- Thread starter
- Moderator
- #5,203
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
If he commits to other mob he’s not making a u turn and vise versa. Just my opinion.Why would he leave if we matched?
I'm in the camp that would trade up if feasible. Duursma, Dean, Ison, in addition to Jagga, HOF, and fingers crossed Cody help sets us up for more sustainable successI'm not really buying into any of it.
There only seems to be two strains of thinking around here. 1. Reshape the list with yet more average players who might (just might) happen to have some of the traits we are looking for, while drafting the FS/academy players as a matter of course. 2. Trade in some big name whilst somehow gathering enough points to draft the FS/academy players as a matter of course.
There is not much talk about building a side with multitude strengths or preparing for the future, if we don't somehow manage to rise up the ladder to be contenders in the next three years. There's no such thing as an AFL handicap for the sides who are better than us.
Ueah but he is still goneThanks champ. Until it's announced, we can still speculate and hypothesise without these sorts of "contributions".

Log in to remove this Banner Ad
St Kilda get to make an official offer once the season is over and Carlton get to match the offer if the Club wants to keep TDK - or not. Right now it is all just "blah blah blah"If he commits to other mob he’s not making a u turn and vise versa. Just my opinion.
No current season stats available
Having a game-plan based on the side you inherit is one thing, but for a HC in the job 5-10 years, the aim is to gradually evolve the game-plan as you turn over your list, addressing the deficiencies as you go, continually dropping out your weakest links and bringing in the best available player to address that deficiency.I'm not really buying into any of it.
There only seems to be two strains of thinking around here. 1. Reshape the list with yet more average players who might (just might) happen to have some of the traits we are looking for, while drafting the FS/academy players as a matter of course. 2. Trade in some big name whilst somehow gathering enough points to draft the FS/academy players as a matter of course.
There is not much talk about building a side with multitude strengths or preparing for the future, if we don't somehow manage to rise up the ladder to be contenders in the next three years. There's no such thing as an AFL handicap for the sides who are better than us.
Hard to not see us bottom 4 next season.If Mcgovern and JSoS go for different reasons. One wants out and the other is being pushed it leaves the defence high and dry in 2026 unless austin can bring in a gem or two of them.
High and dry in the sense of rebound 50s and quality of kicking to generate and start the rebound run.
Mcgovern & JSoS are the only two guys that can kick out of defence and look for the corridor or take on a risky kick (yes, Mcgovern a bit dodgy). This leaves Haynes average kicking, and then bring Youngs into the side and his sideways kicks to the fore (plus his penchant for waiting 5 seconds near the mark - losing time) and Weitering dodgy outbound kicks to the fore. This means the side will return to kicking it high down the wing and be predictable as those guys aren't confident enough.
The only player linked with us so far is potentially Khamis from the doggies who cant muster a metres gained number of more than 110 metres so he is a specialist at kicking it sideways as well...so non threatening completely out of defence.
Yes, an old Neman returns (Doch situation a little bit now potentially) but he is a one-sided kick and goes down the wing a long and high out of defence.
I can only see a world of pain where the entire AFL world has pinpointed quality qtr backs as the most important player in the side and we dont have anyone of note that fits that bill and then on top of that we most likely lose Mcgovern and JSoS so are downgrading in 2026 on kicking traits out of defence.
And i'm all for losing Mcgovern for other reasons.
Just a bloody curse i tend to think. It's hilarious to think we lose JSoS.
Are we going to be worse than WCE, North, Richmond, Melbourne and Dons next year?Hard to not see us bottom 4 next season.
All of our stars had career worst years, injuries stuffed us again, we played pretty much every kid on our list, and we lost to both richmond and North - yet we will still finish either 11th or 12th with 8 or 9 wins. Not a chance we finish bottom 4 next yearHard to not see us bottom 4 next season.
We can a trade a gun or two, as long as we bring in established guns back who a re ready to go and make us instantly better, not project players or shit trucks that cant get a game at other clubs.Are we going to be worse than WCE, North, Richmond, Melbourne and Dons next year?
No chance we finish bottom 4 unless we trade all our guns.
Player I want most out of the draft in Lindsay.
Outside player, but use him as a half-back distributor and watch the game open up for us. That kick is gorgeous.
If we hold the TDK compensation and the Dean bid is post pick 10. We might have a shot at him
An argument could be made for or against.Are we going to be worse than WCE, North, Richmond, Melbourne and Dons next year?
No chance we finish bottom 4 unless we trade all our guns.
Nth and Essendon will improve drastically next season. We won't.Are we going to be worse than WCE, North, Richmond, Melbourne and Dons next year?
No chance we finish bottom 4 unless we trade all our guns.
Has anyone said that based off those 2 players?Bottom 4 because no Gov or SOS?
![]()
Wtf would Essendon improve drastically?Nth and Essendon will improve drastically next season. We won't.
Pretty simple.
Where do we finish next year then?Bottom 4 because no Gov or SOS?
![]()
Let's wait until we're done with the ins and outs firstWhere do we finish next year then?
Easily bottom 4-6
Pretty confident, IMO, that even if the in's cover the out's that we aren't making enough incremental improvement compared to the rest of the league.Let's wait until we're done with the ins and outs first