List Mgmt. 2023 Trade & List Management Thread III

[Frank Thring]

I'd rather keep 15, 17 and 18 because on draft night we will get some enticing offers like future firsts. Hold 'em Brady.

 

[tiltraise]

I wouldn't be against going McKercher and O'Sullivan with picks 2 and 3.

I don't think there is all that much difference between those in the top 8.

If we want O'Sullivan we should trade back from 3 to 6.

 

[Mop]

I don't think it is disputed that 2 or (less likely) 3 would be part of the deal. Rawling said as much yesterday.

It has been by some. Happy to see the horses mouth has killed that myth. Cheers

 

[Mop]

You’re sounding more and more like that turnip Gossage

He is a Turnip, yes. Not sure how I compare though - he said Dev Rob was coming about 45 minutes before the news broke he wasn’t

 

[Mop]

They’re not that happy to keep it though, hence why it’s such a discussion.

You’re basing this off of.. what?

 

[Mop]

The logic is that West Coast would probably value getting more than one very good draftee out of this spoon year. They don’t have the player leaving that North did last year to grab Sheezel and Wardlaw, but they do hold the top pick in a draft where that has extra value. May well go with the single player but there are reasons so many people think they might not.

And I agree - it MAY be beneficial to trade down to improve the lacklustre mid draft holdings - but it would have to be of value.
The offer of four mid picks doesn’t address anything here . Again, I refer back to the perfectly reasonable Hawthorn offer.

It’s just a matter of what Rawlings is happy to pony up and whether it nets us what we need.

I reckon the deal happens myself. Neither of us will be perfectly happy.

 

[Samsquanch]

 

[spurs]

You’re basing this off of.. what?

You being here every 30 minutes

 

[Psicosis]

You’re basing this off of.. what?

Oh seriously we don’t need to go into this again do we?

If you wanna post on this board, open your f*kn eyes. If you’d rather continue in denial, your board is full of likeminded people in denial.

 

[Better Loosen Up]

If we want O'Sullivan we should trade back from 3 to 6.

3 for 6 and a F1

 

[Harris 10]

3 for 6 and a F1

And supply them with a heap of white powder just to make the death ride more entertaining.

 

[Passmore]

Rawlings has mentioned multiple times we’re happy with 2 & 3 if we can’t get 1. I doubt trading down to 6 is on the cards.

 

[kirbonavich]

Rawlings on SEN this morning super keen to move on 15, 17 and 18 (& 57).

Anyone have a list of clubs list vacancies?

 

[My Left Foote]

FFS just change the thread title to “MOP 2023 MOP Trade MOP & MOP List MOP Management MOP Thread MOP III MOP” already.

 

[LB2Snake]

3 for 6 and a F1

Dees would bite our hand off for that deal, which is the very reason we shouldn’t be doing it.
You don’t trade backwards when you hold 2 and 3 in a draft. Possibly from 3 to 4 on the night, if we know who the recipient of 3 is taking.

We can shape the whole thing from a month out. Don’t move.

 

[tiltraise]

3 for 6 and a F1

We can get more pick 3 huge in this pool.

In: 6, 11, F1
Out: 3, 18

 

[Shinboner1]

I'd rather keep 15, 17 and 18 because on draft night we will get some enticing offers like future firsts. Hold 'em Brady.

I'd rather keep them and get good players in

 

[Shinboner1]

Rawlings on SEN this morning super keen to move on 15, 17 and 18 (& 57).

Anyone have a list of clubs list vacancies?

Urgh

 

[JGreezy]

What’s with this rhetoric as if North giving us something we need?

We have pick 1. The club has said repeatedly it’s quite happy to keep it.

Your (relative) junk picks aren’t any good here.

Strange logic.

What's with eagles fans feeling the need to police every comment on this website?

 

[Sillygit]

FFS just change the thread title to “MOP 2023 MOP Trade MOP & MOP List MOP Management MOP Thread MOP III MOP” already.

 

[Roo096]

Just a quick question what is the better value O'Sullivan at 10 or Curtain at 6?

 

[giantroo]

Rawlings on SEN this morning super keen to move on 15, 17 and 18 (& 57).

Anyone have a list of clubs list vacancies?

5 primary, 2 rookies.

 

[JGreezy]

Just a quick question what is the better value O'Sullivan at 10 or Curtain at 6?

Curtin at 6. I like O'Sullivan but KPDs always take time to develop and its hard to pick the good ones at 18 years old.

Curtin brings a bit more and might be a good pick without becoming a KPD.

O'Sullivan also wants to to be a forward.

 

[Hearts to hearts]

And I agree - it MAY be beneficial to trade down to improve the lacklustre mid draft holdings - but it would have to be of value.
The offer of four mid picks doesn’t address anything here . Again, I refer back to the perfectly reasonable Hawthorn offer.

It’s just a matter of what Rawlings is happy to pony up and whether it nets us what we need.

I reckon the deal happens myself. Neither of us will be perfectly happy.

I’ll be happy. Not especially invested in any outcome in particular.

 

[Roo096]

To be honest I haven't seen much of O'Sullivan play but what I have seen of Curtain I can see a very good player in 2 to 3 years time.If we pass on Curtain I hope it doesn't come back to bite us.