The fact is Scarlett, Ling, Milburn and a host of others are getting old and slow..
We beat you with 21 players all night, kicking 23 points, hitting the post 6 times, we played bad, minus 1 player and still won..
We are a young side on the up, Geelong is an old side on the down... You might snatch another 1 this year if we let you, but you wont even get near it next year![]()
Yes stats can be interesting. I don't think its as easy to draw such conclusions. A lot of the shots Collingwood missed were low percentage. Blazing away doesn't mean that you were going to win by 10 goals. At times, you also looked utterly screwed when Geelong kicked into gear.
Your forward line was also terribly inefficient (not only in kicking for goal but general play) and didn't look very clean in comparison to Geelong's forward line. Would be interesting to see how your forwards go if Geelong's midfield clicks into gear and their supply increases and yours decreases.
The most interesting stat for the night though is that Geelong actually created more goals from general play. Collingwood only kicked two goals that weren't from Geelong errors where as Geelong kicked eight. So realistically, if Geelong can handle the ball a bit cleaner, Collingwood could have been in serious trouble as the number of errors would decrease.
Both these things are Geelong putting a bit more pressure on in their midfield and their numerous A-graders playing at even 70% through the middle and it could have been a very different story. I think in a finals series Geelong would definitely improve. I don't think Collingwood should be getting too cocky as there were some good signs from Geelong in certain areas.





