Remove this Banner Ad

List Mgmt. 2025 List Management II 📃

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Just counted everyone. By my calculations we have 2 spots at the moment.

if we remove Elijah and White we will have 4 spots available which is my expectations

Only question is then do we need one more?

The only reason we would need a 5th spot is if we're going to trade for extra 2025 picks before the draft.
I think that is unlikely, and would go against our apparent goals.
If we're going to go for extra 2025 picks we would live-trade on draft night, and if we're going to do a trade before then I would assume it will be for future pick/s.
 
The only reason we would need a 5th spot is if we're going to trade for extra 2025 picks before the draft.
I think that is unlikely, and would go against our apparent goals.
If we're going to go for extra 2025 picks we would live-trade on draft night, and if we're going to do a trade before then I would assume it will be for future pick/s.

What about DFA or SSP? My read is we will pick 3 in draft (maybe 4 if we take Gresham?) then get a mature KPD through DFA or SSP
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

I’ve already answered this multiple times. Can you really not count into the 40s, or are you trolling?
After this post I’m going to assume the latter.

We currently have 2 list spots with Binns cut.
Lij would make 3.
And we can open another Senior list spot by cutting the uncontracted Rookie White.
You must be the troll because cutting rookies doesn't free up primary list spots to be used in the ND.

Cutting white just takes the rookie list back to the maximum 6
 
What about DFA or SSP? My read is we will pick 3 in draft (maybe 4 if we take Gresham?) then get a mature KPD through DFA or SSP

It very much looks like 3 in the ND and then 1 more DFA/SSP/Rookie.
So I don't think we would need to open a 5th spot.
And I'd be pretty surprised if we take Gresham.
 
You must be the troll because cutting rookies doesn't free up primary list spots to be used in the ND.

Cutting white just takes the rookie list back to the maximum 6

But cutting White opens up a senior list spot, because it reduces our total list numbers (Senior and Cat A) by 1.
Right now we have 2 list spots. Cutting White would make 3, and they would all be Senior List spots.
If we don't cut a Rookie we have to elevate one.

Surely you can't be this dense?
 
But cutting White opens up a senior list spot, because it reduces our total list numbers (Senior and Cat A) by 1.
Right now we have 2 list spots. Cutting White would make 3, and they would all be Senior List spots.
If we don't cut a Rookie we have to elevate one.

Surely you can't be this dense?
You aren't taking into consideration the primary list. The primary list is what matters for the ND.

What is your definition of a senior list spot??
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Just counted everyone. By my calculations we have 2 spots at the moment.

if we remove Elijah and White we will have 4 spots available which is my expectations

Only question is then do we need one more?
Soap, what would you do with one more?
 
You aren't taking into consideration the primary list. The primary list is what matters for the ND.

What is your definition of a senior list spot??

It's called the Senior List, hasn't been 'Primary' for ages.

And the numbers are fluid between 36 and 38.
So because we have run with 36, and have since the numbers got cut in 2020, we can open up 2 Senior List spots (ie National Draft Picks) by cutting 2 Rookies.

We currently have 1 too many Rookies.
1 either gets elevated to the Senior List (which doesn't change our List numbers), or cut, which creates 1 more Senior List spot.
 
You aren't taking into consideration the primary list. The primary list is what matters for the ND.

What is your definition of a senior list spot??
We've been using the maximum amount of rookie listed players allowed but that isn't necessary. You don't need to have a 36 (Senior) + 6 (Rookie) split if you don't want to. Given you're allowed to have up to 38 Senior listed players on your list, it does open up a spot for the ND by delisting a Rookie listed player in our current situation.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

He could possibly have been a decent midfielder but he's not a forwards arseh*le.
The reality is that he is too small, not quick and not a good kick. That means is is never going to be an AFL standard mid. Pressure forward is the only place he has a chance to make it. Unfortunately not being a good kick makes that role tough. Had a good game against GCS and should have had 3 goals but missed 2 sitters which unfortunately gets him dropped.

Tough work managing a list now with the Covid reduction in list size despite 23 players now on the team.
 
"It’s the same with Saad, we don’t use him to his strengths then call him a liability."

He looked like a liability when he jogged to the ball on the goal line and Watson zoomed past picked it up and snapped a goal without a finger on him!
As Ted Lasso says
“I hope that all of us, or none of us are judged by the actions of our weakest moments but rather by the strength we show when or if we are given a second chance.”

That was very shit by him, he’s also done a lot more good things than poor
 
As Ted Lasso says
“I hope that all of us, or none of us are judged by the actions of our weakest moments but rather by the strength we show when or if we are given a second chance.”

That was very shit by him, he’s also done a lot more good things than poor
I don't know why we didn't go after Ted for one of our assistant coaching roles this year.
Maybe the distance is a bit much for him after his stint at AFC Richmond. He's a strong family man.
 
BluesDeluxe I wouldn't argue with Stamos on list numbers
Rain Man GIF by Filmin
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top