serial_thrilla
PhenomenalV1's Best Friend
- Mar 25, 2014
- 44,612
- 104,302
- AFL Club
- Fremantle
- Other Teams
- Fighting Furies
- Moderator
- #13,972
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Played alright in that prelim , 10x better at making a contest down the line than Darcy’s pathetic efforts in our finalHe’s washed and American. Don’t waste a list spot on him
That prelim? 8 years ago?Played alright in that prelim , 10x better at making a contest down the line than Darcy’s pathetic efforts in our final
Just the sort of good enough to play back up we need
No current season stats available
Big cox Little cox and a Johnson.
wtf!!???I swear to Matthew Pavlich if anyone in our crowds starts chanting USA ill vomit on the spot.
The main issue is the 2 years, wait till the Peel watchers start bagging him in round 3. It’ll seem like an eternity at Peel which will probably be fine for our AFL team as I recon he won’t be required.For what we'd want, Mason Cox is a level above other options we were linked with like Harry Boyd and Brynn Teakle. Checks most of the boxes - big body that will absorb the hits, can be a presence down the line, won't ask for much. Watch what Grundy did to Teakle or how Boyd wasn't even St Kilda's best VFL ruckman. It's not about his abilities in a vacuum (obviously he's gotten worse), it's relative to what else is available.
In general, I like the idea of making a decision on our backup ruck early rather than SSPing them. The SSP should be used on 22 and under players that have promise but you want to learn more about. If the debate is Cox vs Teakle vs Boyd, there should be ample vision already out there to make the call.
To each their own.I prefer Collingwood's Cox, Dick, and Goldsack.
2 years is a long time for a 34 year old
He won't be getting offers elsewhere so 1 is enough if he wants to continue his career, if he doesn't want to move over for just the 1 then so be it, don't see why we should be bending on this