- Moderator
- #3,687
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
McGuane will be lucky to play a game. Not a need for us at all.Wouldn’t be opposed to picking up McGuane as a (rookie list) f/s prospect and having him string up 200-odd games at the blues
Given we paid 1st and 4th round picks to get all of 3 games from Mcguane senior, would be good to improve the return on investment from some 30 years ago…
I am not a draft watcher and certainly wasn’t being serious - just liked entertaining the thought of the melts on the pies board if that were to happenMcGuane will be lucky to play a game. Not a need for us at all.

Zero Hanger have some articles that read like they've been spat out by ChatGPT, but in particularly their advertising content is almost overwhelming within the context of a single article page.That is so much amateur hour. They have WC gift pick in front of our end of first. Nah. Let alone some misguided picks. So much of the media stuff is more “out there” than the Big Footy nuffie projections on here.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Very unlikely unless we hear that the changes to matching/DVI has been delayed until Tassie comes in.With Dean and Ison needing points is there a chance we have a pick at all in the top 25? Would love Dovaston
It still wouldn’t, because even under the current system, we will need the pointsThat would allow us to move our 2026 1st.
Would have to be highly dependent on the Curnow potential trade, we may have some extra picks in this draft and following year.Very unlikely unless we hear that the changes to matching/DVI has been delayed until Tassie comes in.
That would allow us to move our 2026 1st.
Yeah same, probably more than anyone else in the 12-25 range. Getting Dean Dovaston and Ison would be greatWith Dean and Ison needing points is there a chance we have a pick at all in the top 25? Would love Dovaston
Teams would offer us a lot for our 2026 first if Curnow leaves as they'd expect us to drop dramatically on the ladder and its a very weak draft.It still wouldn’t, because even under the current system, we will need the points
Teams would offer us a lot for our 2026 first if Curnow leaves as they'd expect us to drop dramatically on the ladder and its a very weak draft.
No reason we wouldn't be able to split the pick for points in 2026 as well as a mid 20s pick to get Dovaston if we were desperate to get him.
Personally not that big a fan of him compared to other smalls in previous years but it would be very doable if the AFL delayed the rule changes.
DisagreeIf rules don't change... we still keep our first...
especially if we lose Charlie ffs... we'll be bottom 3... and even if we're not, that 1st pick can always be moved next year...
Would be the dumbest thing this football club does if they trade our F1 this year. Thankfully, not even they can screw that up!
Disagree
We'll be getting assets back for Charlie, and no... I can't see us being worse than WCE, North, Essendon, Richmond, Dees etc.So, Charlie makes Sydney a flag favourite... but losing him doesn't drop us a few spots on the ladder?
We'll be getting assets back for Charlie, and no... I can't see us being worse than WCE, North, Essendon, Richmond, Dees etc.
You've been deathriding us for months so I'm not really interested in going over the same arguments over and over. Imo theres no chance of us getting an extra pick along with Cody so if no changes are made to the DVI we'd be able to trade that pick back and potentially target a slider in this draft if we deemed them a suitable target. Likelihood is that won't happen so the argument is irrelevant anyway.Who's etc?
The bulk of the return for Charlie will be draft picks... sure Hayward will help, but he's not kicking, say 60 goals.
North are a chance to leapfrog us. Dees are very similar to us, 50/50 who finishes above who at this stage.
Like I said, even if you're right and we don't finish bottom 3, it will still be an early pick and we can still trade it next year... so the point stands that it would be extremely dumb to trade it this year... unless we get a godfather offer (which we won't).
Each to their own, you've been deathriding us for months so I'm not really interested in going over the same arguments over and over.
I have my opinion, you have your own.
As I said, I have no interest going over this again.Being based about where our list is, isn't death riding...
Saying that we should strategise to take full advantage of next year's draft isn't death riding either.
Wanting to finish 13th instead of 18th to preserve some imaginary winning cultcha that hasn't existed at this place for the better part of the last 25 years only serves to weaken our position to reset the list quicker.
Writing is on the wall with Voss... as it is with most of the playing group...
End of 26 season, we will be hunting for a new coach, and we will be looking to off load a lot of the 30+ year olds.
...And if we do finish higher on the ladder, it makes trading our first rounder that year even sillier given the Cody Walker situation.So, Charlie makes Sydney a flag favourite... but losing him doesn't drop us a few spots on the ladder?
...And if we do finish higher on the ladder, it makes trading our first rounder that year even sillier given the Cody Walker situation.
People don't realise that to make an omelette, you have to break a few eggs, then when they want to make another omelette they wonder where the eggs went. Moral of the story - it's imperative we trade Charlie for more 'eggs'.
"He's not going to go in the top 17"![]()
Carlton's father-son talent that could land in the top five
The 2025 National Draft is just around the corner.www.sen.com.au
Mick would have less incentive to slag us off in his column if his son was on the list.Wouldn’t be opposed to picking up McGuane as a (rookie list) f/s prospect and having him string up 200-odd games at the blues
Given we paid 1st and 4th round picks to get all of 3 games from Mcguane senior, would be good to improve the return on investment from some 30 years ago…