serial_thrilla
PhenomenalV1's Best Friend
- Mar 25, 2014
- 44,866
- 104,836
- AFL Club
- Fremantle
- Other Teams
- Fighting Furies
- Moderator
- #13,972
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
I really didn't get Speed dating format.Freo was one of the few clubs that didn’t attend the trade 'speed date' discussions on Tuesday, so I don't mind the move to make it known publicly that our first rounder is available for a rebuilding club. It will not only get the attention of list managers, but also players that might want to come to or return to WA. Worst case is we let Walls draft another talented youngster.
Anyways, re-signing Erasmus is enough to make this trade period a win for me.
If we have cap space we front load contracts and that helps keep ou players when the new Tasmanian teams enters the league.Are we purposely keeping our salary cap open to lure someone big home in the future? I would have thought that our attitude would be 'win now'. Warner's contract ends in 27, Kozzie extended to 34, I don't think there is anyone else?
Are we purposely keeping our salary cap open to lure someone big home in the future? I would have thought that our attitude would be 'win now'. Warner's contract ends in 27, Kozzie extended to 34, I don't think there is anyone else?
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Did realise GWS were one of the other clubs that didn't attend. They were the only other club with exit meetings this week.Freo was one of the few clubs that didn’t attend the trade 'speed date' discussions on Tuesday, so I don't mind the move to make it known publicly that our first rounder is available for a rebuilding club. It will not only get the attention of list managers, but also players that might want to come to or return to WA. Worst case is we let Walls draft another talented youngster.
Anyways, re-signing Erasmus is enough to make this trade period a win for me.
There would be plenty of new things to discuss following the exit meetings of the bottom eight clubs. Players would be telling clubs they want out, and conversely clubs would be telling players to look elsewhere. Freo were still doing their exit meetings when these early trade discussions took place.Clubs would be in discussion for a few months, and any surprises come after each team is out of the finals or in trade week.
I would have thought that player agents would be talking to clubs, and there is a thing called mobile phones.There would be plenty of new things to discuss following the exit meetings of the bottom eight clubs. Players would be telling clubs they want out, and conversely clubs would be telling players to look elsewhere. Freo were still doing their exit meetings when these early trade discussions took place.
Teams still in finals attended. Think it'd be more unavailability due to exit meetings happening at a similar time then anything that has come out since seasons ended for ten clubs.There would be plenty of new things to discuss following the exit meetings of the bottom eight clubs. Players would be telling clubs they want out, and conversely clubs would be telling players to look elsewhere. Freo were still doing their exit meetings when these early trade discussions took place.
Do you ever usually get surprise trade requests out of exit meetings though? They're almost always kept on the dl and no official "trade request" comes through a lot of the time.Teams still in finals attended. Think it'd be more unavailability due to exit meetings happening at a similar time then anything that has come out since seasons ended for ten clubs.
Not sure there's been any surprise trade requests yet tbh. If there was they are no names. The media has talked about pretty much all players that have requested a trade so far.
As has been pointed out player managers will reach out to clubs and clubs will have one on one chats with other clubs separately.
He looked pretty flat in the pics they uploaded of the exit interviews this week.Freddy will feel like sh*t after last week - I trust him to do a lot of work in the off season. Having spoken to him at an even this year, he’s genuinely intelligent
Yeah I don't like what we reverted to (even though we got through).
Sharp needs to improve his kicking and defensive physicality, running and positioning is fine.
NOD needs to stay fit.
JOM will most likely come out for Johnson next season.
Worner had a good year and totally improved but I do not think he should be in our starting back 6, would be interesting if he can compete on the wing, he has the running power and is already better defensively than Sharp.
Banfield should go back to being the utility.
I actually thought Worner was picked up as a winger and subsequently converted to a HB?
I think Chappy could go to the wing also.
If we held off on the contract, until he improved his tackling then I would be a lot happier.
What motivation is there for him to work hard on the different things in his game now.
Are you happy with JOM's and Will Brodie's contracts?
I am just saying for fringe players it adds a bit too much risk, when 3 plus 1 year deals would be safer for the club.
If Freddy is a fringe player after playing basically every single game for three years I’d be surprised
In my eyes he is.
My trigger finger was itchy after the game but with Switta pushing 30 and Dudley being uncertain and Reid going midfield, unless we have a Kozzie Pickett we can get he’s not fringe
Unless they're like Geelong drafting 26 year olds, yes they are, unless you can prove otherwise.No they aren't.
Finding this whole we're getting younger debate a bit silly tbh. So far we've lost the following from our list:Unless they're like Geelong drafting 26 year olds, yes they are, unless you can prove otherwise.
I was careful not to say in between seasons given the 6 month gap.
If you have 3 18 year olds on draft day your squad is younger. Good luck disputing that mate.
Freddy's deal would have been worked out well prior to him bed shitting this weekend off the back of what was overall a really positive 2025.If we held off on the contract, until he improved his tackling then I would be a lot happier.
What motivation is there for him to work hard on the different things in his game now.
Are you happy with JOM's and Will Brodie's contracts?
I am just saying for fringe players it adds a bit too much risk, when 3 plus 1 year deals would be safer for the club.
That's exactly my point, this argument we're getting younger is as dumb as it gets. All that matters is the age of our playing 30, and that is certainly getting older next year. Exactly as you say, all the older guys leaving made almost zero contribution.Finding this whole we're getting younger debate a bit silly tbh. So far we've lost the following from our list:
- Walters - 0 games this season
- Narkle - 0 games in the starting 22 this year.
- Fyfe - 1 game in the starting 22 this year
- Aish - 1 game in the starting 22 this year
- Reidy - 1 game this year
- Brodie - 0 games in 2 and half years
- Delean - 0 games ever
- Jones - 0 games ever
As far as 2025 games go only really Fyfe has added anything. Outside of that it's two games in starting 22 combined and four as sub.
You said none of that in your original statement. Any team drafting a mature ager isn't necessarily getting younger. You made a blanket statement which wasn't true.Unless they're like Geelong drafting 26 year olds, yes they are, unless you can prove otherwise.
I was careful not to say in between seasons given the 6 month gap.
If you have 3 18 year olds on draft day your squad is younger. Good luck disputing that mate.
It's not that serious. The majority of teams draft all 18 year olds on draft so their team gets younger. Even the ones that draft a mature ager usually also take a couple younger guys to offset their impact on the age. Weird thing to nitpick over when the statement is true over 95% of the time.You said none of that in your original statement. Any team drafting a mature ager isn't necessarily getting younger. You made a blanket statement which wasn't true.