Thanks mate. CheersWe had 2 players on the long term Injury list. This allowed us to take Buller and Arnold in the midseason draft.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Supercoach Round 12 SC Gameday Talk - SC Trades ,//, AFL Fantasy Round 12 AF Gameday Talk - AF Trades
Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Thanks mate. CheersWe had 2 players on the long term Injury list. This allowed us to take Buller and Arnold in the midseason draft.
Great update, always such a handy resource. Just a note, you've got Campbell as no. 10 instead of 16.
Some updates on Sam, Mills and Stretch:
![]()
Luckless tall to return to training, Mills gets a boost
Sam Reid will start pre-season training on Monday after being re-listed by the Swans on Wednesdaywww.afl.com.au
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
I initially missed that you had said "in depth" and was thinking "whaaaat?" but in fact you are exactly correct. Unless we get hit dreadfully by injury we will be OK by shuffling the magnets and using the three you mention plus Fox. But I believe next year's draft will be a focus on mids. Who knows about trades. I suspect we won't be big players there after this year's effort.Looking at Rusty's list there has confirmed an inkling I had but hadn't really studied. Especially with Mills out, there is very little experience in depth in "non-tall" positions. Jordon with 60 odd games, Sheldrick and Roberts with a few games each. Which is fine in that a few younger players will probably get a chance if they earn it, but something to consider.
I think this is an opportunity. Getting games into players like Sheldrick, Roberts, Corey, Konstanty etc will definitely improve the list. If any of those get succussive games then someone with more experience will be depth. That is life.Looking at Rusty's list there has confirmed an inkling I had but hadn't really studied. Especially with Mills out, there is very little experience in depth in "non-tall" positions. Jordon with 60 odd games, Sheldrick and Roberts with a few games each. Which is fine in that a few younger players will probably get a chance if they earn it, but something to consider.
Fair.Fox's attempt at Round 1 team predictions - Bombers’ overhaul; Crows’ big gamble as nine draft bolters unleashed: Predicted Rd 1 teams
B: Dane Rampe, Tom McCartinPLAYERCARDSTART24Dane Rampe
- Age
- 34
- Ht
- 187cm
- Wt
- 89kg
- Pos.
- Def
CareerSeasonLast 5
- D
- 17.0
- 4star
- K
- 10.6
- 4star
- HB
- 6.4
- 4star
- M
- 4.9
- 5star
- T
- 2.5
- 4star
- MG
- 358.8
- 5star
- D
- 14.1
- 3star
- K
- 9.0
- 4star
- HB
- 5.1
- 3star
- M
- 3.4
- 3star
- T
- 1.5
- 2star
- MG
- 284.5
- 4star
- D
- 10.6
- 3star
- K
- 7.2
- 3star
- HB
- 3.4
- 3star
- M
- 2.4
- 3star
- T
- 1.4
- 4star
PLAYERCARDEND, Harry CunninghamPLAYERCARDSTART30Tom Mccartin
- Age
- 25
- Ht
- 194cm
- Wt
- 99kg
- Pos.
- D/F
CareerSeasonLast 5
- D
- 9.3
- 2star
- K
- 5.6
- 2star
- HB
- 3.7
- 3star
- M
- 3.7
- 4star
- T
- 1.6
- 4star
- MG
- 129.5
- 2star
- D
- 7.2
- 2star
- K
- 4.4
- 2star
- HB
- 2.8
- 2star
- M
- 3.2
- 3star
- T
- 0.8
- 1star
- MG
- 87.4
- 2star
- D
- 9.0
- 3star
- K
- 5.0
- 2star
- HB
- 4.0
- 3star
- M
- 2.8
- 3star
- T
- 2.0
- 4star
- MG
- 168.0
- 3star
PLAYERCARDEND
HB: Jake Lloyd, Joel Hamling, Nick BlakeyPLAYERCARDSTART44Jake Lloyd
- Age
- 31
- Ht
- 182cm
- Wt
- 81kg
- Pos.
