George
Premium Platinum
- Aug 17, 2015
- 45,307
- 127,303
- AFL Club
- St Kilda
- Other Teams
- Phi Eagles & Phillies, Liverpool, PAO FC
- Banned
- #1,126
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
I guess the argument would be that confident Gresh would be first picked out of Higgins and Butler. If he’s not, then he’s not worth a whole stack.Gresham can't hit a target in general play and is best suited to being a small forward where he would be behind Higgins and Butler.
Think Gresham leaves because he wants more money than we're offering and more midfield opportunities than we're offering
No Harmes is 31, Haynes is 27.
Higgins a great mark for his size and Butler's chasedown pressure and crumbing is elite. Gresham might have more natural talent but he's lazy and entitledI guess the argument would be that confident Gresh would be first picked out of Higgins and Butler. If he’s not, then he’s not worth a whole stack.
And Jarryd Hayne is 35Wayne Harmes is 63
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Like who though?Given we're looking to be aggressive this trade period, it wouldn't surprise me if we look to pry an established player out of Richmond. They're in serious need of draft capital for their rebuild. Surely you'd ask the question of a few of their players.
Taranto
I'd love to get Bolton, potentially even Gibcus to lock up our bookends for the next decade
That's like suggesting a player going from Man U to Blackburn Rovers to get to Liverpool because they can't go there directly. Within a year.Taranto

Would like Liam Baker. Also Dusty, could spark him.to go for another flag, otherwise he is just playing out time.I'd love to get Bolton, potentially even Gibcus to lock up our bookends for the next decade
Gold coast and GWS are chock full of high end talents wasting away in VFL. provided that we do our diligence and scouting, this would be a smart way to improve our list quickly without a full rebuild. Flanders and Hollands are both mid/forwards that are dynamic and skillful, if we can do these type of deals, draft well, plus bring in 1 other senior body like Matt Crouch, then our midfield would be instantly transformed (allowing for injury to 1 or 2 of Steele, Crouch and Ross during the course of a season)If Hollands from GC is gettable along with Flanders, could we make a play for both in a package deal for our first rounder?
I know we want to hit the draft but Hollands seriously impressed me last season with his ability to kick goals while winning the ball as a high half forward.
17 touches and a goal a game last season (in a small sample size) is nothing to sneeze at.
Getting as much young talent through the door should be the goal and I feel more confident that one of Hollands or Flanders will make a huge difference to the team rather than a middling first rounder in a draft with a lack of mids anyway.
Christ...here we goSaints signed some Irish players apparently

I always wanted shai boltonTake the money we were going to offer De Goey and throw it at Shai Bolton.
I agree with most of this, Webster though is pretty brave and goes for it.If we could build a strong midfield, with the whole team capable of winning contested ball, then Players like Hill, Henry can flourish.. Currently, half of the team can’t win contested ball, this needs to be addressed. Especially the backline. Stocker, Wilkie, Sinclair win their own ball. Webster, Howard are stoppers only, often punches the ball away then falls over, so need to be be improved.
Holland's hasn't shown a lot IMO. You'd want to get him at bargain price.Yeah definitely worth a look. I reckon he's the other of the trio that has been forgotten a bit. Dew had a few on the outer at any one time. Hollands, Sharp and Flanders were the three always getting sniffed around. Hollands was the first one everyone was keen on and then Flanders came good and everyone forgot Hollands.
According to his manager a while ago he’s playing his ideal role of forward-mid so not sure he’d be going for more opportunity. My concern if he goes is Ross rarely plays anyone under 27 years old in the midfield and without Gresh’s minutes in there as a point of difference it’s more of the boring players.Gresham can't hit a target in general play and is best suited to being a small forward where he would be behind Higgins and Butler.
Think Gresham leaves because he wants more money than we're offering and more midfield opportunities than we're offering
Particularly on liquor licensing, blokes an expert on that apparentlyPretty accurate Morris.
Breaks a lot of news. Especially this year

Zlugger, underrated nicknameWilks took Jack to the cleaners yesterday... Zlugger was usually matched up against one of their kids.
Expect Wilks will get the job on the umpires pet again this week.

And playing in good winning teams constantly that can mean everyone gets a lick of the ice cream. Outside of those couple of games there are numbers that we would be ripping into our guys for. Anyway - ultimately our recruiters will be watching and have a better idea. Sharp looked really good early days. Just one that hasn’t gone on at all - maybe opportunities, maybe he’s just not to the level.
Given we're looking to be aggressive this trade period, it wouldn't surprise me if we look to pry an established player out of Richmond. They're in serious need of draft capital for their rebuild. Surely you'd ask the question of a few of their players.
Where would you see his best possie? Wing or mdfield I gather?
This is just an absurd situation the afl is an absolute joke. We get to pick over the players GC don’t want and pay overs to provide them with even more draft capital to use as they choose. While they keep the cream of the crop and usher in an ever increasing haul of academy players we get to decide how we‘ll use our solitary first round pick.Holland's hasn't shown a lot IMO. You'd want to get him at bargain price.
This is just an absurd situation the afl is an absolute joke. We get to pick over the players GC don’t want and pay overs to provide them with even more draft capital to use as they choose. While they keep the cream of the crop and usher in an ever increasing haul of academy players we get to decide how we‘ll use our solitary first round pick.
Anyone who thinks we’re heading for a flag challenge with GC cast offs is delusional Imo. We need a new strategy and playing nice isn’t going to work, if we need to shake up the afl so be it. Imo our board needs a dose of reality, despite making the right noises all they have really done is rolled over and consigned us to a permanent role just making up the numbers.
If this offseason goes the way I think it will we’ll struggle to match what we’ve achieved this year and then what ? Another lower mid first round pick. I’m sure that will really move the needle compared to GC etc and their conga line of academy freebies, maybe we can give them two firsts for Ben king if they decide he’s surplus to requirements.
Unless we pull a rabbit out of the hat and find some backbone individually or collectively with other clubs I think maybe one more season will see me turning off the afl altogether and just watching local footy.