I can see Dees trying to trade up with us or Weagles using pick 7 or 8 plus one of their F1s.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
New interview?Blair made it sound like a pick swap is unlikely.
Sure ... but their picks will get lower with every bid matched with more than 1 pick by any team, including themselves ...Does Gold Coast have enough draft capital to get both zeke newland and Dylan Patterson?
From my calculations they have 3773
15-973
18-836
24-621
28-505
29-479
36-317
52-42
If west coast or Richmond bid they can only match 1
YesterdayNew interview?
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Nah he looked great the last month or 2 so who cares, just draft the kid, he's safe as houses
That maybe true but it's a weak draft. It's possible that most of the top 10 will be average players like in the 2020 draft.At least tag me RT if you want to have a dig.
It’s not the last month or two (it’s also technically 3 months since it was mid June). He dominated EFNL seniors in the first half of the year, then got called up mid-season to Eastern where he wasn’t just a passenger, he was their best player across all four finals in a premiership side. You don’t get that if you’re rubbish. Across the whole year he’s had maybe one down game. Calling that a “2-month purple patch” is just wrong.
Any recruiter who actually knows what they’re doing understands teenagers don’t all develop at the same rate. Puberty, growth spurts, physical maturity, they all hit at different times. Some kids are fully built at 15 and look like stars early before stalling. Others arrive later, catch up physically, and then surge past them. Tom Swift was the U16 golden boy destined to be no.1 pick and was out of the league in no time.
That’s why you weight the most recent data most heavily. It’s how analytics works in every serious field. Finance uses exponential weighting so the latest results matter more than old ones. Statistics uses Bayesian updating where new evidence shifts the model more than stale priors. Medicine, climate science, economics, all treat the freshest data as the most predictive… because it is.
And the draft media clearly get it, because every major ranking has comfortably pushed Robey into the top bracket off this season’s body of work. The only people still clinging to “2-month purple patch” lines are the ones who don’t understand how to use data.
It’s not about “lack of data” or “drafting notes”. It’s that he wasn’t even in the elite programs throughout his full junior career. There’s not the body of work there, so the risk is much higher and must factor in to some degree.
Now I’ve got that bloody song on repeat in my head.Yesterday

1. They get a discount.I don’t have enough draft knowledge to tell if Uwland and Patterson are better than Duursma and Duff-Tyler. But cal Twomey has them top 4.
Richmond’s two picks are worth 4140. Meaning even if we bid for both they can’t match
If west coast bid they are in more trouble
At least tag me RT if you want to have a dig.
It’s not the last month or two (it’s also technically 3 months since it was mid June). He dominated EFNL seniors in the first half of the year, then got called up mid-season to Eastern where he wasn’t just a passenger, he was their best player across all four finals in a premiership side. You don’t get that if you’re rubbish. Across the whole year he’s had maybe one down game. Calling that a “2-month purple patch” is just wrong.
Any recruiter who actually knows what they’re doing understands teenagers don’t all develop at the same rate. Puberty, growth spurts, physical maturity, they all hit at different times. Some kids are fully built at 15 and look like stars early before stalling. Others arrive later, catch up physically, and then surge past them. Tom Swift was the U16 golden boy destined to be no.1 pick and was out of the league in no time.
That’s why you weight the most recent data most heavily. It’s how analytics works in every serious field. Finance uses exponential weighting so the latest results matter more than old ones. Statistics uses Bayesian updating where new evidence shifts the model more than stale priors. Medicine, climate science, economics, all treat the freshest data as the most predictive… because it is.
And the draft media clearly get it, because every major ranking has comfortably pushed Robey into the top bracket off this season’s body of work. The only people still clinging to “2-month purple patch” lines are the ones who don’t understand how to use data.

Any recruiter who knows what they are doing will be very seriously questioning why has this kid come from nowhere to become the flavour of the month and it can't just simply be because he had a growth spurt.At least tag me RT if you want to have a dig.
