Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
But instead of getting to pick from the best of the remaining bunch we slip down to 6th best.If we liked someone left, why would we pick them today and have to put them on the main list if we can instead put them on the rookie list tomorrow and only have to commit to the single year?
If you only rate the talent on offer at rookie interest it makes sense.What's our chances of taking one of these guys tomorrow? Given that we just elected to pass on all of them, given the chance.
Makes no sense to me
Oliver GreevesWhat's our chances of taking one of these guys tomorrow? Given that we just elected to pass on all of them, given the chance.
Makes no sense to me
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
With all the players we had out last year Watkins still couldn’t get a game.Oliver Greeves
Liam Hetherton
Noah Hibbins-Hargreaves
Leon Kickett
Taj Murray
Riley Onley
Blake Oudshoorn-Bennier
Fred Rodriguez
Out of these players, I wouldn't mind getting in order of preference BOB, Kickett, NHH, Oliver Greeves, Riley Onley, Fred Rodriguez, Taj Murray, Liam Hetherton.
Let's not get Watkins if we're only intending on rookie listing him just to keep Butters and then de-list him.
He wasn't AFL listed how was he supposed to get a game? we didn't pick him in the msd, he's fine as a contracted SANFL player that's his wheelhouse.With all the players we had out last year Watkins still couldn’t get a game.
You wouldn’t expect us to have as bad run again this year so for me it’s pointless in keeping him.
How can Gold Coast still have picks 48 and 49 after matching 4 x first round bids? Surely that's an error.
We should be at 60 (the others don't matter)
Gold Coast give away picks 7 and 8 for Petracca and still get 4 x first round picks.

No point in asking for a medical when he is going to reject it.They said on the trade show tonight that no team has asked about him or requested any medical.
Twomey was 100% sure he will go to the crows tomorrow.
+ Veterans list removal right in time for ebert, Westhoff, boak and Gray after watching Hawthorn and Geelong utiltise it for the previous decadeI love how it’s this sort of sh¡t that happens pretty much every year that gets waved through with minimal grumbling because ‘academies are good for the future health of the game!’,
But it’ll be us getting Cochrane and Pilot after copping sweet f-ck all by way of startup concessions, priority picks, father-sons, free agency compo, andWADA compo— not to mention being gutted throughout the 80’s and 90’s supplying the code with all-time greats in exchange for a half-eaten yiros — that’ll tear the entire superstructure down.
![]()
I forgot about him not being AFL listed but still believe we would do better rookie listing someone else and as you say leave him on the SANFL list.He wasn't AFL listed how was he supposed to get a game? we didn't pick him in the msd, he's fine as a contracted SANFL player that's his wheelhouse.
With all the players we had out last year Watkins still couldn’t get a game.
You wouldn’t expect us to have as bad run again this year so for me it’s pointless in keeping him.
Yep I forgot that but still believe we should keep it that way and look at rookie listing someone else.Watkins was not on our AFL list last year. He was only a Magpies listed player
Yep I forgot that but still believe we should keep it that way and look at rookie listing someone else.
Tbrh, I am very sceptical on Stephenson. Not about his quality but the fact that he could be someone that seems to fall in and out of love with the game.If they didn't think anyone left was worth drafting, why would you do that? Take one new rookie, probably a local not much point relocating an interstater if you don't think they're up to it. Rookie Oudshoorn-Bennier and Watkins, look at the train-ons for the last spot. Although Stephenson would be firming for that last spot if he shows dedication to making a comeback.
As Andy said it’s only a one year contract as a rookie on less money instead of a two year contract on bigger money on the main list.If they didn't think anyone left was worth drafting, why would you do that? Take one new rookie, probably a local not much point relocating an interstater if you don't think they're up to it. Rookie Oudshoorn-Bennier and Watkins, look at the train-ons for the last spot. Although Stephenson would be firming for that last spot if he shows dedication to making a comeback.
We didn’t want the original Murphy Reid so doubt will take a copy

Tbrh, I am very sceptical on Stephenson. Not about his quality but the fact that he could be someone that seems to fall in and out of love with the game.
If it were totally up to me, I'd draft BOB, NHH and Watkins tomorrow. NHH is a very similar mould to Stephenson, my only concern with him is injuries but otherwise, kid imo would've been a top 20 prospect.
I’m still bitter Lai didn’t debut this year. He was on track until he suffered an injury.We drafted josh lai as a train-on player out of nowhere and his form in the sanfl especially the 2nd half of the year was incredible.
no point guaranteeing players 50 plus range in a shit draft more years and money then harrison ramm and josh lai

Assume you mean one new rookie in addition to Watkins but yes agreeAs Parker said, they'll let the new coaching group look at the players and they might have different ideas about positions. They're going to keep a spot open for an SSP selection with train ons, so I expect only one new rookie tomorrow.
Had a look at NHH highlights, he would fill the same role as Stephenson.
Yep. If you don't perform you should be out.Lai should have played all 10 games Evans was given this year.