- D/M
CareerSeasonLast 5
- D
- 23.4
- 5star
- K
- 14.4
- 5star
- HB
- 9.0
- 5star
- M
- 4.3
- 4star
- T
- 1.9
- 4star
- MG
- 403.9
- 5star
- D
- 23.4
- 5star
- K
- 14.4
- 5star
- HB
- 9.0
- 4star
- M
- 4.3
- 4star
- T
- 1.9
- 3star
- MG
- 403.9
- 5star
- D
- 23.2
- 5star
- K
- 13.4
- 5star
- HB
- 9.8
- 5star
- M
- 4.2
- 4star
- T
- 2.2
- 4star
- MG
- 357.4
- 5star
PLAYERCARDENDPLAYERCARDSTART22Nick Blakey
- Age
- 25
- Ht
- 196cm
- Wt
- 83kg
- Pos.
- Def
CareerSeasonLast 5
- D
- 9.9
- 3star
- K
- 7.0
- 3star
- HB
- 2.9
- 3star
- M
- 2.3
- 2star
- T
- 2.4
- 4star
- MG
- 189.1
- 3star
- D
- 8.1
- 2star
- K
- 6.3
- 3star
- HB
- 1.9
- 1star
- M
- 2.1
- 2star
- T
- 2.6
- 4star
- MG
- 189.1
- 3star
- D
- 7.2
- 2star
- K
- 5.2
- 2star
- HB
- 2.0
- 2star
- M
- 1.2
- 2star
- T
- 1.2
- 3star
PLAYERCARDEND
C: Errol Gulden, Chad Warner, Justin McInerneyPLAYERCARDSTART1Chad Warner
- Age
- 24
- Ht
- 185cm
- Wt
- 82kg
- Pos.
- M/F
CareerSeasonLast 5
- D
- 7.0
- 2star
- K
- 4.5
- 2star
- HB
- 2.5
- 2star
- M
- 1.5
- 2star
- T
- 1.5
- 3star
- CL
- 0.0
- 1star
- D
- 7.0
- 1star
- K
- 4.5
- 2star
- HB
- 2.5
- 2star
- M
- 1.5
- 2star
- T
- 1.5
- 2star
- CL
- 0.0
- 1star
- D
- 7.0
- 2star
- K
- 4.5
- 2star
- HB
- 2.5
- 3star
- M
- 1.5
- 2star
- T
- 1.5
- 4star
- CL
- 0.0
- 1star
PLAYERCARDENDPLAYERCARDSTART27Justin Mcinerney
- Age
- 24
- Ht
- 189cm
- Wt
- 83kg
- Pos.
- M/F
CareerSeasonLast 5
- D
- 10.2
- 3star
- K
- 4.4
- 2star
- HB
- 5.8
- 4star
- M
- 1.8
- 2star
- T
- 2.0
- 4star
- CL
- 0.6
- 3star
- D
- 12.5
- 3star
- K
- 5.3
- 2star
- HB
- 7.3
- 4star
- M
- 2.3
- 2star
- T
- 2.0
- 3star
- CL
- 0.5
- 3star
- D
- 10.2
- 3star
- K
- 4.4
- 2star
- HB
- 5.8
- 4star
- M
- 1.8
- 2star
- T
- 2.0
- 4star
- CL
- 0.6
- 3star
PLAYERCARDEND
HF: Braeden Campbell, Hayden McLean, Isaac HeeneyPLAYERCARDSTART2Hayden Mclean
- Age
- 26
- Ht
- 197cm
- Wt
- 99kg
- Pos.
- Fwd
CareerSeasonLast 5
- D
- 9.1
- 2star
- K
- 5.1
- 2star
- HB
- 4.0
- 3star
- M
- 2.6
- 3star
- T
- 4.0
- 5star
- G
- 0.4
- 3star
- D
- 7.5
- 2star
- K
- 4.5
- 2star
- HB
- 3.0
- 2star
- M
- 2.3
- 2star
- T
- 3.3
- 4star
- G
- 0.8
- 4star
- D
- 10.0
- 3star
- K
- 5.4
- 2star
- HB
- 4.6
- 4star
- M
- 3.0
- 3star
- T
- 4.4
- 5star
- G
- 0.2
- 3star
PLAYERCARDENDPLAYERCARDSTART5Isaac Heeney
- Age
- 29
- Ht
- 185cm
- Wt
- 88kg
- Pos.