It’s not the last month or two (it’s also technically 3 months since it was mid June). He dominated EFNL seniors in the first half of the year, then got called up mid-season to Eastern where he wasn’t just a passenger, he was their best player across all four finals in a premiership side. You don’t get that if you’re rubbish. Across the whole year he’s had maybe one down game. Calling that a “2-month purple patch” is just wrong.
Any recruiter who actually knows what they’re doing understands teenagers don’t all develop at the same rate. Puberty, growth spurts, physical maturity, they all hit at different times. Some kids are fully built at 15 and look like stars early before stalling. Others arrive later, catch up physically, and then surge past them. Tom Swift was the U16 golden boy destined to be no.1 pick and was out of the league in no time.
That’s why you weight the most recent data most heavily. It’s how analytics works in every serious field. Finance uses exponential weighting so the latest results matter more than old ones. Statistics uses Bayesian updating where new evidence shifts the model more than stale priors. Medicine, climate science, economics, all treat the freshest data as the most predictive… because it is.
And the draft media clearly get it, because every major ranking has comfortably pushed Robey into the top bracket off this season’s body of work. The only people still clinging to “2-month purple patch” lines are the ones who don’t understand how to use data.
Any recruiter who knows what they are doing will be very seriously questioning why has this kid come from nowhere to become the flavour of the month and it can't just simply be because he had a growth spurt.
There is a reason why they follow these kids from 14-15 years old and not just wait until their draft year to make decisions about them.
Blair and Geischen (Toce) would have had this year's kids ranked for a couple of years keeping tabs on how they're developing how committed they are to their footy and also their lives away from the game, so I doubt that they would be throwing all that research out the window and putting all their faith in a kid who played well for the 2nd half of his draft year after not playing any games in his bottom aged year.
So yeah they may well be impressed with how he has come from the clouds, but I have no doubt that they also have some doubts about just how good the kid can become and whether the 2nd half of the year was just a kid taking everyone by surprise or and indication of what's to come when he does get drafted.
For whatever reason, you disagree with this opinion, even straight out called it wrong and based on previous history from our recruiting team I would suggest that you are the one who is wrong.
Just look at last year. Jagga Smith was the most dominant consistent performing kid in the draft pool yet 2 kids who were impacted by injuries in their draft year were taken ahead of him in Lalor & FOS, but on you logic the current performances should have weighted more heavily than past performances but they clearly didn't. Even when it came to our later picks an injured Hotton was seen as more highly rated than a full fit Murphy Reid, Faull (injury impacted year) was rated higher than the Whitlocks who had strong consistent years.
Disagree, he is just making it clear to any club that might want it that they better pony up a kings ransom or don't waste his time. Negotiating 101.Blair made it sound like a pick swap is unlikely.
Agree - we'll get 7 or 8 from Melbourne plus GC F1 for pick 3 if they can't convince West C to give up pick 2.I'm pretty sure we will be splitting a pick and getting a future 1st in return.
Can't see any bids coming before Uwland and Patterson, all of their current picks will be wiped out. Some of them may come in by 1 spot if they hold 15 & 18 and Uwland is bid on at 2.Sure ... but their picks will get lower with every bid matched with more than 1 pick by any team, including themselves ...
You are assuming that we have had no knowledge of Robey until he blossomed.Blair and Geischen (Toce) would have had this year's kids ranked for a couple of years keeping tabs on how they're developing how committed they are to their footy and also their lives away from the game, so I doubt that they would be throwing all that research out the window and putting all their faith in a kid who played well for the 2nd half of his draft year after not playing any games in his bottom aged year.
The last of Sullivan Robey's backlog from me, here we again saw the same type of game from Sullivan that he delivered just about every time prior to his move into the midfield through the finals. He again showed his elite and clean hands in marking contests, work rate to present up the ground, and ability to hit the scoreboard with a couple of goals. His kicking was off here, perhaps effected by the strong wind but also a bit erratic with his ball drop.
No current season stats available
