clubs to the detriment of our own guys we've drafted is a case in point. In addition, there is no st kilda brand or identity.
 
The Clarko effect. It's causing delusion and an inflated sense of being that is only existing in a tenuous virtual state. Their cockiness is only erect due to this football version of Mexican Viagra. It may have serious and perhaps debilitating side effects. At the moment we have noticed a highly irrational brain fever that is causing an inflated sense of identity and conflated sense of purpose. As yet, nothing has been shown or seen to be standing up. We will look on and monitor the situation closely, but right now it can be assumed that their cockiness will soon be rendered impotent.
That three-peat of Clarko's was a long time ago in the footy world.
A lot has changed.

Anyhoo... here's Tom with the weather.
Just read about clarko and his little gangs alleged activities whilst in charge at hawthorn. If what’s been reported is in fact true then Clarkson and Fagan both have some serious problems, 5 years for clarko could turn out to be an absolute disaster.
 
And yet quite a few on here (no names, cough cough) wanted us to jump on Clarkson.

It’s often said that something is “typically St Kilda”.

However there could be no more “typically St Kilda” than to sack Ratts and pay him out, hire Clarkson for 5 years at ridiculous dollars only to be looking around for a new coach several weeks later.

Sad for Roos, but thank f@#k it wasn’t us [emoji50]‍[emoji100]

Who says we have escaped this with Ratten serving alongside Clarko for six years. Time will tell if he had any involvement.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Feel sorry for the Roos. It’s been one thing after the other for them in the last 5 years and just when they were seeming to right their ship, they have the wind taken out of their sails again.
Not sure where this leaves them.
Nothing to do with north the afl should be scrambling hard to help them.
 
Who says we have escaped this with Ratten serving alongside Clarko for six years. Time will tell if he had any involvement.
Hope the Long wanting out & the rumours that Hill wants a trade are not related.
 
Holy shitballs, this is appalling if substantiated.
If anybody at our club did this they would be gone in a second in my view.

Wonder what Brad Hill thinks,? No wonder Cyril Rioli won't go back.

Tell another human to kill his kid, the Kent thinks he is King Solomon.
No sympathy for North. Hope they fold.
 
Who says we have escaped this with Ratten serving alongside Clarko for six years. Time will tell if he had any involvement.

Difference being if Ratten was involved and had to stand down, about 50% of those on this forum would be happy.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

The journo has been careful enough with the allegations and l don't think Ratts will be in the gun unless more comes out.
Clarko and Fages will be stood down and the AFL will move to limit fallout. Cut and burn.
Just when Gil thought it was safe to lean back on his chaor, have a brandy and cigar and reminisce about his time as chief....this thing rears its head

On SM-F711B using BigFooty.com mobile app
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

And yet quite a few on here (no names, cough cough) wanted us to jump on Clarkson.

It’s often said that something is “typically St Kilda”.

However there could be no more “typically St Kilda” than to sack Ratts and pay him out, hire Clarkson for 5 years at ridiculous dollars only to be looking around for a new coach several weeks later.

Sad for Roos, but thank f@#k it wasn’t us [emoji50]‍[emoji100]
But we didn't know about all of this so it's still gross negligence and incompetence on our part amirite.

We should be in the thick of this, more incompetence from our leaders.
 
Maybe this is the rocket he needs if he not putting in the same effort as his club peers are to get the most out of himself.
I think it could be a win win. We won’t trade him unless we get something good in return and if he does stay could be a wake up call for him. Maybe we are
Doing this for a reason. Just wish I knew what it was
 
Difference being if Ratten was involved and had to stand down, about 50% of those on this forum would be happy.

If ratten is found to be involved then 100% would be fine with it
Just clarify my post, yes 100% would be fine with Ratten being removed if he was found to be involved.

My 50% is in regards to those simply being happy that Ratten was no longer coaching our side based on their views on his coaching ability.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top