Watch the rise of Milera now. Maybe he can get to 4 games this year.Mills got a foot injury of some type - so that will make it more interesting for SC - as everyone have had him in their team & will now be forced to change
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Watch the rise of Milera now. Maybe he can get to 4 games this year.Mills got a foot injury of some type - so that will make it more interesting for SC - as everyone have had him in their team & will now be forced to change
played well today but need to see what his cbas are once petracca and viney are playingI haven't paid enough attention and somehow Rivers got into my team - thoughts on Rivers please
do you also have holmes or sdk? they all seem like decent options but im ending up with a lot of players with early byesRivers is on my watchlist for D4, but can't see it happening. I currently have Stewart in there and would only take Rivers if I desperately needed that extra $60k
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Yeah I got Holmes and Mills as well. So, 3 outs from defense as well as Daicos in the mids from that Rd3 bye. Pain in the arse trying to navigate these byes, but I don't want to compromise what players I want too much in spite of them, despite also having one eye on them to make sure I don't have a ridiculous amount of players missing.do you also have holmes or sdk? they all seem like decent options but im ending up with a lot of players with early byes
He's only $15K appox more expensive than Sanders ....and $40K under SmithPeatling only 21%, could be an okay miss / correction trade. Would have to go 90+ to make money and won't be a keeper. Not sure he is full locked. Thoughts maths wizards?
He's only $15K appox more expensive than Sanders ....and $40K under Smith
I'd prefer to jettison Sanders B4 Peatling ...and probably even Smith
Same thought process here .... thinking Sanders to Harcia to free up $100KSmith hard no, not in my team. Sanders is in and out at the moment, could ditch Sanders, Peatling stays and take myself another premo. decisions.
Don't think - DO!!!Same thought process here .... thinking Sanders to Harcia to free up $100K
Average when not sub = 91Peatling only 21%, could be an okay miss / correction trade. Would have to go 90+ to make money and won't be a keeper. Not sure he is full locked. Thoughts maths wizards?
I think Peatling is for those who can’t afford Soligo, Day, Washcroft, Oliver prices.Peatling only 21%, could be an okay miss / correction trade. Would have to go 90+ to make money and won't be a keeper. Not sure he is full locked. Thoughts maths wizards?
Never done such a deep dive into one guy like this.Average when not sub = 91
Average with 40%+ CBAs = 93
Average with 50%+ CBAs = 98
Average with 60%+ CBAs = 106
When he had 50%+ CBAs, he averaged 19 touches and 8 tackles
VFL season 2024 average (only 3 matches because he was in and out of the AFL side and emergency a few times) = 120 AF
5-rd-avg from the last 5 matches of VFL season 2023 = 106 AF
That'll do me...
The rest of the Crows mids are attack-focused. Peatling as the defensive-minded one, he could end up getting the most CBAs protecting the others and feeding them the ball. I have no doubt he'll have a couple of 25 touches/10 tackle games. I would not at all be surprised if he goes 105 and is a keeper.
Aside from a couple of days where I got spooked off all Crows players because of Sam Berry (LOL! I know, crazy stuff what goes through my mind sometimes), he's close to the biggest lock this year for me.
Wouldn't put any stock into SC Gold projections at all in the preseason considering all rookies are projected to score between 18-38.Had one team with Peatling at M7 and all I could afford in Rucks was Cameron and Bryan with Boyd.
Silly SC projections had that as my highest predicted scoring team so far with between 1923-1940 Points for R1.
This. Projected means absolutely nothing, especially at the start of the season. If I score my projected ~1800 I'll delete my team and you won't see me again until next year.Wouldn't put any stock into SC Gold projections at all in the preseason considering all rookies are projected to score between 18-38.
tbf if we get another Chesser these projection are at the high end....Wouldn't put any stock into SC Gold projections at all in the preseason considering all rookies are projected to score between 18-38.
This. Projected means absolutely nothing, especially at the start of the season. If I score my projected ~1800 I'll delete my team and you won't see me again until next year.
As Steve showed, Peatling is an easy pick IF he gets decent CBA's (50%+)Never done such a deep dive into one guy like this.
Well done on getting this data.
Saw some similar stats from Harcia in the VFL when he wasn’t a sub for Ross the Boss.
There is a whole list of VFL players at rookie prices putting up similar numbers.
Made a rough list in a post a fortnight or so ago.
I did like seeing Peatling sneak a few goals in the practice game which gave him an uptick in my ratings.
But he has fallen in and out of my side as I try to square off the Defenders as that feels like it could be the feast or famine line. Taking almost as much money as the midfield line to get going.
Had one team with Peatling at M7 and all I could afford in Rucks was Cameron and Bryan with Boyd.
Silly SC projections had that as my highest predicted scoring team so far with between 1923-1940 Points for R1.
Then I chop it up start again with Gawn and Xerri and can’t get above 1800.
Go figure.
To illustrate my point dabombers, here's the worst team I could possibly come up with in order to maximise projected scores. That projected is probably 400-600 points higher than everybody's teams on here, yet it would be absolutely horrendous in practice:Wouldn't put any stock into SC Gold projections at all in the preseason considering all rookies are projected to score between 18-38.
JuddgementDay is your guy I think!Also, somebody make that team please![]()
Hey - I’ve said I want to be competitive - just not that competitive!JuddgementDay is your guy I think!
Not my first BBQ Scythe94Wouldn't put any stock into SC Gold projections at all in the preseason considering all rookies are projected to score between 18-38.
This. Projected means absolutely nothing, especially at the start of the season. If I score my projected ~1800 I'll delete my team and you won't see me again until next year.