List Mgmt. 2023 Trade & List Management Thread II - Goldy&Bucket➡️✅/'24 EoFR & #44➡️Stephens&#25✅/#21&#25➡️Fisher&#17✅/'24 EoFR➡️#18✅

[Lore]

Hello Shinboners!

The embedded resources below are kept up to date by the trade board mods (as much as possible – we are human after all). Enjoy!

Spoiler: 2023 Draft Order

Spoiler: 2024 Draft Order, aka Future Picks

Spoiler: Blue Tick Rumours

 

[New_Roo]

If you can't see a team that has finished bottom two the last 4 years needing to turn over more than 3 list spots in the draft, then maybe?

Are you calling you a nuffie?

We won't have spots for my than 3 in the draft, max 4... there are other ways to refresh a list other than via draft


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com

 

[4cunningTonneTruck]

 

[Shinboner roo]

Just watched that sam mcClure podcast clip, he's really is going balls to the wall saying he doesn't want to go to Perth

 

[justroyal]

if we can land 2,3,7 or 8. **** yeah I’ll sign that petition

 

[TurnoverMerchant]

Such desperation [emoji15]

 

[The Dingrel]

can one of you pls hop on our board and post an outrageously bad trade offer for pick 1?

i think it would be funny

Surely it has to involve "WA's finest product" Liam Anthony wanting to go home!

 

[Harris 10]

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

one of the all time great movies blackshadow

 

[Harris 10]

Real football nuffie behaviour

 

[Ligma]

 

[year of the roo]

I don't care if we then let him rot in the VFL, but walking Esava to the PSD ****ing up Poorta's plans at the same time would be the best bit of business we've done since we used to pillage Freo in the 90s.

 

[Shermanator]

 

[Crazy Horse]

Secret herbs and spices? Why can't people in the industry get their minds around the fact the AFL didn't rate Franklin pick 19 and McKay pick 3. They rated them both worthy of band 1 compensation and then the process is that you get the first available pick after your clubs first pick. The reason for that is that clubs lower down the ladder can least afford to lose their best players. It is about attempting to equalise the comp. Not rating the players pick 3 or 19.

Exactly. It's ok for Joe Public to have a misconception over the free agency compo provisions but for an accredited journalist, AFL club administrator (looking at you Dawks) or coach to get it wrong is a complete disgrace.

It's easy enough to get your head around the rules, and if your job is to communicate those rules then you have a duty to get it right. To do otherwise is unprofessional and worthy of having your reputation thrown in the bin.

 

[big_e]

 

[Skarrz]

****ing lol these Eagles supporters

 

[LB2Snake]

Desperate times call for .....

 

[Passmore]

That's pathetic.

Sent from my SM-A908B using Tapatalk

 

[kool kangas]

If WC trade their first pick to anyone else except us then they clearly don't know what they are doing..

 

[New_Roo]

Talk on Logan McDonald seeking a trade next year.

Hate to see it.

Talk he was seeking this year.... hence Freo were looking for a couple of firsts


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com

 

[speedy]

We won't have spots for my than 3 in the draft, max 4... there are other ways to refresh a list other than via draft


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com

Then swap out 17 18 for future 1st's if we cant combine them to get another top 10 pick. Just don't throw them away to move up one spot.

 

[DesertRoo]

if we can land 2,3,7 or 8. * yeah I’ll sign that petition

I suspect if we get that draft haul, Brady’s phone would go silent.

 

[speedy]

Talk he was seeking this year.... hence Freo were looking for a couple of firsts


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com

If Swans were offered 2 first this year for McDonald, I reckon they would have taken it and not looked back.

 

[Tas]

The only reason we should be chasing Picks 7 or 8 is to use 3 top 10 picks on draft night and not to package two of them up to move up one position in the order.

I don't think it would be worth the cost of upgrading to 7/8, if you look at the trade in isolation, if we didn't have the good picks we had, would we do that trade? It kind of cheapens the price we paid to get Port's future first imo if we hock it off so cheaply for an upgrade.

To have access to three likely elite juniors and restrict every other Club to one in the top 10 will have a huge impact not only our rebuild but the speed of it.

I think the only reason we would go for it is because West Coast want two top 10s for 1. Isn't there a big drop off from the first 6 to the next tier?

Imagine those three on top of Sheezel/Wardlaw/George. All in the space of 2 years. Seriously.

As much as I like Reid, I like our current hand. I wouldn't do anymore trades unless the next trade is a multi-club trade that includes 1 going to us. Port cashed in their future 1st for Rata and now Geelong said it isn't enough.

I don't why people would sacrifice a 3 to 1 ratio of top 10 picks by giving WC a second pick and reducing us to two picks also - if we picked up 7 or 8.

Reid's unlikely to be that good to piss that advantage away.

So if the club thinks this is the next 2009 draft and Reid is Dustin Martin then you would rather have Morabito, Rohan, Sheppard and Butcher? :stern look

We don't have a crystal ball, we kind of have to trust those at the club have a better understanding of how good the quality of this draft is.

 

[big_e]

Talk he was seeking this year.... hence Freo were looking for a couple of firsts


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com

McDonald and Amiss would be a pretty handy forward line for the next ten years.

 

[PokerRoo]

PSD


Perfect Mackay cover for 12 months, then send him to Port for 24 lmao

Imagine there is a Mid season trade....grab him in the PSD. sitting him in the VFL, then trade after round 10 to port

 

[BlueandWhiteinmyBlood]

There were some really awful rumours getting around this morning, I hope they had no merit in them.

Clearly something extra curricular has gone on last night. If you want a check up you go via the club gp, if you want scans you go to Olympic park.