Past #22: Todd Goldstein - has advised NMFC he will seek opportunity at Essendon in '24 - 316 NM games/156 goals/'15 SBM/'15 AA/most hitouts in lge history

Remove this Banner Ad

Mate, that's also bias. It doesn't mean the same as agenda. Look it up.

Sent from my LG-H990 using Tapatalk
 
ozzyoslo said:
hahaha there's none of that here in BF is there?
Click to expand...
Plenty. But I didn't say you had an agenda, as you alleged.

Sent from my LG-H990 using Tapatalk
 

Log in to remove this ad.

ozzyoslo said:
But others have and you stated I'm anti Goldstein.........
Click to expand...
Whatever. You accused me of saying you had an agenda. I didn't. I don't give a s**t about what others said.

Sent from my LG-H990 using Tapatalk
 
the big lebowski said:
A ballsy move would be to trade Goldy for a mid first round pick this year.

I know that's an unpopular theory around here but he won't be around for our next window, we have a 10 year ruckman ready to be the number 1 man now.

Needs to be investigated
Click to expand...

It's actually a popular theory around here.

We need to see how the rest of the season plays out, but there will need to be a hard decision made one way or another.
 
TennisPlayerAndy said:
The 'no third man' rule has made gun ruckman worth a lot of money.
Click to expand...
Has also created a massive issue of clubs not nominating a ruckman and using an extra mid.
 
I think the nominate rule is bullshit anyway. Surely the rule should be that anyone can be in the ruck and they penalise a club if two of their players go up. This gives full effect to the no third man up rule, and it would very soon iterate back to two ruckmen contesting, as has happened throughout history.
 
LuvtheKangas said:
I think the nominate rule is bullshit anyway. Surely the rule should be that anyone can be in the ruck and they penalise a club if two of their players go up. This gives full effect to the no third man up rule, and it would very soon iterate back to two ruckmen contesting, as has happened throughout history.
Click to expand...

Yeah the "nominate" bit is just stupid. If you are a mid and your direct opponent nominates you're sposed to let them go and not put on any contact? What a stupid idea. Stupid.
 
the big lebowski said:
A ballsy move would be to trade Goldy for a mid first round pick this year.

I know that's an unpopular theory around here but he won't be around for our next window, we have a 10 year ruckman ready to be the number 1 man now.

Needs to be investigated
Click to expand...
Reckon I suggested that last trade period...and wouldn't be surprised to see him in orange next year.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

The Dingrel said:
Reckon I suggested that last trade period...and wouldn't be surprised to see him in orange next year.
Click to expand...


I doubt he will venture interstate due to his personal life issues. We enquired about a player last season and the other club said yes but wanted Goldy and we let out a nervous fart and left.

If Scott is at North next season so will Goldy
 
Goldy will play this week. Preuss needs to be rotated. Team selection will need to be mindful of not having too many talks against the Dogs. I think it was a good selection to go tall in Tassie as the weather conditions were not conducive to good ball movement. Under the roof at etihad, it's a different story . No need for 50 m kicks/bombs from half back or from centre into the F50.

Sent from my EVA-L09 using Tapatalk
 
LuvtheKangas said:
Mate, that's also bias. It doesn't mean the same as agenda. Look it up.
Click to expand...
So, your agenda is to highlight ozzyoslo's bias, and he thinks your bias in looking for his bias amounts to you thinking he has an agenda? #amiright?

(Not sure how that reads in Norwegian...)
 
naturally north said:
I doubt he will venture interstate due to his personal life issues. We enquired about a player last season and the other club said yes but wanted Goldy and we let out a nervous fart and left.

If Scott is at North next season so will Goldy
Click to expand...
Are you able to give details?
 
On the biggest money at north and now the second ruckman think Brad is saying nows the time to show something. And yesterday we got zero.
 
Kimbo said:
So, your agenda is to highlight ozzyoslo's bias, and he thinks your bias in looking for his bias amounts to you thinking he has an agenda? #amiright?

(Not sure how that reads in Norwegian...)
Click to expand...

Sounds about right. Or if you prefer:

Høres omtrent riktig.

Ozzy can let us know how Google Translate did on this occasion
 
Roo Beauty said:
Are you able to give details?
Click to expand...


mate the conversation was about missing out on players swapping clubs and was mentioned that clubs always ask for Goldy and we go quiet. We offer up scraps and expect quality in return. Along those lines anyway. Risk adverse was the term used.
 
* averse
 
Thought the Goldie/Preuss combo was actually working ok while we were competitive in the middle.

Think its every chance to be successful this year against lesser opposition. Probably not great news for Daw though.
 
Happy Hour said:
Thought the Goldie/Preuss combo was actually working ok while we were competitive in the middle.

Think its every chance to be successful this year against lesser opposition. Probably not great news for Daw though.
Click to expand...

Yeah, it did. 3 goals between both of them yesterday and 4 goals in the first round and both got enough of the ball.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

giantroo
Past #15: Daniel Howe - #31 in '14 ND to HFC - delisted end '22 - #33 in '23 RD to NM -retires from AFL & NM end '23 - 107 AFL games / 11 NM games
12 13 14 15 16
Replies
399
Views
28K
r00boy96
r00boy96

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top