George
Premium Platinum
- Aug 17, 2015
- 45,307
- 127,303
- AFL Club
- St Kilda
- Other Teams
- Phi Eagles & Phillies, Liverpool, PAO FC
- Banned
- #1,126
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Underrated post.I agree Dad
Id reply to stkildadeaths post and pic with "Close, but my hairs longer"
But I can't as their post is within my quote
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Anyone hear the rumour about Flanders being part of the package that brings Dusty to GC?
Where did you hear that? And why the f would the want dusty. He is on 1.5milAnyone hear the rumour about Flanders being part of the package that brings Dusty to GC?
Sounds like just a rumour. Why would he pick Richmond given they've just loaded up on mids last off season?Anyone hear the rumour about Flanders being part of the package that brings Dusty to GC?
Surely Dusty doeant go up there to get 300 unless he isn't wanted
No current season stats available
No doubt against usWon’t happen Dusty will play his 300 at Richmond next year it is a significant milestone
Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
I hate those looserListening to Brady Rawlings on Gettable
Sounds like
- Lock to get access to Saunders
- Lock to get extra picks in an assistance package
- Lock to lowball us for Clark and maybe Billings
Can’t happen surely.Reckon we'll see the AFL give Norf a package on the proviso that Weagles are happy with what they get to trade pick 1 to Norf.
Weagles are the biggest team in the comp, the AFL don't want them down for too long. They also want Norf off the drip and they don't want another JHF scenario.
Norf don't really lose a pick with the trade either because they get a free his at Sanders.
Would love someone to run the sums and see how many games Norf have won in the last decade compared to us. No free hit for McKenzie for us or any package coming our way despite losing a #1 pick for nothing.
Unbelievable.
For Dusty:Where did you hear that? And why the f would the want dusty. He is on 1.5mil
More about Richmond picking him as part of a deal, I think.Sounds like just a rumour. Why would he pick Richmond given they've just loaded up on mids last off season?
Dampener? There’s positive stuff in here?!BTW: hate to put a dampener on the thread but it is what it is.
BTW: hate to put a dampener on the thread but it is what it is.
Who mentioned either Clark or billings ?Listening to Brady Rawlings on Gettable
Sounds like
- Lock to get access to Saunders
- Lock to get extra picks in an assistance package
- Lock to lowball us for Clark and maybe Billings
No current season stats available
Yeah it’s absolutely ****ed. We had to get absolute scraps in compromised drafts when we were at the bottom and then to add salt to the wound we lost our number 1 pick effectively due to concussion after 4 years on the list.Reckon we'll see the AFL give Norf a package on the proviso that Weagles are happy with what they get to trade pick 1 to Norf.
Weagles are the biggest team in the comp, the AFL don't want them down for too long. They also want Norf off the drip and they don't want another JHF scenario.
Norf don't really lose a pick with the trade either because they get a free his at Sanders.
Would love someone to run the sums and see how many games Norf have won in the last decade compared to us. No free hit for McKenzie for us or any package coming our way despite losing a #1 pick for nothing.
Unbelievable.