Scodog10
Brownlow Medallist
- Joined
- Jul 25, 2008
- Posts
- 27,839
- Reaction score
- 49,908
- Location
- The Linc
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
- Other Teams
- Oakland Raiders
Let’s get away from generalised statements and focus on what part of my post was harsh. Was it the observation that he’s had 5 good quarters? Was it that he’s a PCL injury induced rule change from being in trouble? Was it my assessment of how those matchups are likely to play out?Very harsh on Steene. The kid is 22 with plenty of scope for improvement.
I am more glass half full. He has been given limited opportunities and taken them. Meek/Reeves are 27 and 28 whilst Grundy is 32. So if those ruckman are.not beating Steene now then they never will.
I agree with the last sentence because I think it would be a fantastic sign for him if he can hold his own against rucks that should and likely will dominate him. The flip side of course that you didn’t acknowledge was my point that equally he should be dominating those Pittonet/ Briggs type matchups given his one wood is up there with Jackson as the most dominant one wood in the league (against certain types).
As a supporter base there is a feverish desire to see some green shoots from our U23 cohort and in Steene we’re not only seeing those green shoots, but alongside it one of the potentially most dominant traits in the league. The reality is though that we are several stratospheres from declaring him the type of untouchable talent that lead to this discussion. For context on why I’m exercising restraint go back and read the post match review of Rd 24 2024.



