Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
KANGAS HIT DANIEL ROADBLOCK
NORTH Melbourne has held preliminary discussions with the Western Bulldogs around the potential of a Caleb Daniel trade, though the Kangas believe a move for the contracted defender remains unlikely.
Daniel is reluctant to officially request a trade to Arden Street unless a suitable agreement can be reached between the two clubs, but has interest in getting to North Melbourne by Wednesday night's deadline.
However, the Kangaroos have said their initial chats with Bulldogs officials "didn't get far" and reiterated their belief that Daniel – who is contracted through until 2026 – would be retained at the Whitten Oval.
Speaking to AFL.com.au's Gettable on Friday, North Melbourne list manager Brady Rawlings said the Bulldogs hadn't yet given the Kangas an indication of what they would accept for Daniel in a trade.
"Not sure on that one," Rawlings said of a potential Daniel deal.
"We certainly have interest. (But) he's a contracted player and he's contracted for another couple of years.
"I've had a chat with the Dogs and it doesn't seem like they have much appetite at all to trade him out. We'll keep in touch, but at the end of the day he's contracted for two more years and the Dogs want to keep him." – Riley Beveridge
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
It won't be pick 24 on the nightPick 33=24?
ain't that the truth. and we get dissed for offering 61 for parker. the gall of them, Bailey humphrey a make weight for John nobleThe balls on Collingwood.
I don't pretend to know anything about how this works, but I'd trade next year's 2nd & 3rd for Parker & our priority pick (19 or whatever it is) back. It is ours after all, and we're doing them a favour for next year. Seems reasonable to me.If Sydney has academy prospects next year, shouldn't they be stockpiling multiple late rounder future picks ?
ain't that the truth. and we get dissed for offering 61 for parker. the gall of them, Bailey humphrey a make weight for John noble
We want Tauru, need to keep a top ~6 pick to get him.For the more knowledgeable draft observers… if we swung 2 to GCS for 6 & 13… could we swing 6 & our pick in the 20s for Carlton’s 12 & 14?
Would leave us with 12, 13 & 14 for 2 & 25. Too skewed for us?
Would we consider our 2 for Carlton’s 12 14 plus their future first? We could then trade one of our futures for another good pick.
Nah, we don't want to slide below 6. I think we'd look at Bombers 9 or Freo's 11 or Saints 8 with the F1 only, not GC 13.Would we consider our 2 for Carlton’s 12 14 plus their future first? We could then trade one of our futures for another good pick.
I'd rather wait and go after Bombers 9 (Kako bid will absorb it) or Freo's 11.Time to go after GC pick #13 . If the Dees have the best offer atm with F1st and this years 2nd rounder what would we have to offer to up the ante...
100%, which all but guarantees the suns won’t do that deal because they’re a ****ing basket casethat dees deal for pick 13 is the best out of that lot
100%, which all but guarantees the suns won’t do that deal because they’re a ****ing basket case
Plus we have RawlingsFor the more knowledgeable draft observers… if we swung 2 to GCS for 6 & 13… could we swing 6 & our pick in the 20s for Carlton’s 12 & 14?
Would leave us with 12, 13 & 14 for 2 & 25. Too skewed for us?
We might just think he's shitWhen they talked about interest in Konstanty, the only clubs they mentioned were Saints and *, and were leaning towards *