- Moderator
- #3,687
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

BigFooty AFLW Notice Img
AFLW 2025 - AFLW Trade and Draft - All the player moves
Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
If WCE bid on Dean at 2 (they won't), they can keep him (temporarily).
I'd be happy to walk away with two top 15 picks and come back for Dean after WCE has paid for his development years.
It would be near impossible to get a better deal without dealing with West Coast.But surely they know we won't just use 9 & 11 to match but will look to trade out those picks to clubs with multiple 2nds for extra points and additional pick/s next year. No benefit to WC and they take the risk (albeit very low) that we don't match.
If I was West Coast I’d be bidding on Patterson and Uwland 1 and 2, hoping that they do actually get one of them.There's risk in that approach from WC, too.
Sure, they could just go down the list of F/S and Academy's at pick 1 and screw over everyone. Annable, Ewland, Patterson, Dean. But they run the risk of a club not matching the bid and them ending up with a player they might not actually want.
And then the next time WC have a prospect they will be reaping what they have sewed, and all the clubs they screw over will be out for them.
It's a delicate balance. I'd be surprised if they bid on Dean at 2, just because it seems he's just not THAT good.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Thought it would be interesting to do some guesswork at scenarios for our draft hand, given how likely it is we are trading our first round picks.
Scenario 1:
Bid on Dean between pick 1-4 (live picks excluding bids)
Match with 9 & 11, use the leftover pick to match Ison, take a third player late in the draft.
Looks like: Bid at pick 3 (1960 to match) match with pick 10 and 12, get pick 30 back.
Scenario 1a:
Bid on Dean between pick 1-4 (live picks excluding bids)
Offer for a trade down to get more points. Match and take Ison and a third player late.
Looks like: Bid at pick 3, trade 10 to WCE for 14 and 32 (assuming Uwland bid at 2 and match).
Match bid with 12, 14 get pick 39 back
Scenario 2:
Bid on Dean 5 - 9
Trade out 9 for more points, match with 11 and take a player before Ison if possible. At this point other bids are likely to have occured and to bring our later picks in a bit, which gives us more options.
Looks like: Bid at 6 (1493 to match) (Uwland, Annable, Patterson bids already) Trade pick 12 for pick 15 and pick 30. Match with pick 14 and pick 15 get pick 29 back. Probably consider other trades for more optimal use.
Scenario 3
No bid on Dean before 9 (live pick 9, excluding bids).
Two obvious schools of thought.
Trade out of draft to get more first round picks next year, confident we can match Dean with 11
Looks like: Trade pick 9 for future 1st, maybe Adelaide? And current second rounder
Draft a player before Dean. Depends on who is available and how we rate them
Looks like Sam Cumming + Harry Dean (w/ pick 11) + Jack Ison (w/ later picks and whatever is left over from Dean match)
Scenario 4:
No Dean bid before 11.
At this point you either trade back and try and get some value elsewhere (next year or in this draft) or you just draft him.
Ideally you can trade.
there will certainly be elements of a game of chicken going on - and multiple opportunities for the good carlton people of bigfooty to throw the toys out of the cot... this is going to be tricky with a capital T - the good news has to be uwland, patterson, annable, robey, duursma are just more useful in the short term to west coast and the tiges - the dean bid is plain silly for themI think trading 9+11 for an F1 + points to match bids, is the most likely scenario and doesnt require a bid after 9 to happen. A bid from 4 onwards should make this possible, although 6-7 would give us more breathing room.
Brilliant draft sim made by Pommy in Oz
Didn't one of the other youtubers create that? Thought I saw one of them on Blue Abroad who had created it.
No that was Sotaram's version which was different.Didn't one of the other youtubers create that? Thought I saw one of them on Blue Abroad who had created it.
Either way, it's fantastic.
Good on him, seems a great resource.No that was Sotaram's version which was different.
This is POMs own program and he has opened it up for anyone to use for free. Only person to openly share their program out to the public
Will it allow us to draft Cody with pick#14/16 in advance (well placed glitch)….?No that was Sotaram's version which was different.
This is POMs own program and he has opened it up for anyone to use for free. Only person to openly share their program out to the public. Absolute legend
POMs version is the only version to correctly match bids and correctly burn the picks that the bid has created. If that makes sense.
So you should notice when you play around with it youll see our 2nd pick will be a better pick than other draft guru's account for as they havent burnt the pick as they should
No that was Sotaram's version which was different.
