List Mgmt. 2023 Trade Thread - Part II

[XhazzafootyX]

We have offered coffield a new deal- Riley Beveridge

 

[Winmar2Lockett]

We have offered coffield a new deal- Riley Beveridge

2 years hopefully


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[botts]

We have offered coffield a new deal- Riley Beveridge

God I hope he takes it

 

[botts]

2 years hopefully


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Maybe also be so we can have an argument that we have when he requests a trade

 

[StCicatriz]

We have offered coffield a new deal- Riley Beveridge

also pleasing

 

[Tommy Wigs]

Their favour to us is paying gresham to get him from band 2 to band 1. Our favour to them is taking Shiel off their books. If they want more than that we are better off taking the band 2 and running imo.If Gresham doesn't even arract band 2 there is no point in letting him go to begin with.

We don’t know yet how much of a favour the Shiel part is. It’s only speculation and we do know that they had a war chest, whether they may now be closer to spending it.

Just can’t see Essendon being able to do that deal with nothing going back. It’s the equivalent to the nuffy Essendon fans claiming the reverse.

 

[StCicatriz]

i'd love to send Clark to north for some of those future 2nd rounders

 

[St Neil]

We need to get one of these north late first next year. Perfect to package up with ours to get to the pointy end

North will want to trade them this year in case they risk losing them next year.

North have been difficult to trade with. They will ask for plenty.

 

[St Neil]

Hawks supporters say it’s an attitude issue more than anything else.

Ross and Enright’d fix that up quick smart.

Really like that idea.

Is he free or do we need to trade?

 

[Darrian Barnett]

North not getting band 1 for McKay would be some sweet sweet justice after getting that bs assistance package. That plus Essendon would have to use their first to get him.

It wouldn't go down like that but it would be the dream.

 

[BrutThough]

We have offered coffield a new deal- Riley Beveridge

Hopefully good enough to convince him to stay.

 

[Teflon]

I must be taking crazy pills but I reckon Shiel would walk into our midfield and improve it. I'd only take him if it's a freebie, at his age he's worth nothing but he's not dogshit. He can be a good option for us IF he's fit and IF he's free.

More limp…

 

[gringo2011]

I really think we should try to use our Gresh compo pick and Howard to get North's McKay compo pick.

They grab McKercher at 2, we grab Sanders at 3 or the reverse, they get Howard to replace McKay and still have a first round pick, everyone is happy.

Getting rid of Howard is a bit risky for us though, we're not exactly flush with mobile tall backmen. I'd be happy if he stayed, but if he gets us the gun mid we're crying out for, so be it and we'll have to cross our fingers Cordy can hold the fort and Van Es comes on well.

Sanders is nowhere near a pick 3. McKercher probably behind Curtin too and not a certain pick 3 or 4. North could go for Caddy or Watson even, someone with a bit more scoring power as they have an incredibly stacked inside brigade now. LDU, Simpkin, Wardlaw, Phillips and Thomas and then depth with guys like Greenwood and pile of others. At least 4 look like they should be potential stars and the other is their captain.

 

[gringo2011]

Yeah, it is hard to tell where we are. Feels like we are two good players away from being a top 4 contender or 2 bad injuries away from being bottom 8.

I don't like trading future 1st either but in this draft anyway, 12 seems to be in no man's land.

I reckon this is a very even draft around 6 to 20 or something. I'd like Windsor and Demattia or one of those types. I reckon they might end up being a pretty good players. Unless you are getting right up into the top 5 I can't see and reason to trade up. Even then McKercher or Reid are the only ones I'd actually want to move up for.

 

[Ricmel]

I reckon this is a very even draft around 6 to 20 or something. I'd like Windsor and Demattia or one of those types. I reckon they might end up being a pretty good players. Unless you are getting right up into the top 5 I can't see and reason to trade up. Even then McKercher or Reid are the only ones I'd actually want to move up for.

Yeah, I would only consider trading future first for top 5. Any chance we could get McKercher and it would be worth exploring I reckon. I get that 6 - 20 range will have good options but I am thinking in terms of trying to get a high potential A grader.

 

[gringo2011]

Not really.

It’s a thinly veiled threat to the club.

Get better…. Quickly, or lose them.

I.e trade them

Well no, it's sell them now or tank next season to keep them. It's a risky move by the AFL, if they can't get a deal they'll be tanking hard.

 

[gringo2011]

Yeah, I would only consider trading future first for top 5. Any chance we could get McKercher and it would be worth exploring I reckon. I get that 6 - 20 range will have good options but I am thinking in terms of trying to get a high potential A grader.

Fair enough.

 

[Dr Spaceman]

Really like that idea.

Is he free or do we need to trade?

He's been delisted so presumably could sign him up for free like we did with Stocker.

 

[Cleanupsoup]

Can't see North trading pick 3 for Howard and pick 13. But if they did you would take it and run.

Which is crazy based on Clarko pissing and moaning about 'you dont just find ready made key defenders at pick 3'


If thats the case, we will take pick 3 thanks

 

[Diehard Saint]

North will want to trade them this year in case they risk losing them next year.

North have been difficult to trade with. They will ask for plenty.

Especially since RTB had a bit to say about it

 

[Atomboy]

We have Hammer, he will be better than Lobb.

I reckon the Hammer could go alright in the backline.

Definitely got the speed and aggression for it.

 

[bird_man]

If compensation is band 2 then we match Essendon’s offer. The compensation pick will end up being in the mid 20s. Gresham is worth more than that.

Doubt we match band 2

 

[beside the seaside]

What if the deal is, Essendon pay overs for Gresh so we get 13. We then trade 13 for Shiel and their second which is 28 and they pay for Shiel. So we get an upgrade on the Gresh compo and get Shiel.

Out: Gresh
In: Shiel, 28

 

[BrutThough]

What if the deal is, Essendon pay overs for Gresh so we get 13. We then trade 13 for Shiel and their second which is 28 and they pay for Shiel. So we get an upgrade on the Gresh compo and get Shiel.

Out: Gresh
In: Shiel, 28

Would still rather pick 13.

 

[beside the seaside]

Would still rather pick 13.

Obviously but we don't get it unless he generates band 1 which he won't.

We could dog them and re-neg though