- Thread starter
- #6,301
That’s a holiday. He’s learnt that from Pickett
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

BigFooty AFLW Notice Img
AFLW 2025 - AFLW Trade and Draft - All the player moves
Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
He’s trying to concentrate and it’s burning up his limited RAM quickly.why does May always look like he’s sucking on a sour warhead
They've turned that ground into a fortress - for their opponents.Have the dees ever won in Alice, I can’t remember them having so, their supporters must love them selling this game.
They sort of haven't grasped the concept of home ground advanatgeThey've turned that ground into a fortress - for their opponents.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
That’s a holiday. He’s learnt that from Pickett
Ive given up trying to predict themMy gues for Pickett is:
A) Nothing to see
B) Small fine
The fact that Fox Footy are conveniently ignoring it means little attention from higher up
Nas is back on the ground, but I don't think that should matter.That’s a holiday. He’s learnt that from Pickett
He has so much fine as a sniper and as we keep hearing Maynard is a thug.My gues for Pickett is:
A) Nothing to see
B) Small fine
The fact that Fox Footy are conveniently ignoring it means little attention from higher up
But if hes knocked out in the same action he misses weeks. Literally 2 identical incidents can have different penalty's. Great systemBecause NWM came back on comms are speculating that he might now get a fine rather than a ban. No mention at all of any Pickett incident.
The guidelines have the capacity for Christian to grade impact on potential rather than actual impact, but he never seems to use it - he should.Nas is back on the ground, but I don't think that should matter.
This is the type of action they apparently want out of the game & suspension shouldn't purely be based on the outcome, which can just be bad luck.
It’s comicalBut if hes knocked out in the same action he misses weeks. Literally 2 identical incidents can have different penalty's. Great system
Especially this weekThe guidelines have the capacity for Christian to grade impact on potential rather than actual impact, but he never seems to use it - he should.
And if you happen to bump a player who has a history of concussions, it doesn't even need to be a big hit.But if hes knocked out in the same action he misses weeks. Literally 2 identical incidents can have different penalty's. Great system
Just play his song
It should be judged on the action clearly so expect no change on thisAnd if you happen to bump a player who has a history of concussions, it doesn't even need to be a big hit.
That’s a textbook suspension. Chose to bump, left the ground, contact to the head.Because NWM came back on comms are speculating that he might now get a fine rather than a ban. No mention at all of any Pickett incident.
Yeah they never seem to use the potential clause. Even completely excused Logan Morris for forcing Howe to smash his knee into Moore which ended up in vertigo symptoms. There was not even potential then, there was a consequence. I am wondering if Christian sometimes overcompensates by being fairer to others and harsher on us to avoid bias allegations.Especially this week
That’s a textbook suspension. Chose to bump, left the ground, contact to the head.
2 down to 1 probably.
Worked a treat for HawthornI hope for no suspensions or injuries for Melbourne. I want them to win against St Kilda and be full of confidence.
I hope for no suspensions or injuries for Melbourne. I want them to win against St Kilda and be full of confidence.
Are you pre-empting CODI hope for no suspensions or injuries for Melbourne. I want them to win against St Kilda and be full of confidence.