Hate to hear it, but I know you’re right.He’s very good, right age, right position of need, and he’s a local who’s dad played for Freo and Peel. And he wants to come here.
We will pay overs if we have to.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Hate to hear it, but I know you’re right.He’s very good, right age, right position of need, and he’s a local who’s dad played for Freo and Peel. And he wants to come here.
We will pay overs if we have to.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
That’s not going to happen. The reason he has chosen us is because we’ve already promised him we’ll do what we can to make a deal.It’s not our fault Bolton wants to leave. Why should we have to cough up our good draft hand? Pass on the bloke. He isn’t worth two of our first rounders, let alone three!
Sturt is 100% weighing his options up, can you blame him, likely waiting on the money factor.Sturt must be leaving - why has he not signed ? Injury prone but I’d prefer he stayed
Swit I’m not sure, kind of always annoyed me but was good at times this year
Banfield should have been delisted sorry he’s not afl standard
Easily worth 4-500 for what he brings to our list. We need to add 2 goals a game, not lose them.Switta contracted to 2026? Yeah I’ll be hanging onto him unless we get overs. Richmond wants every pick under the sun for Bolton allegedly..would want a Shultz like trade for Switta. Not sure of Swittas destination? But he was Box Hill so..
As for Sturt. He is a great kick for goal but besides that adds little for mine. I would rather hang onto him but we can’t get bent over $ wise.
If we lose Switta and Sturt we won't be better overall.That’s not going to happen. The reason he has chosen us is because we’ve already promised him we’ll do what we can to make a deal.
For us supporters he is a proven X factor that we don’t have & is guaranteed to make us better.
Edit, I’m pretty sure it is partly our fault he wants to leave.
100%. We need multiple threats up forward so their defence shit themselves when it comes in hot.You know when your watching Cameron, Stengle, Pickett one out with defender and you just think, yeah, that defender is ****ed? Have you thought about anyone in our team since Ballas? We need another forward threat. Bolton is going to be massive for our transition and forward threat.
Depth is also the easiest position to fill out, half of it is coaching and using players properly.
Dangerfield was a free agent and Adelaide accepted that deal because it was better than the free agency compo.Bolton would be a good addition. Dangerfield at the same age effectively cost Geelong 9 and 28. I would suggest Dangerfield comparatively a more valuable player.
Bolton will be 26 next year and most AFL players don't go much past 30 and if they do they generally are on the decline. Mundys are the exception not the rule. Our list is youthful and strong - we don't need to squander picks in desperation. No way should we go more than one first plus trimmings.
Seems ridiculous that we always pay overs rather than market value.Bolton would be a good addition. Dangerfield at the same age effectively cost Geelong 9 and 28. I would suggest Dangerfield comparatively a more valuable player.
Bolton will be 26 next year and most AFL players don't go much past 30 and if they do they generally are on the decline. Mundys are the exception not the rule. Our list is youthful and strong - we don't need to squander picks in desperation. No way should we go more than one first plus trimmings.
Cameron, Stengle and Pickett all 700k or less and won’t cost 2x firsts and 1M per year.You know when your watching Cameron, Stengle, Pickett one out with defender and you just think, yeah, that defender is ****ed? Have you thought about anyone in our team since Ballas? We need another forward threat. Bolton is going to be massive for our transition and forward threat.
Depth is also the easiest position to fill out, half of it is coaching and using players properly.
He said bad words though so we won't touch him.There seems to be a few people on the saints board saying they'll look to cut their losses with collard and trade him out for a third rounder as he obviously doesn't want to be there.
I think the 2x1sts is to get our portion of his salary down to that 7-800k mark, if we’re paying him 1m then it’s only 1st and 27.Cameron, Stengle and Pickett all 700k or less and won’t cost 2x firsts and 1M per year.
We do enjoy f#$%ing around and inevitably finding out. One offseason where we don't lose a b23 player would be nice.I agree but like Logue we would have had the chance to extend him before the season started on much less coin.
He deserved a multi year extension after the second half of last season in my opinion.
Except for when Walker is playing on them. You hardly notice that they are playing.You know when your watching Cameron, Stengle, Pickett one out with defender and you just think, yeah, that defender is ****ed? Have you thought about anyone in our team since Ballas? We need another forward threat. Bolton is going to be massive for our transition and forward threat.
Depth is also the easiest position to fill out, half of it is coaching and using players properly.
Yuck.Gold Coast have 6,13 and 20
Freo 9,10 and 17
Richmond Bolton and Rioli
Here I go:
GC give 6, 20 get Rioli and 17 left with 13,17 values Rioli at ~8
Freo give 9,10,17 get Bolton, 20 and Richmond’s future 2nd values Bolton at ~4
Richmond give Bolton, Rioli future 2nd get 6,9,10
Sprinkle all sorts of later round picks or later round future picks around.
We still have a pick in the first round albeit the last one.
The alternative is sub out 10 for our future first, which would clearly be preferred but I think Tigers will go hard at 9 and 10.
Maybe swap 17 with our future first.
Thoughts?
For us - it means giving up 9 and 10. A 3 pick downgrade late in the first round. Getting Bolton and Richmond’s future 2nd.
It’s very unrealistic. Switta has a contract so not sure why we are giving him away while losing 3 first rounders?I just really hope we don't end the offseason with:
In: Bolton, Martin, 2nd and 3rd round Pick
Out: 9,10,17, Switkowski and Sturt
It would kill us and I don't think it's that unrealistic.
There will be many moving parts, no doubt. It'd be fun to be able to sit in on all those negotiations.I'd like to present Richmond with an array of options;
#15 & #26 = help out Bolton and take his whole contract
#10 & #26 = help Bolton and Richmond pay $300k for four years
#10 & #15 = Richmond pay $500k for two years
#9 & #10 = Richmond pay 750k for four years