- Mid
CareerSeasonLast 5
- D
- 18.2
- 5star
- K
- 10.4
- 4star
- HB
- 7.7
- 5star
- M
- 4.9
- 5star
- T
- 4.1
- 5star
- CL
- 2.2
- 4star
- D
- 14.3
- 3star
- K
- 8.8
- 4star
- HB
- 5.5
- 3star
- M
- 4.8
- 4star
- T
- 2.5
- 3star
- CL
- 0.8
- 3star
- D
- 10.4
- 3star
- K
- 7.2
- 3star
- HB
- 3.2
- 3star
- M
- 2.8
- 3star
- T
- 2.4
- 4star
- CL
- 0.8
- 3star
PLAYERCARDEND
F: Tom Papley, Joel Amartey, Logan McDonaldPLAYERCARDSTART11Tom Papley
- Age
- 28
- Ht
- 177cm
- Wt
- 77kg
- Pos.
- Fwd
CareerSeasonLast 5
- D
- 14.1
- 4star
- K
- 9.1
- 4star
- HB
- 5.0
- 4star
- M
- 3.7
- 4star
- T
- 3.2
- 5star
- G
- 1.5
- 5star
- D
- 12.3
- 3star
- K
- 8.9
- 4star
- HB
- 3.4
- 2star
- M
- 4.5
- 4star
- T
- 1.5
- 2star
- G
- 2.4
- 5star
- D
- 13.4
- 4star
- K
- 8.0
- 3star
- HB
- 5.4
- 4star
- M
- 3.4
- 4star
- T
- 3.4
- 5star
- G
- 1.6
- 5star
PLAYERCARDEND
FOLL: Brodie Grundy, Luke ParkerPLAYERCARDSTART4Brodie Grundy
- Age
- 31
- Ht
- 202cm
- Wt
- 105kg
- Pos.
- Ruck
CareerSeasonLast 5
- D
- 17.5
- 4star
- K
- 8.0
- 3star
- HB
- 9.6
- 5star
- CL
- 4.1
- 5star
- HO
- 32.0
- 5star
- D
- 16.4
- 4star
- K
- 6.8
- 3star
- HB
- 9.6
- 5star
- CL
- 4.0
- 5star
- HO
- 34.6
- 5star
- D
- 13.8
- 4star
- K
- 5.2
- 2star
- HB
- 8.6
- 5star
- CL
- 2.6
- 5star
- HO
- 20.6
- 5star
PLAYERCARDEND, James RowbottomPLAYERCARDSTART26Luke Parker
- Age
- 32
- Ht
- 183cm
- Wt
- 88kg
- Pos.
- M/F
CareerSeasonLast 5
- D
- 24.2
- 5star
- K
- 12.6
- 5star
- HB
- 11.6
- 5star
- M
- 3.8
- 4star
- T
- 5.6
- 5star
- CL
- 5.8
- 5star
- D
- 22.1
- 5star
- K
- 12.3
- 5star
- HB
- 9.9
- 5star
- M
- 3.9
- 4star
- T
- 5.0
- 5star
- CL
- 5.5
- 5star
- D
- 21.2
- 5star
- K
- 11.4
- 4star
- HB
- 9.8
- 5star
- M
- 2.0
- 3star
- T
- 8.0
- 5star
- CL
- 5.2
- 5star
PLAYERCARDENDPLAYERCARDSTART8James Rowbottom
- Age
- 24
- Ht
- 186cm
- Wt
- 82kg
- Pos.
