serial_thrilla
PhenomenalV1's Best Friend
- Mar 25, 2014
- 44,612
- 104,303
- AFL Club
- Fremantle
- Other Teams
- Fighting Furies
- Moderator
- #13,972
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
The only way this passes the sniff test is if WCE did actually make a far bigger $$$ offer to Judd and told Melb they'd trade them 23, Melb asked McVee to consider WC and Wallsy didn't want Judd staring at those extra $$$ for too long.Im trying to find ways for people to understand what they have supposedly done and why its important that trade is missing something.
The club appears to have given away 33 to WC for free. Like, people need to grasp that trade should not be waived away.
May as well close the forum if we can’t criticize the club for doing a poor job. The constant glazing is embarrassing.
(I don’t really care too much either way, but it’s objectively a pretty poor trade for us)
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Is it 33 after free agents or 33 prior to free agents?Im trying to find ways for people to understand what they have supposedly done and why its important that trade is missing something.
The club appears to have given away 33 to WC for free. Like, people need to grasp that trade should not be waived away.
Snuffs explained the maths multiple times if you would like to go back and check?It’s not objective at all.
Just some Dunning-Kruger going on..
I dont need to be expert to know how bad that current trade is and trying to justify it as it stands is just mind boggling to me. Let's see if anyone else gives up value to move down the order.It’s not objective at all.
Just some Dunning-Kruger going on..
You new here?
After free agents, before draft bidsIs it 33 after free agents or 33 prior to free agents?
No 50+44 > 46 is involved. Which again makes no sense??? Downgrading a pick and then giving them an extra one for nothing50>46 involved
It’s Brisbanes first round not second round and before all the charity compo picksYeah it’s West Coasts charity pick for being shit.
Not sure - details are sketchyNo 50+44 > 46 is involved. Which again makes no sense??? Downgrading a pick and then giving them an extra one for nothing
LMFAOOO (**** that guy)David Swallow coming out of retirement to play for WCE lol
Would hope so. Best to wait for official lodgement. I think he has a few details wrong or missing something.I need to go for a walk.
We didn't seriously give up 12 and 33 for McVee and 19 did we?
Whilst also changing 44 and 50 into 46!
HAHAHAHA.
HAS to be more.
Like even some token swap of futures.
It makes no sense.
Nothing wrong with having too much time on one’s hands. It’s better than the alternative where one is too busy and burnt out to be able to send a few messages on a forumPeople have way too much time on their hands if they are melting this much over draft picks. Go out side touch grass and smile who’s to say that who we draft at pick 12 isn’t going to be a dud and 19 be the next Murphy Reid. Just wait for the future and get angry like when people post the Luke hodge trade again

Always make time for a good three hour melt after a shocking trade period update.Nothing wrong with having too much time on one’s hands. It’s better than the alternative where one is too busy and burnt out to be able to send a few messages on a forum![]()
Snuffs explained the maths multiple times if you would like to go back and check?
Do you have a more objective measure than that? Because if you’re basing it on your feelings, you’ve already lost this argument.
Where is this reported?David Swallow coming out of retirement to play for WCE lol