I feel for Geelong, they really deserve another player like BontTalk of him looking at Geelong. Probably a BS rumour still. Surely even Cotton On couldn't afford him.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
I feel for Geelong, they really deserve another player like BontTalk of him looking at Geelong. Probably a BS rumour still. Surely even Cotton On couldn't afford him.
I hope to god your wife does your household budget.I think they know how to Math mate and if they offered this money knowing TDK & Aleer are coming + signing nas etc then they knew how to fit the guy in.
Outside of that, I couldn’t care about who gets paid what in what year and for how long.
If it became an issue, I’d kick that can when it did.
His wife will have to do your day job too with the amount of time you spend in here deary oh deary me!I hope to god your wife does your household budget.
Any combination of those three guys as two would have made them the highest paid combination of ANY two players in the league… by about $400k. Not just in a single team, the whole league and you’re hand waving it away with some “front or back” end it.
There’s no ****ing way the Rowell talk was real, it can’t have been, even without Aleer (who at $750 a year is the least of our problems in that scenario)
You jumping up and down saying is impossible doesn’t make that real either.I hope to god your wife does your household budget.
Any combination of those three guys as two would have made them the highest paid combination of ANY two players in the league… by about $400k. Not just in a single team, the whole league and you’re hand waving it away with some “front or back” end it.
There’s no ****ing way the Rowell talk was real, it can’t have been, even without Aleer (who at $750 a year is the least of our problems in that scenario)
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
And how do you know this, serious questionWe have enough money for Aleer on $750k, Nas on whatever he wants, TDK on $1.8m AND Rowell (understanding he’s not coming) on $2m, none of these deals were or are at the expense of the other.
Have we had a crack?Yep.
Ok.What do you think “how he looks” means?
That’s perception, not how he actually is.
My post defended him as a captain but noted how he is viewed (which is something that’s been discussion by saints and non saints a like).

Okay ill put it another way for you.You jumping up and down saying is impossible doesn’t make that real either.
Let’s move on now
Well the Pres said before the year started that not only would we be only paying 95% of the TPP this year, the only way we were getting that close was by front ending existing contracts and any incoming new contracts.And how do you know this, serious question
Contract of 2 mill a year and 2 mill front loaded for 2 years, as suggested by littlecreatures , is a different thing though. If I’m understanding it correctly.If Port and Adelaide are paying 2mill a year the trade will have to be in relevant value to that money.
FWIW both don't have the capital to make it happen and NAS seems happy at the saints.
I’ve resorted to OCD, I flick the lights on and off minimum 40 times before bed thinking it’ll have a bearing on whether NAS signs.Bit over it to be honest.
Thanks for the two paragraphs but you can shove the last one where the sun don't shineWell the Pres said before the year started that not only would we only paying 95% of the TPP, the only way we were getting that close was by front ending existing contracts and any incoming new contracts.
TPP has gone up by $2M this year alone - I think we have the readies.
Byrnes and Jones back in?

We’d need a Melbourne Storm set of books by the sounds of it.Okay ill put it another way for you.
If our top 11 players are getting $11,300,000 (NAS, TDK, Rowell plus the 8) and our 35 OTHER players get $300k each (which id note is $160k UNDER the league average done to generously account for the top end being so ****ing disproportionate) our TPP is $21.8m.
So you think we can front or back end our way out of what equates to a nearly $7m a year hole ($4m in 2027 when the TPP increases).
Bruv, it cannot be done, i dont care how ****ing creative you get with the books.
Anyway, ive made my point, if anyone still seriously thinks we offered Rowell $2m a year head to that NAS thread on the main board, youll fit right in.
They don't it's nigh impossible and there is no way through the PSD.Correct. 100%.
But how else do they get the capital to do a trade?
Players could be traded to other clubs and then those draft picks are transferred to Saints. That is also another option.
But clubs that don’t have the necessary draft picks are limited in their options.
Speaking of Stan I reckon I’ll need to remortgage the house at this rate once I add on Stan Sport for the EPL.Anyway if you want something to watch while we wait for Nas to sign or run Mr Mercedes on STAN is well worth watching
Well, going by the recent Port poster, we “don’t deserve him” so we should just hand him over for nothing, I guessI cant speak for the crows but the port supporters have essentially said hands off any player even remotely valuable from Vic in that Nas thread.
The overwhelming sentiment from saints fans is they dont have the draft capital alone (thats both)

Your maths is all wrong. You're using averages not the median totals.Okay ill put it another way for you.
If our top 11 players are getting $11,300,000 (NAS, TDK, Rowell plus the 8) and our 35 OTHER players get $300k each (which id note is $160k UNDER the league average done to generously account for the top end being so ****ing disproportionate) our TPP is $21.8m.
So you think we can front or back end our way out of what equates to a nearly $7m a year hole ($4m in 2027 when the TPP increases).
Bruv, it cannot be done, i dont care how ****ing creative you get with the books.
Anyway, ive made my point, if anyone still seriously thinks we offered Rowell $2m a year head to that NAS thread on the main board, youll fit right in.
Only if you then assume that the remaining players are all worth the league average (which accounts for the rookie salaries given it’s about $460k which would be the average between $100k minimum and the $600-$800k guys).Your maths is all wrong. You're using averages not the median totals.
We have selected 14 players in the draft in the last 2 years (1/3 of the total list) - the most any of them can earn is about $160k a year and most of them earning less than $130k. So 1 huge salary = 14 players
So take out those outliers and you are left with us spending $14M on 30 players - and that ends up with players earning the league average.
Brendan Gleeson is incredible, as always. Really good show.Anyway if you want something to watch while we wait for Nas to sign or run Mr Mercedes on STAN is well worth watching
Still 2millContract of 2 mill a year and 2 mill front loaded for 2 years, as suggested by littlecreatures , is a different thing though. If I’m understanding it correctly.
Don't you want to pay NAS 2.5 mill?Only if you then assume that the remaining players are all worth the league average (which accounts for the rookie salaries given it’s about $460k which would be the average between $100k minimum and the $600-$800k guys).
I also roughly accounted for the top end guys by dropping the average salary down to $300k (not the $460k actual leave average).
You’re also not at all accounting for any of those guys getting increases at all, which was really my point.
You can tweak the numbers around in increments and the hole might reduce a touch but no team can account for the three highest contracts in the league.
Maybe we can get those three but something else has to give, we either lose a stack of the kids or a fair chunk of the mid range guys.
It’s the Carlton list problem only about 10 times worse.
Maybe marshall and Steele?Yeh mate, I’ve done this
NAS and TDK - doable
NAS and Rowell - doable
TDK and Rowell - doable
NAS, TDK and Rowell - ****ed