Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
More. We'll probably need to use 2028 and 2029 draft currency based on the current rules.We're investing 3 years of drafts into 3 players basically (Cochrane, Pilot and Salopek).
It's a huge risk... Hope it doesn't leave a huge hole in our list.
There’s also the possibility of at least two first rounds picks if Butters leaves.More. We'll probably need to use 2028 and 2029 draft currency based on the current rules.
Could be investing 5 years draft picks into that batch.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Its not end of the world tbh, probably had some intel that the following would get through based on how it panned out (listed in order of my preference):
BOB
Greeves
Kickett
Rodriguez
Hibbins-Hargraves
Hetherton
Obviously the advantage now is you pay them less as a rookie rather than senior spot.
The interesting thing now is, I believe we must have 36 senior spots filled and currently we only have 35 (after 3 elevations). So one more Rookie A will be promoted out of Liddy, Mackinlay, Walsh and Evans. Unless I've gotten the rules wrong.
60 picks in and he's still there.
Guess no one else likes him.
Not even Hawthon who tried to NGA him.
I would say Port's list is stronger automatically considering the players Port drafted in the past few years were average and got delisted.Alarming thing for me is that clubs with much stronger lists than ours still took players. This included clubs that had traded in quality too.
History tells us that we can’t be the only club who got it right and the other 17 got it wrong.
Maybe we’re just self-traumatised by recent McCallum-Scully-Marshall and Anastasopoulos-Charleson-Lorenz draft experiences, and prefer to make judgement on players who we actually see train with us for a while.
Still, no-one can accuse us of strengthening our list in Carr’s first post-season.
If we liked someone left, why would we pick them today and have to put them on the main list if we can instead put them on the rookie list tomorrow and only have to commit to the single year?If we liked any of the players that got through we would have picked them instead of passing.
As stated before we have given away good picks for missing pieces in Hinkley’s puzzle.Alarming thing for me is that clubs with much stronger lists than ours still took players. This included clubs that had traded in quality too.
History tells us that we can’t be the only club who got it right and the other 17 got it wrong.
Maybe we’re just self-traumatised by recent McCallum-Scully-Marshall and Anastasopoulos-Charleson-Lorenz draft experiences, and prefer to make judgement on players who we actually see train with us for a while.
Still, no-one can accuse us of strengthening our list in Carr’s first post-season.
Rookie same time tomorrow ?
If Rome Burgoyne's name was Billy Bubkins you wouldn't even mention him he's basically shown nothing.As ive pointed out a few times before, given the position of our list, with so many players already contracted past next year and with a really tight and limited list of options for delisting, selecting more players thatd be on 1 year deals, does make some sense.
I'm personally happy to boost up our depth across the board rather than pumping the list with more pick 60s that just waste space as we have done the last few years.
Interested to see if we grab any kids tomorrow, but I still feel Watkins and Rome Burgoyne could be a chance.
That’s 1210pm for me, better get the cheese toasties on early.Starts at 2.40pm
They said on the trade show tonight that no team has asked about him or requested any medical.Jokes aside, are we a chance for selecting achee? Any inside word on if the club met with him or did any DD?
Unlikely. Doubt port would risk upsetting his manager, and jeopardise our salary cap plans that are in place for future targets for a let’s face it an average playerJokes aside, are we a chance for selecting achee? Any inside word on if the club met with him or did any DD?
And also his NWM's manager if I'm not mistaken right? Don't want to burn bridges with player managers after all.Unlikely. Doubt port would risk upsetting his manager, and jeopardise our salary cap plans that are in place for future targets for a let’s face it an average player
Was outstanding this year in the SANFL. Was being picked as a priority over others in the SANFL when we were nearly fully stacked too. Could certainly have played AFL on a half back this year. Fundamentally in the same position as Ramm, both skipped over and played good SANFL footy.If Rome Burgoyne's name was Billy Bubkins you wouldn't even mention him he's basically shown nothing.
It seems no one in the AFL thinks so just you.Could certainly have played AFL on a half back this year.