- Mid
CareerSeasonLast 5
- D
- 14.0
- 4star
- K
- 8.1
- 3star
- HB
- 5.9
- 4star
- M
- 2.2
- 2star
- T
- 4.3
- 5star
- CL
- 2.0
- 4star
- D
- 14.6
- 4star
- K
- 9.0
- 4star
- HB
- 5.6
- 3star
- M
- 1.5
- 2star
- T
- 3.4
- 4star
- CL
- 2.5
- 4star
- D
- 14.4
- 4star
- K
- 7.8
- 3star
- HB
- 6.6
- 4star
- M
- 3.0
- 3star
- T
- 3.6
- 5star
- CL
- 1.2
- 4star
PLAYERCARDEND
I/C: Taylor Adams, Ollie Florent, Will Hayward, James Jordon, Angus Sheldrick (sub)PLAYERCARDSTART9Will Hayward
- Age
- 26
- Ht
- 186cm
- Wt
- 83kg
- Pos.
- Fwd
CareerSeasonLast 5
- D
- 10.6
- 3star
- K
- 6.6
- 3star
- HB
- 4.0
- 3star
- M
- 3.4
- 3star
- T
- 2.8
- 4star
- G
- 1.1
- 4star
- D
- 9.0
- 2star
- K
- 4.3
- 2star
- HB
- 4.7
- 3star
- M
- 2.7
- 3star
- T
- 2.7
- 4star
- G
- 0.7
- 4star
- D
- 9.4
- 3star
- K
- 6.2
- 3star
- HB
- 3.2
- 3star
- M
- 2.6
- 3star
- T
- 3.4
- 5star
- G
- 1.4
- 5star
PLAYERCARDEND
Missing: Callum Mills
Preseason will be very competitive in every area.Fair.
I don't think we got Jordon, best 23 in a Top 4 team, to play VFL. Having said that, I still think Fox should be in there unless we see Florent as progressing in a more defensive role. Depends on the opponent too. If they've got multiple small/medium types (like the Dees will in Round 0), we probably should play Fox. Similarly, we seem to really want a pressure/defensive forward at all costs, so unless we see someone else performing that, Wicks is likely.
However the maths doesn't add up, and given our reluctance to drop Hayward, don't really know who makes way for either of Fox or Wicks.
And I think Melican gets the nod over Hamling if fit, it'll be his spot to lose given his good form when fit late on this season.
I think Jordon is probably on the bench or as sub because of versatility. Need a winger, he's solid. Need an inside mid, he's solid. He loses out to others in direct competition, but is more versatile than say JMac or Campbell as far as the midfield/wing goes. Obviously they can play HB/HF so are versatile elsewhere.Preseason will be very competitive in every area.
Hamling vs Melican vs Francis (pick 1).
Cunningham vs a taller setup (Fox?).
Jordon vs Gulden vs McInerney vs Warner vs Campbell (pick 4?).
Buller vs Amartey.
Wicks vs a taller setup.
Sheldrick and Roberts pushing hard.
Intraclub will be something!
Sheldrick might push Wicks out of the side. The addition of Adams and Jordon despite the loss of Stephens and Mills will create pressure and competition for spots in the midfield. Stephens wasn't a lock. I think Sheldrick can be. Roberts will be pushing too. Something has to give. Wicks is good at his job but he is not as talented as Sheldrick. Nor as powerful.I think Jordon is probably on the bench or as sub because of versatility. Need a winger, he's solid. Need an inside mid, he's solid. He loses out to others in direct competition, but is more versatile than say JMac or Campbell as far as the midfield/wing goes. Obviously they can play HB/HF so are versatile elsewhere.
I think Cunningham is a lock, as there are very few clubs without a small fwd to lock down on. It then becomes a question of who takes the best medium forward we may need to lock down on. Fox is the best option, but for some opponents we might think Florent will do for flexibility. Also depends which Fox is playing. If he's in form, you have him in no question. If questionable, and this was partly due to being thrown around this year, you may not (as much as it pains me).
I think we've shown we want Wicks (or Clarke who is N/A) in the side regardless of any other forward makeup. It'll just depend whether we think a Sheldrick, Campbell etc can mostly fill the role and get some time elsewhere (e.g. Sheldrick midfield, late in quarters).
I think it will probably take another injury (beyond Mills) to break the impasse on the inside.Sheldrick might push Wicks out of the side. The addition of Adams and Jordon despite the loss of Stephens and Mills will create pressure and competition for spots in the midfield. Stephens wasn't a lock. I think Sheldrick can be. Roberts will be pushing too. Something has to give. Wicks is good at his job but he is not as talented as Sheldrick. Nor as powerful.
