Welsh delisted with assurance to be re-rookies.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
I wonder if the whole work rate knock on Welsh is a bit overblown and he's just not good enough.
Kicked bags in junior footy monstering kids, doesn't have the size to do that at the next level or the versatility/tricks to be anything other than a lead, mark, kick dinosaur style full forward. Has some explosive speed but doesn't really have the craft to use it. Would kick a million goals in country footy.
He came back from a medium term injury this year looking in physically really good nick and still couldn't get a kick.
I feel a bit sorry for him when I read some of the comments on here because I'm just not sure I see an AFL standard talent there.
Welsh delisted with assurance to be re-rookies.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
It is what it is but i still think both cook and sholl have had more than enough time to prove themselves welsh is only 19 this maybe the push he needs we shall see but those 2 others must be on thin iceWhoops
Reasoning is likely the club see Sholl and Cook as being more likely to produce at AFL level if called upon than Welsh.It is what it is but i still think both cook and sholl have had more than enough time to prove themselves welsh is only 19 this maybe the push he needs we shall see but those 2 others must be on thin ice
For all his faults, Sholl is a capable AFL player.It is what it is but i still think both cook and sholl have had more than enough time to prove themselves welsh is only 19 this maybe the push he needs we shall see but those 2 others must be on thin ice
Likely we'll find out today if Mitch Stevens is in our thinking too?
Capable yes but will only be a break glass incase of emergencyFor all his faults, Sholl is a capable AFL player.
He just doesn't fit our contest heavy, grinding style. Should have been traded to a club that could use a purely outside player.
Wondering whether this indicates we will trade up with our future picks ?
Sharp/Cumming/Schubert
Cody Curtin
Stevens
Interesting... I was going to suggest that we may choose to nominate him for the RD only (with the nomination date for that being later), then I realised that we won't have any rookie list positions available.Cal Twomey posted a list of F/S nominations to Twitter yesterday and Mitch Stevens wasn't among the list. Of course we could come in with the paperwork at the last minute
Smart call on Welsh - he’s a little way off AFL selection, takes key forwards more time
Wonder if this means we are confident in getting pick 9 or have we targeted a DFA?
Those in the club will tell you that he still has a problem with his attitude/approach to the game. That doesn’t meant you are wrong. He might not be good enough regardless.I wonder if the whole work rate knock on Welsh is a bit overblown and he's just not good enough.
Kicked bags in junior footy monstering kids, doesn't have the size to do that at the next level or the versatility/tricks to be anything other than a lead, mark, kick dinosaur style full forward. Has some explosive speed but doesn't really have the craft to use it. Would kick a million goals in country footy.
He came back from a medium term injury this year looking in physically really good nick and still couldn't get a kick.
I feel a bit sorry for him when I read some of the comments on here because I'm just not sure I see an AFL standard talent there.
Said it before, if he doesn't come back to training looking like prime McLeod then he's a fool and his career will be a short one.This would indicate the opposite, in that we don't want to give Welsh that time and have him firmly in the gun to delist at the end of next year.
The kid has got to get his shit together and fast.
A little way off AFL?Smart call on Welsh - he’s a little way off AFL selection, takes key forwards more time
Wonder if this means we are confident in getting pick 9 or have we targeted a DFA?
I wonder if the whole work rate knock on Welsh is a bit overblown and he's just not good enough.
Kicked bags in junior footy monstering kids, doesn't have the size to do that at the next level or the versatility/tricks to be anything other than a lead, mark, kick dinosaur style full forward. Has some explosive speed but doesn't really have the craft to use it. Would kick a million goals in country footy.
He came back from a medium term injury this year looking in physically really good nick and still couldn't get a kick.
I feel a bit sorry for him when I read some of the comments on here because I'm just not sure I see an AFL standard talent there.
Interesting... I was going to suggest that we may choose to nominate him for the RD only (with the nomination date for that being later), then I realised that we won't have any rookie list positions available.
Given that the AFC have delisted Welsh, with the stated intention of re-drafting him in the RD, as far as Stevens is concerned it's ND or bust. Presumably, they don't rate him highly enough to take him with one of our ND selections.
As for "coming in with the paperwork at the last minute"... The AFL's 2025 Telstra AFL Draft Booklet (attached) states that F/S and Academy Bidding Nominations have to be lodged by today. This is for the ND. Clubs have until Friday 21st November to pre-select F/S players ahead of the RD. As noted above, we won't have a rookie list vacancy, so will be unable to pre-list him ahead of the RD.
So... the deadline for nominating Stevens under the F/S rule is today. However, I don't know what time nominations close today (4pm would be my guess - but it's only a guess).
Possible, but highly unlikely. Our remaining rookies are Turray, Borlase and McAndrew. I don't see any reason to think we'd be upgrading any of them. None are getting close to timing out on the rookie list, or demanding to be upgraded by becoming regular members of our best 22. The only reason to upgrade any of them is list shenanigans, and there doesn't seem to be any need for that either.It's possible we will elevate a rookie to the main list to free up a rookie spot, instead of using a pick at the national draft
It's possible we will elevate a rookie to the main list to free up a rookie spot, instead of using a pick at the national draft
I'm not sure what date Rookie Upgrades had/have to be done by. The AFL Draft Booklet lists a number of critical dates, but rooke upgrades is not one of them.It's possible we will elevate a rookie to the main list to free up a rookie spot, instead of using a pick at the national draft
Surely we would have announced Stevens at the same time as Welsh if we were going to nominate him