I’m going to ask you both one question.
IF money is so important.
Why is it supposedly going to cost us MORE to retain Nas and in LESS YEARS than what it will cost for him to go to an SA club?
Isn’t that statement backwards?
Whilst simultaneously the club had an agreement and then Ben Williams walked back the state of play within the last 3 weeks.
Doesn’t that statement point to a bigger issue at play?
Dude
You said Nas has agreed to stay, and that his manager is trying to squeeze more money out of us. I said Nas has a say in what his manager is doing. I don't see that as being complicated... at all.
And I'll say it again.... as I've said over and over...anyone who thinks the money we've been throwing at the likes of TDK won't influence how our current players feel going into their own negotiations is straight up trippin'. It just human nature.
To me, the club needed to identify who of our current group they wanted to take us forward, and do everything they could to lock them down before dick swingin' this war chest to every half decent player outside the club they perceived as gettable.
Last edited:





