Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Yet we smashed you funny thatYeah coz that clearly works.
AFL sticking to their method, a soft lead in to finals = less match hardened. Can’t have cats winning can we?
Chris Fagan acknowledged this advantage for the lions in 2024.
Maybe we should sook as hard as Brisbane did so we get a better fixture.
All we’ve heard from Brisbane is Wah Wah Wah we got the hardest draw ever, meanwhile you can’t beat North.
Why would the lions want easy teams?
You can't change 10 Vic teams being entitled to their 50% share of matches at home and as such being in Victoria.Change???
Appreciate that one. I was hoping for the programme-esque 7-8 page document that breaks down the draw etc.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Whether we win, lose or draw people watch. Just the reality of the situationCarlton with 7 prime time games is bat shit crazy
Everything is possible, just have to find solutions and in 20 years we won't even remember how it was.You can't change 10 Vic teams being entitled to their 50% share of matches at home and as such being in Victoria.
Crows will get ~75k if it’s a nice nightSo after all the Lions supporters whinging about the change to the weighting it's actually Collingwood (predictably) and Geelong (less so) that are the ones who cop 4 top 6 teams twice.
Also, for those who love to say Collingwood get a great financial draw - here's our full list of home games for the entire first half of the season when crowds and interest are at their peak:
Adelaide
GWS (Docklands)
Hawthorn
West Coast
Hands up if your team wants that draw.
10 teams from Victoria. Each with 11 home fixtures.Everything is possible, just have to find solutions and in 20 years we won't even remember how it was.
embarassingClubs join the rebranded VFL competition with Melbourne centred cluster of teams then whinge when that dictates fixtures are in Victoria. You joined our comp.. What do you expect.
Always good to have a good laugh at the end of a tough weekReckon the AFL and the broadcaster will regret pretty quickly Carltons regular prime time fixturing
Factually correct and an inconvenient truth that cannot be avoided.embarassing
10 teams from Victoria. Each with 11 home fixtures.
That's 110 matches. Hawthorn sell 4 to Tasmania. Melbourne 1 to Alice Springs and NM 2 to WA venues.
That leaves 103 fixtures in Victoria.
If we conservatively assume no non-vic teams double up against each other. I.e. All double up games are vs Vic teams there is 88 fixtures outside Victoria, not realistic but we are illustrating best case scenario here.
Once you eliminate those 8 clubs all playing each other once each that leaves 60 fixtures (88-28). So at most you could make 10 vic sides average 6 away trips interstate (60/10).
2026 (not including sold games and gather round) there are 51 away fixtures for Vic teams interstate so you're arguing over essentially 9 games through out a whole season, of which those 9 games would be lost to QLD, NSW, SA and WA city derby games and double ups from ladder position. I.e Adelaide v Freo, Lions v Swans.
So even in your not so feasible best case scenario there's little wiggle room to change the simple mathematics of how many games must be played in various venues.
Its a completely different competition, stay delusionalFactually correct and an inconvenient truth that cannot be avoided.
Hands up for getting 6 of your 11 away games at the MCGSo after all the Lions supporters whinging about the change to the weighting it's actually Collingwood (predictably) and Geelong (less so) that are the ones who cop 4 top 6 teams twice.
Also, for those who love to say Collingwood get a great financial draw - here's our full list of home games for the entire first half of the season when crowds and interest are at their peak:
Adelaide
GWS (Docklands)
Hawthorn
West Coast
Hands up if your team wants that draw.
So after all the Lions supporters whinging about the change to the weighting it's actually Collingwood (predictably) and Geelong (less so) that are the ones who cop 4 top 6 teams twice.
Also, for those who love to say Collingwood get a great financial draw - here's our full list of home games for the entire first half of the season when crowds and interest are at their peak:
Adelaide
GWS (Docklands)
Hawthorn
West Coast
Hands up if your team wants that draw.
The WA whingers don't think Melbourne teams or their fans are entitled to 11 home games.10 teams from Victoria. Each with 11 home fixtures.
That's 110 matches. Hawthorn sell 4 to Tasmania. Melbourne 1 to Alice Springs and NM 2 to WA venues.
That leaves 103 fixtures in Victoria.
If we conservatively assume no non-vic teams double up against each other. I.e. All double up games are vs Vic teams there is 88 fixtures outside Victoria, not realistic but we are illustrating best case scenario here.
Once you eliminate those 8 clubs all playing each other once each that leaves 60 fixtures (88-28). So at most you could make 10 vic sides average 6 away trips interstate (60/10).
2026 (not including sold games and gather round) there are 51 away fixtures for Vic teams interstate so you're arguing over essentially 9 games through out a whole season, of which those 9 games would be lost to QLD, NSW, SA and WA city derby games and double ups from ladder position. I.e Adelaide v Freo, Lions v Swans.
So even in your not so feasible best case scenario there's little wiggle room to change the simple mathematics of how many games must be played in various venues.
Hands up for getting 6 of your 11 away games at the MCG
Hands up for getting 6 of your 11 away games at the MCG
MCG total games (split home and away)
Collingwood 14 (8/6)
It actually isn't.Its a completely different competition, stay delusional
Sorry, it’s 9/5 so the same number of away games as the Hawks. Re Collingwood’s fixture whilst you’re only high drawing home game is the Hawks last year you had Carlton, Essendon, Geelong and Hawthorn in the first half.You’re both wrong.
75% of the Australian population live outside little Victoria, its irrelevant what was before, its a completely different competition now, there will eventually be more teams outside of Victoria than in it, so im not sure how you could even consider it anything like the VFL and its irrelevant how it all came about irrespective of who joined what competitionIt actually isn't.
It may now be called the Australian Football League but that was a name change in 1990.
The inconvenient truth is that two Melbourne clubs in some form moved interstate with a further 6 joining a Melbourne centric competition in the coming years. None were forced to join, they chose to. Don't now get all upset that the comp you joined doesn't fully suit you.
How can clubs be shocked when the focal point of the league is the city with which the competition was formed and you joined. There will always be more games in Victoria due to team density and complaining about it doesn't make it vicbias or something that anyone should even give a 2nd thought to.