Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Can't wait for the photo montage Mr Rip.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Can confirm the rumour! We had dinner in Hawthorn the other night for my birthday. Drove around Balmoral and Bulimba before heading home. Saw a couple of houses down.word around the trailer park is that the houses are officially being TRAINED DOWN
Wonder if Annable would be game to take Starcevich's role. Seems to have the size, strength, added running power. Not sure if he'll adapt to playing defense.
C'mon what.. have to start somewhere. Why not in defenseC'mon

Wonder if Annable would be game to take Starcevich's role. Seems to have the size, strength, added running power. Not sure if he'll adapt to playing defense.
C'mon what.. have to start somewhere. Why not in defense![]()
No one’s mentioned Fort!Well I think we've ticked off every single player on the list now as a Starce replacement that we don't need so hopefully thats the end of it
No one’s mentioned Fort!
As he said we have to fit Annable in somewhere. Fages often picks best available to fill a position. On the other hand Annable may be seen as the AhChee replacement.
Maybe takes some of the midfield time Zac had late in the season. And/or Neale even.Not his replacement but he'll take his spot
Well I think we've ticked off every single player on the list now as a Starce replacement that we don't need so hopefully thats the end of it
Maybe takes some of the midfield time Zac had late in the season. And/or Neale even.
I'm more interested to see what we do to replace Starcevich. Very difficult role to replace given Starce's versatility. In a similar vein it wouldn't surprise me to fill the role across multiple personnel, Moneyball style.
Big summer coming up for Kiddy Coleman. Make or break. Had the difficult 2025 I suspected he'd have but no excuses come opening round 2026. Get the body right, get fit, be in the team. Then we get to solve the problem of who plays the lockdown role(s). With Zorko, Coleman, Wilmot and Fletcher all coming off half back and the latter two in particular having shown an ability to adapt their role to what the team needs, I think we can do it by committee.
I think that will be Plan A before we look to the likes of Doedee and Brain. Fages has shown a preference for picking the best 23 players wherever possible and finding a role for them, rather than the reverse.
First round players have provided great returns for us lately when they're able to find a spot and blend into our system early. Considering Annable comes with big wraps and has excelled in every challenge in the junior level - it's worth considering him for that spot in defense.
He could play in either of Ah Chee or Starcevich spots - but I feel Starce role is more important and will give Annable a bigger challenge.
I think stepping up to AFL level is a big enough challenge in and of itself without also asking him to play a role he’s never played before!First round players have provided great returns for us lately when they're able to find a spot and blend into our system early. Considering Annable comes with big wraps and has excelled in every challenge in the junior level - it's worth considering him for that spot in defense.
He could play in either of Ah Chee or Starcevich spots - but I feel Starce role is more important and will give Annable a bigger challenge.
Do you feel we're in a position where we should give someone a big challenge instead of letting players play their best role?
We gave a challenge to Levi Ashcroft to learn playing wing last year rather than keep playing his best role (inside mid) in reserves. I'm just using the logic that's worked for us recently and applying the same to Annable.
It's a fair question. I guess the thought I was trying to convey is that Gardiner would probably do fine on a Dangerfield, Cripps, Bontempelli type. However I think asking him to play on a Rankine, Papley or Stengle type would be heart in mouth areas. Obviously we could trust him to give 110% but the question mark would be on his agility when the ball hits the ground.Wouldn’t we just play Gardiner in the Starce role? Especially with Payne coming back
It's a fair question. I guess the thought I was trying to convey is that Gardiner would probably do fine on a Dangerfield, Cripps, Bontempelli type. However I think asking him to play on a Rankine, Papley or Stengle type would be heart in mouth areas. Obviously we could trust him to give 110% but the question mark would be on his agility when the ball hits the ground.
That's why I feel like we might try to fill the Starce position by committee, with guys like Gardiner, Lester, Fletcher and Wilmot all given jobs Starce would have got in 2024 and 2025, depending on the nature of the opponent.