This is POMs own program and he has opened it up for anyone to use for free. Only person to openly share their program out to the public. Absolute legend
POMs version is the only version to correctly match bids and correctly burn the picks that the bid has created. If that makes sense.
So you should notice when you play around with it youll see our 2nd pick will be a better pick than other draft guru's account for as they havent burnt the pick as they should
Great work by Pommy.No that was Sotaram's version which was different.
This is POMs own program and he has opened it up for anyone to use for free. Only person to openly share their program out to the public. Absolute legend
POMs version is the only version to correctly match bids and correctly burn the picks that the bid has created. If that makes sense.
So you should notice when you play around with it youll see our 2nd pick will be a better pick than other draft guru's account for as they havent burnt the pick as they should
And the most important part, especially for us is its correct with bid matches which Sotarams isnt unfortunatelyGreat work by Pommy.
It's not as fully featured as Sotaram's, but it's a lot cleaner. And it's available.
Kudos Pommy!
Agree, even if Bombers bid on Dean with their 2nd pick we still get pick 14Here’s how I see it playing out:
Draft:
- Melbourne will be the first to bite on Dean, which pushes us back to Pick 14.
- West Coast (WCE) will bid on Uwland at #2. They’ll walk away with Duursma and CDT.
- Richmond will bid on Annable and Patterson, ending up with X. Taylor and Robey.
- Essendon won’t bid - our alliance against AFL injustice holds strong! Plus, Dean isn’t a pressing need for them. They’ll likely take Sharp and Cumming.
- Melbourne, as mentioned, bids on Dean and ends up with Schubert and Farrow.
- Hawthorn will grab whichever of Farrow/Grlj Melbourne doesn’t select.
Which leaves us with a choice between:
Dovaston, Marsh, Lindsay … or we trade out to 2026 and pick up some later points for Ison.
If it's a Melbourne bid - or later - then we can trade ahead.Here’s how I see it playing out:
Draft:
- Melbourne will be the first to bite on Dean, which pushes us back to Pick 14.
- West Coast (WCE) will bid on Uwland at #2. They’ll walk away with Duursma and CDT.
- Richmond will bid on Annable and Patterson, ending up with X. Taylor and Robey.
- Essendon won’t bid - our alliance against AFL injustice holds strong! Plus, Dean isn’t a pressing need for them. They’ll likely take Sharp and Cumming.
- Melbourne, as mentioned, bids on Dean and ends up with Schubert and Farrow.
- Hawthorn will grab whichever of Farrow/Grlj Melbourne doesn’t select.
Which leaves us with a choice between:
Dovaston, Marsh, Lindsay … or we trade out to 2026 and pick up some later points for Ison.
Which leaves us with a choice between:
Dovaston, Marsh, Lindsay … or we trade out to 2026 and pick up some later points for Ison.

and you can throw Moir in for good measure !!Jordan RidleyI watch the draft closely and Dean is ahead of all those guys, except maybe Naughton. Tauru was very raw and drafted more on athleticism. Balta and Taylor were taken in the 20s. SDK and Cox not as well performed as Dean.
Denver Granger Barras was a good prospect but think Dean is better. DGB always struggled 1 on 1, which isnt ideal for a KPD prospect.
No KPD prospect since Weitering that I would take over Dean.
Cox? Ratugolea? Petty? Pretty experienced players and none of them have come close to that elite levelJordan Ridley
Josh Battle
Tom Stewart
Brennan Cox
Esava Ratagulea
Noah Balta
Sam Taylor
Harrison Petty
Sam De Koning
Zach Reid
Mac Andrew
Max Michalanney
All drafted after Weitering who have every chance to be classified as elite/A grade defender with the potential of being better than Dean.
At the age of them being drafted none of these players were comparable to Dean this year. Stewart not even a KPD, nor are Ridley or Michalanney.Jordan Ridley
Josh Battle
Tom Stewart
Brennan Cox
Esava Ratagulea
Noah Balta
Sam Taylor
Harrison Petty
Sam De Koning
Zach Reid
Mac Andrew
Max Michalanney
All drafted after Weitering who have every chance to be classified as elite/A grade defender with the potential of being better than Dean.
Genuine question, as I've only seen the videos, but what was wrong with Sotaram's version?And the most important part, especially for us is its correct with bid matches which Sotarams isnt unfortunately