I reckon Sheldrick is ahead of both Wicks and Konstanty.Konstanty has done nothing yet. Wicks is vanilla small small forward. Sheldrick has more weapons.I think it will probably take another injury (beyond Mills) to break the impasse on the inside.
Adams almost certainly will take Mills' place initially, Parker will continue a high rate of stoppage attendances. Warner and Rowbottom will have the edge on the up-and-comers.
Unless Gulden and Warner are moved more to the outside it's hard to see where Sheldrick or Roberts fit in the normal course of things.
When Mills comes back it will get even more congested.
I'm not at all sure that Sheldrick or Roberts have the agility or acceleration to perform that role more than occasionally or as a stop gap. I suspect Konstanty would get the gig first as long as he progresses.
I think it will probably take another injury (beyond Mills) to break the impasse on the inside.
Adams almost certainly will take Mills' place initially, Parker will continue a high rate of stoppage attendances. Warner and Rowbottom will have the edge on the up-and-comers.
Unless Gulden and Warner are moved more to the outside it's hard to see where Sheldrick or Roberts fit in the normal course of things.
When Mills comes back it will get even more congested.
I'm not at all sure that Sheldrick or Roberts have the agility or acceleration to perform that role more than occasionally or as a stop gap. I suspect Konstanty would get the gig first as long as he progresses.
Leaving aside the Hayward to defence question the rest of your proposition has a lot of merit. Interesting to see what, if any, changes to the game plan (and troops) we see. We have people like Corey available. HHK was the type you propose.I think the league is pressing significantly towards having a big group of hard-running, quick, powerful HF flankers and forward pockets - it's an area that I think we're a little lacking in. Guys who can get up and back the ground but also be really creative and damaging with the extra space afforded by 6-6-6 and man-on-the-mark rules encouraging more daring ball movemenet.
We tend to rest midfielders in our forward line like Rowbottom, Parker, Warner, even Sheldrick when he was fit but I think we saw when McInerney shifted to HF at the end of the year he had a significant impact upon the functioning of the forward line. I think we need to get Papley back to the forward line full-time, we need Konstanty to take a BIG step up this off-season, and I'd be settling McInerney forward from now on - not on the wing. I've said it already but I'd be seriously considering Hayward into defence because I feel his pace isn't quite there to take advantage of what I've listed above given Heeney is also up there. And I think he'd be really good in defence as an intercepting presence.
I don't think we have anyone who can bring forward pressure like Wicks and I feel like it's something we need more of, not less of. Collingwood won a flag with four natural small forwards and we want to essentially go in with only one (Papley) just because the other (Wicks) isn't a glamorous option. Doesn't sound promising to me...
Yep. Unless we have resting mids and/or others like Campbell who can and will do what Wicks does, rather than them having different weapons so to speak, then Wicks is in the 22.I don't think we have anyone who can bring forward pressure like Wicks and I feel like it's something we need more of, not less of. Collingwood won a flag with four natural small forwards and we want to essentially go in with only one (Papley) just because the other (Wicks) isn't a glamorous option. Doesn't sound promising to me...
Brisbane lost by a point and had two. Dee's have two. GWS have three. Blues have two. Two is enough if they are good enough and there's a decent resting mid or two.I don't think we have anyone who can bring forward pressure like Wicks and I feel like it's something we need more of, not less of. Collingwood won a flag with four natural small forwards and we want to essentially go in with only one (Papley) just because the other (Wicks) isn't a glamorous option. Doesn't sound promising to me...
Brisbane had three - Rayner, Cameron & McCarthy. Four if you include Ah Chee. Carlton had three - Fogarty, Cottrell, Motlop. Even Brisbane were lucky to only lose by under a goal to the Pies considering they had about 10 less scoring shots, a disparity that was aided by the fact Collingwood had 14 more inside 50s, a disparity that was aided by Collingwood's superior forward pressure.Brisbane lost by a point and had two. Dee's have two. GWS have three. Blues have two. Two is enough if they are good enough and there's a decent resting mid or two.