- Moderator
- #1
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Some of us made a Jr league team in that position - SA league admittedly - and very Jr.I agree though that weird half forward is a poison position

Basically phillipou vs Carmichael
Just quietly has Greeves gone?
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Sounds very similar to Kyle imo.Similar to Edwards just horribly overrated on production.
What he does have is massive upside but it’s an IF he puts it together
They kinda took all upside physical players… on that thematic not surprising we didn’t take himI can’t help but wonder if we’d have taken Carmichael if we knew King was going to be ignored.
Hindsight is a wonderful thing - I’d love to know how the recruitment team really feels now.
Basically phillipou vs Carmichael

Fox Footy, there’s your answerTwo years in a row that Fox have not shown a single player selected by Sydney when that player was actually picked.
Disgraceful, unless it's a club directive.
Nope.
Defensive side and athleticism must have been a big knock
Sounds very similar to Kyle imo.
I can’t help but wonder if we’d have taken Carmichael if we knew King was going to be ignored.
Hindsight is a wonderful thing - I’d love to know how the recruitment team really feels now.
The two are likely not independent. As I’ve already commented in this thread, other clubs may hqve lost interest in bidding on King knowing we’d match the bid and with “making us pay the price” or eliminating our later picks not really being relevant. Especially after pick 35 came and went.I can’t help but wonder if we’d have taken Carmichael if we knew King was going to be ignored.
Hindsight is a wonderful thing - I’d love to know how the recruitment team really feels now.
Goodes was 45?The two are likely not independent. As I’ve already commented in this thread, other clubs may hqve lost interest in bidding on King knowing we’d match the bid and with “making us pay the price” or eliminating our later picks not really being relevant. Especially after pick 35 came and went.
People should also remember O’Keefe was a pick 50 something. Malceski and Schneider pick 60s. Good players do emerge from the lower reaches of the draft. Sometimes. (And that’s ignoring the rookie draft.)
How was king rated in the top 5 at one stage lol
43 I think. Though the limit on 17 yos might have contributed to that.Goodes was 45?
Sure but I mean surely here why not take him in the rookie draft
And I think this will eventually help. He has the attributes to be a really special player. Lots of work to do of course, however I have confidence he will get there.He has runs on the board in previous years and is an athletic unicorn.
Previous years he has shown a tonne as a midfielder, but Sydney wanted him to develop as a forward as well this year (then form and illness affected his ranking).
If he's actually a Chad/Heeney clone I'll be ecstaticWell those who wanted midfielders got your wish. One inside mature body and a Chad/Heeney clone.
Kyle likely to end up in the midfield or at worst a dynamic HBF.
Hopefully we haven't forgotten Max King.
Assume we take Lloyd and Rampe as Cat A and Chamberlain and McNamara as Cat B. Tall winger/HF and a probable utility.
I believe we have used up possible slots. He couldn't be a Cat B for us IIRC.At this rate Greeves will be available as a rookie.