Analysis 2023 Draft Watch

[bmaurizio]

Thoughts on a Taylor Goad for our 2nd.

High upside prospect. Ruck height but Key back potential

On Pixel 7 using BigFooty.com mobile app

Yup agree one would think, either one of Taylor Goad or Charlie Edwards, would come under consideration for either if our two picks.
Both lads easily 2 M + , Versatile, Athletic and would seem to be bright AFL prospects.

 

[The Return of the Paf]

Yup agree one would think, either one of Taylor Goad or Charlie Edwards, would come under consideration for either if our two picks.
Both lads easily 2 M + , Versatile, Athletic and would seem to be bright AFL prospects.

Wrong Edwards.

 

[Coona Blues]

Thoughts on a Taylor Goad for our 2nd.

High upside prospect. Ruck height but Key back potential

On Pixel 7 using BigFooty.com mobile app

Not against the idea. He is a great prospect. Projects ruck, but athletic enough to be an option elsewhere.

 

[bmaurizio]

Yup my bad , its Mitch Edwards 206/88kg Ruck/ Forward has potential, alson we need a young tall option KPD to develop.

 

[katmanblue]

111 by the start of next season, still a nipper!

We don't use that word any longer.

On SM-F926B using BigFooty.com mobile app

 

[KnaveyBlue]

Well, don't use it then. It was obvious what context I meant it in. Next time people will be telling me that 'cloud' is now an offensive word.

I think he was just making a joke. You're not cancelled.

...for now.

 

[swuzzlebubble]

nipper

We don't use that word any longer.

Aged challenged person

 

[ferrisb]

111 by the start of next season, still a nipper!

We talking about Thy's grandkids?

 

[AT97]

ABC’s top 30

AFL draft top 30 — ranking the best prospects set to take the league by storm

The 2023 AFL draft is just around the corner, and a new crop of young guns are ready to make their mark at your club. Here are our rankings of the 30 best talents set to be drafted this year.

www.abc.net.au

 

[katmanblue]

I don't know who this 'we' is but it was obvious by the context that I didn't mean it in any derogatory sense. Next people will be telling me that 'cloud' is now an offensive word.

Obviously taking you out if context for faux outrage was the joke.

On SM-F926B using BigFooty.com mobile app

 

[myblueroan]

I don't know who this 'we' is but it was obvious by the context that I didn't mean it in any derogatory sense. Next people will be telling me that 'cloud' is now an offensive word.

Pretty sure just a light hearted attempt at pun humourfrom katman Paf. That's his schtick.
No malice and nothing toward you. Sometimes internet communiques are difficult. Hard to get nuance. That's why I overuse emojis.

 

[C4[2]Yo`DooR]

Need a little luck to fall our way, but my ideal/dream result would be the bolded:

22 - Harley Reid / Collard/ Edwards

28 - Tholstrup/ Mannagh/ Curtain / Moir

"Thats right Mr. Dillon, big smile ... everybodies nice and happy"

 

[ferrisb]

Need a little luck to fall our way, but my ideal/dream result would be the bolded:

22 - Harley Reid / Collard/ Edwards

Harley Reid's team-mates didn't attend his birthday party.

Pretty sure

 

[myblueroan]

I didn't see the pun because it never entered into my head that that word (with the added 'per') might also be construed as derogatory. It seemed a little tenuous. It had me racing furiously to google the only word it could possibly be. It took me a little while to find that definition, but there it was. I panicked...

I tbouggt Kat was going somewhere else with it...

 

[myblueroan]

...probably but that works more as a visual pun and I tend to read posts in forums as if they are being spoken.

Yep. Best forgotten now eh?

 

[Sheephead]

Lachie Neale

9

Lachie Neale

Age

32

Ht

177cm

Wt

84kg

Pos.

Mid

Career

Season

Last 5

D

27.0

5star

K

11.5

4star

HB

15.5

5star

M

4.0

4star

T

3.7

5star

CL

5.9

5star

D

28.3

5star

K

13.9

5star

HB

14.4

5star

M

4.6

4star

T

4.0

5star

CL

5.9

5star

D

12.0

3star

K

4.6

2star

HB

7.4

5star

M

2.0

3star

T

1.0

3star

CL

0.4

3star

was Pick 58, so was Dane Swan

Dane Swan

Age

41

Ht

185cm

Wt

93kg

Pos.

Mid

Career

Season

Last 5

D

26.9

5star

K

16.4

5star

HB

10.4

5star

M

5.9

5star

T

3.1

5star

CL

5.4

5star

No current season stats available

D

12.0

3star

K

7.0

3star

HB

5.0

4star

M

3.0

3star

T

1.0

3star

. Goodes was a late pick. The games record holder was Pick 55. Jeremy McGovern

20

Jeremy Mcgovern

Age

33

Ht

197cm

Wt

97kg

Pos.

Def

Career

Season

Last 5

D

14.7

4star

K

10.1

4star

HB

4.6

3star

M

6.8

5star

T

1.5

3star

MG

238.7

4star

D

12.4

3star

K

8.6

3star

HB

3.8

3star

M

6.4

5star

T

2.0

3star

MG

183.4

3star

D

11.0

3star

K

8.8

4star

HB

2.2

2star

M

7.2

5star

T

1.4

4star

and Tiprat Milne were rookie selections. The draft is an absolute lottery.

I’d be using our picks on a mid and a KPP if we want a diamond in the rough. Simpson and Dawson would do me. Uninspired but very solid.

 

[bradfisher14]

Our list is already very solid. It's time to take some high upside gambles to get us over the top.

 

[The Return of the Paf]

Our list is already very solid. It's time to take some high upside gambles to get us over the top.

Agreed, but there will probably be disagreement as to who they should be.

 

[BigFrizz36]

Our list is already very solid. It's time to take some high upside gambles to get us over the top.

Would Fantasia qualify under that criteria?

 

[ferrisb]

It's time to take some high upside gambles to get us over the top.

Would Fantasia qualify under that criteria?

Is the upside high?
Or is that just Fantasi(a)?

 

[bradfisher14]

Agreed, but there will probably be disagreement as to who they'd be.

Here are some examples that I think are within our draft range: Collard, Moir, Tholstrup, Jiath, Wil Dawson, Archer Reid.

Would Fantasia qualify under that criteria?

Yes and Elijah Hollands. But I want more.

 

[GoBlues!]

Is the upside high?
Or is that just Fantasi(a)?

Because I'm easy come, easy go, can play a little high, little low.

Doesn’t really matter to me..

 

[4flagsin5yrs]

Yup agree one would think, either one of Taylor Goad or Charlie Edwards, would come under consideration for either if our two picks.
Both lads easily 2 M + , Versatile, Athletic and would seem to be bright AFL prospects.

Mitch?

I'm very keen - see yellow!

 

[4flagsin5yrs]

And Logan too.

Can play back too...

 

[JuddgementDay]

Here are some examples that I think are within our draft range: Collard, Moir, Tholstrup, Jiath, Wil Dawson, Archer Reid.



Yes and Elijah Hollands. But I want more.

Of those, lock in Tholstrup and Collard easily - but, I don't think either will be around at our picks