Remove this Banner Ad

List Mgmt. 2025 List Management Discussion - Part IV

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.
:stkilda:
2025 List Management Discussion - Part 4

Now that our season is over, and news is starting to break - it's time for a fresh thread.

This thread is to discuss all things list management - trades, draft, free agency, delistings and more.
As we are now officially in our off-season, we'll be wanting to keep this thread more strictly on-topic than the previous iterations.
Be respectful. You are allowed to disagree with someone - but play the ball, not the man. Repeat offenders will have their posting rights revoked.

Thanks to Lore once again for this incredibly useful spreadsheet.

2025 KEY DATES
Free Agency Period:
Friday, October 3rd - Friday, October 10th
Trade Period: Monday, October 6th - Wednesday, October 15th
AFL Draft: Wednesday, November 19th - Thursday, November 20th

See Also:
🔸 2025 Year in Review 🔸 Rumours & Confirmed Movements 🔸 2025 Draft Discussion 🔸

 
Last edited:
will ferrell snl GIF
Or the air raid siren at Essendon games :tearsofjoy:
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

My word, if there's a chance we bring in Humphrey I think I'll need a lie down. Have Gubby and SoS been doing their sneakies behind the scenes for months with him too? 🤔

Mystery mid? 🧐

Flanders and Humphrey from the Suns would be gif heaven 🤓

View attachment 2449549
Not keen on bringing in players who refuse to wear pants...... Just saying
 
Last time I say it. You can’t force a player to sit out (or retire for that matter) if they think they can get back to play.

Given that players income can be tied to games played -both AFL & VFL - you’d open yourself up to more than just media scrutiny, you’d be on the end of a breach of employment law.

Boy oh boy. No, there were not. Categorically.

This is ridiculous lol.

Players can suffer setbacks in injury return - do you know the medical assessments at the time were wrong?

And even if they were wrong, so what? There was still no way in knowing King would be out for the season at the time of the MSD.

And your Cordy argument? Absolute rubbish chat. You can't retire a player against their will.
King - At the time of the mid season draft he was listed as TBC - so the club NFI when he was going to be available.

We gambled on him becoming available - we lost - so missed a chance to enter the mid season draft.

Cordy - Of course you can't retire a player against their will but there's nothing to stop you make serious efforts to "entice" a player to retire if you believe it would have been in the interests of the club.

Cordy was listed as 8 weeks before he'd even be fit enough to be considered and was an absolute monty to be delisted at the end of the year.

So we didn't do enough to "entice" him to retire early so we missed a chance to enter the mid season draft.

So we did have ways of entering the mid season draft if we weren't aggressive enough about it.

Here's the two players I'd have been chasing if we had a spot.


 
King - At the time of the mid season draft he was listed as TBC - so the club NFI when he was going to be available.

We gambled on him becoming available - we lost - so missed a chance to enter the mid season draft.

Cordy - Of course you can't retire a player against their will but there's nothing to stop you make serious efforts to "entice" a player to retire if you believe it would have been in the interests of the club.

Cordy was listed as 8 weeks before he'd even be fit enough to be considered and was an absolute monty to be delisted at the end of the year.

So we didn't do enough to "entice" him to retire early so we missed a chance to enter the mid season draft.

So we did have ways of entering the mid season draft if we weren't aggressive enough about it.

Here's the two players I'd have been chasing if we had a spot.


Negative. This is all wrong.

Go read page 99 onwards on the AFL rules, link here: https://resources.afl.com.au/afl/do...nded-AFL-Rules-effective-28-February-2023.pdf

King needs to agree to go on the LTI and the AFL need to be satisfied by the medical report.

As for Cordy, as if a bloke is going to retire when he wants to fight for his career.

Also, no LTI can be changed after Round 18, so there is another hole in your grand plan.

So, no, you just look silly, my man.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Giving away pick 7 for a player seems like the magic beans approach where we think we are close to prelims and just need to top up. Anyhew the die is cast now.

Absolutely not imo.

People overate draft picks way to much

Pick 7 which becomes pick 12 in a weak draft is absolutely fair deal for a very good player
 
Last edited:
Harry Boyd, MSD & Zaine Cordy chat!!!!! Jesus Christ 😂😂😂😂
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

He has no where near the pace of Biclavs. Biclavs was in 400m qualifying trials for Australia for 2012 Olympics. And that is Biclavs major strength, his ability to get around the ground quickly. Marshall would be lucky to win an egg race.
No but he will go into the ruck and can play forward.
 
King - At the time of the mid season draft he was listed as TBC - so the club NFI when he was going to be available.

We gambled on him becoming available - we lost - so missed a chance to enter the mid season draft.

Cordy - Of course you can't retire a player against their will but there's nothing to stop you make serious efforts to "entice" a player to retire if you believe it would have been in the interests of the club.

Cordy was listed as 8 weeks before he'd even be fit enough to be considered and was an absolute monty to be delisted at the end of the year.

So we didn't do enough to "entice" him to retire early so we missed a chance to enter the mid season draft.

So we did have ways of entering the mid season draft if we weren't aggressive enough about it.

Here's the two players I'd have been chasing if we had a spot.


So you add Archer May. Which of our contracted players are you delisting this offseason to make way for him? Or which of our recruits are you not pursuing?
 
Giving away pick 7 for a player seems like the magic beans approach where we think we are close to prelims and just need to top up. Anyhew the die is cast now.

Flanders has shown proven elite talent, is only 24 and is the type of midfielder we have been crying out for who has been played out of position. We will look back on this trade in years to come and say it was an absolute bargain.
 
Giving away pick 7 for a player seems like the magic beans approach where we think we are close to prelims and just need to top up. Anyhew the die is cast now.

Isn’t swapping pick 7 for a player how draft picks work regardless?

The core question is; is Flanders better than what we could get in the 2025 draft

Gut says yes right now tbh…..
 
The bloke suffered a workplace injury.

What he is paid is irrelevant (& its not near $1m now anyway).

He's not the face of our next flag push at all. Nas & co have taken that mantel.

He was tracking better than the majority of other tall forwards before Dougal threw his tantrum (well ahead of Hawkins, etc at the same point.)

His body language & he sucked defensively when he was playing injured & couldn't move (so would you if a sh!tman like Griffen Logue was manhandling you).

He doesn't owe us anything.
And I would imagine that no matter how frustrated we are, he would be so much more so.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top