- Thread starter
- Moderator
- #5,203
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
AbsolutelyWe need to free up his list spot.
Ollie is only 9 months older than Binns, same birth year, same draft year.
Just counted everyone. By my calculations we have 2 spots at the moment.
if we remove Elijah and White we will have 4 spots available which is my expectations
Only question is then do we need one more?
The only reason we would need a 5th spot is if we're going to trade for extra 2025 picks before the draft.
I think that is unlikely, and would go against our apparent goals.
If we're going to go for extra 2025 picks we would live-trade on draft night, and if we're going to do a trade before then I would assume it will be for future pick/s.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Fog was only ever at best a good, honest toilet
You must be the troll because cutting rookies doesn't free up primary list spots to be used in the ND.I’ve already answered this multiple times. Can you really not count into the 40s, or are you trolling?
After this post I’m going to assume the latter.
We currently have 2 list spots with Binns cut.
Lij would make 3.
And we can open another Senior list spot by cutting the uncontracted Rookie White.
What about DFA or SSP? My read is we will pick 3 in draft (maybe 4 if we take Gresham?) then get a mature KPD through DFA or SSP
Even Stephen Wells makes mistakes.He could possibly have been a decent midfielder but he's not a forwards arseh*le.
PossiblyWonder if this is motivated by having 54 as a live pick for points?
You must be the troll because cutting rookies doesn't free up primary list spots to be used in the ND.
Cutting white just takes the rookie list back to the maximum 6
#35 Billy WilsonNo one really gets 1-year deals unless you're over 30, you have massive injury history or your career is hanging by a thread.
If you are best 30 or so and playing some senior games, you're getting a two-year extension.
Sometimes this will come back to bite you. Cost of doing business.
You aren't taking into consideration the primary list. The primary list is what matters for the ND.But cutting White opens up a senior list spot, because it reduces our total list numbers (Senior and Cat A) by 1.
Right now we have 2 list spots. Cutting White would make 3, and they would all be Senior List spots.
If we don't cut a Rookie we have to elevate one.
Surely you can't be this dense?
Soap, what would you do with one more?Just counted everyone. By my calculations we have 2 spots at the moment.
if we remove Elijah and White we will have 4 spots available which is my expectations
Only question is then do we need one more?
You aren't taking into consideration the primary list. The primary list is what matters for the ND.
What is your definition of a senior list spot??
Soap, what would you do with one more?
We've been using the maximum amount of rookie listed players allowed but that isn't necessary. You don't need to have a 36 (Senior) + 6 (Rookie) split if you don't want to. Given you're allowed to have up to 38 Senior listed players on your list, it does open up a spot for the ND by delisting a Rookie listed player in our current situation.You aren't taking into consideration the primary list. The primary list is what matters for the ND.
What is your definition of a senior list spot??
He could possibly have been a decent midfielder but he's not a forwards arseh*le.
Can't bat, bowl or throw either by all reports.Can’t kick, can’t play
The reality is that he is too small, not quick and not a good kick. That means is is never going to be an AFL standard mid. Pressure forward is the only place he has a chance to make it. Unfortunately not being a good kick makes that role tough. Had a good game against GCS and should have had 3 goals but missed 2 sitters which unfortunately gets him dropped.He could possibly have been a decent midfielder but he's not a forwards arseh*le.
Yeah but you can always rely on finding a few good nuggets in them.I hate dishonest toilets!!!
![]()
![]()
![]()
Im also certain the 4th pick would just be a rookie upgrade and allow us to take 54 into the draft.Wonder if this is motivated by having 54 as a live pick for points?
As Ted Lasso says"It’s the same with Saad, we don’t use him to his strengths then call him a liability."
He looked like a liability when he jogged to the ball on the goal line and Watson zoomed past picked it up and snapped a goal without a finger on him!
I don't know why we didn't go after Ted for one of our assistant coaching roles this year.As Ted Lasso says
“I hope that all of us, or none of us are judged by the actions of our weakest moments but rather by the strength we show when or if we are given a second chance.”
That was very shit by him, he’s also done a lot more good things than poor