Position 2026 Rucks

[THE_GUN]

I can’t do anything for your trust issues, just not qualified.

I expect 4-6 trades on rucks going by the last 2 seasons due to either injuries or poor performances meaning reducing losses in Premo rucks over $100K if you start with the wrong ones.

I have budgeted 10 injury/correction trades from the team I have built.

If Rucks fall to averages between 100-100 as I expect than a 90 averaging ruck at $250K is such a bonus over a 110 average costing $600K or above.

It means all that extra $$$ can be spent on the midfield and defenders where I see some of them being the top averaging players going close to the 130pts per game mark.

This year has the biggest changes to both the rules in AFL games and that then trickles down to SuperCoach or other Fantasy games.

TDK & English are the 2 Ruckman that the new rules should suit the most and they are reasonably priced for what they could deliver and they did last round.

TDK breakeven of 97 and English 111 which is not impossible and wont lose value

 

[Double the Fist]

TDKs ruck share was awful. He needs Roma out basically.

I have x and jacko.
Hate both.
Any alternative has a bye.
If I go rooks only i spend on primos ONLY who have ****ing byes..
Tdk loses less of all potentially. Has a ****ing bye..

 

[Dewyyyyy]

Was happy running with two guns, then McAndrew at R3, because I vowed to never put a ruck into flex again after my Briggs experiment failed massively last year.

I also have zero trust in a $119k rookie at R2, despite everybody's speculations about the hit on premium ruck scoring.

The small emergence of Zane Zakostelsky has opened a new possibility however.

With his def/ruck status, I can safely put McAndrew in flex, knowing that IF he gets dropped or injured before a price rise, the swing of ZZ via flex to Sam Grlj in defence essentially opens up all lines again.

And for clarity, I'm running Grundy and English.

Very similar here