Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Think the only way we make any option work (Lynch or otherwise) where we have to actually pay draft capital, is by trading out a regular who might fetch a bit the other way. Still possible, given the exit meetings aren't till next week, otherwise I think we'll be looking to that DFA market, and even if it gets to that I still believe we need at least one for cover. We were already light on up there before Joe made his decision.I can't really see what the deal could end up as?
Us: pick 18, future second?
Them: late picks this year for bid-matching, Lynch, paying some salary - say 400k at most?
We have to give Lynch a 2 year deal to smooth out the salary too, with a bit of extra money to make him actually want to do it, so 750k/yr?
Leaves us light on for extra picks next year, committing a lot of money over two years to a 32 year old who has barely played recently.
I don't think Richmond cares about offloading salary cap, who are they paying next year with Rioli, Bolton, Baker all gone?
I also don't think that the future second is enough to get them to move Lynch on, its not enough of a reward to remove basically any forward who can kick goals next year and protect the development of whatever tall they draft.
Basically it only makes sense if they think his body is totally cooked... at which point I'd be staying away!
If there was a betting market this is what I'd think too. It's how we worked Oscar in originally too, and in-house is a safer bet than us actually convincing someone to come over out of the blue.Unless we can get someone capable of kicking 40+ goals a year (Lynch/2MP) I think it will be Henry Smith next year.
If there was a betting market this is what I'd think too. It's how we worked Oscar in originally too, and in-house is a safer bet than us actually convincing someone to come over out of the blue.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Think the only way we make any option work (Lynch or otherwise) where we have to actually pay draft capital, is by trading out a regular who might fetch a bit the other way. Still possible, given the exit meetings aren't till next week, otherwise I think we'll be looking to that DFA market, and even if it gets to that I still believe we need at least one for cover. We were already light on up there before Joe made his decision.
It is overvaluing Mckay immensely.That's Cooney's worst proposal ever by far, and that includes the Burger Ring.
That’s Essendon McKay type overvaluing.It is overvaluing Mckay immensely.
Tweet deleted cause they were getting trolled so hard in the replies, so here's Cooney's Mega Trade if anyone missed it:
View attachment 2131058
Do feel other clubs would see him as gettable.Cooney is a goose, but FWIW Zac is the one that if other clubs came sniffing and if he was interested in entertaining anything, then I'd also consider what those offers were.
Cooney is a goose, but FWIW Zac is the one that if other clubs came sniffing and if he was interested in entertaining anything, then I'd also consider what those offers were.
Whinging works:
Hard to see how perryman won't be Band 1 as well - likely we are out to Pick 20.
Whinging works:
Hard to see how perryman won't be Band 1 as well - likely we are out to Pick 20.
That one is easy - zero shots are given, same as I would feel if we lost someone and got top compo instead of getting shafted for Rocky.How do the Saints feel that every other club is penalised for Battle leaving and having their picks pushed back?
I wouldn't even give up a pick in the 20's for Battle.
Farcical.
How do the Saints feel that every other club is penalised for Battle leaving and having their picks pushed back?
Cooney is a goose, but FWIW Zac is the one that if other clubs came sniffing and if he was interested in entertaining anything, then I'd also consider what those offers were.
With our squad i wouldn't want him at all
I don't get it at all. Was horrible both times we played them this year
Zac is loved here so it's dangerous mentioning him, but I am in the same camp. I'd prefer to lose him over a Starcevich for example.