23 & Under Side

[HBK619]

Just to help settle a debate which of these two teams has the best 23 & Under side.

Richmond:

B: Alex Rance Will Thursfield Andrew Raines
HB: Daniel Connors Graham Polak Jake King
C: Dean Polo Brett Deledio Richard Tambling
HF: Shane Edwards Cleve Hughes Mitch Morton
F: Adam Pattison Jack Riewoldt Danny Meyer
R: Angus Graham Nathan Foley Trent Cotchin

I/C: Jay Schulz Travis Casserly Luke McGuane Daniel Jackson

Carlton

B: Joe Anderson Michael Jamison Paul Bower
HB: Dennis Armfield Mark Austin Andrew Walker
C: Kade Simpson Adam Bentick Shaun Grigg
HF: Brad Fisher Matthew Kreuzer Jordan Russell
F: Eddie Betts Adam Hartlett Jake Edwards
R: Shaun Hampson Bryce Gibbs Marc Murphy

I/C: Luke Blackwell Ryan Jackson Steven Browne Aisake O'hAilpin

Note:The bold doesn't mean anything it is just to help define the players.

 

[one_twelve112]

Carlton easily....it would be a lot closer if you didn't include Tambling though.

 

[LuKe2428]

Carlton easily....it would be a lot closer if you didn't include Tambling though.

ur joking arnt u mate half of ur players dnt even get a kick deledio>murphy
foley>>gibbs just wait man ull see who has the better team in 3-4 years

 

[jonesy86]

position by position I'd have

B: Rance Thursfield Raines
HB: Connors Polak Walker
C: Simpson Deledio Tambling
HF: Fisher Kreuzer Morton
F: Betts Reiwoldt Meyer
Foll: Hampson Foley Murphy
INT: Schulz Jackson McGuane Jackson

a 14-8 split to Richmond

the line-ball decisions were Hampson/Graham and Meyer/Edwards

 

[C4[2]Yo`DooR]

position by position I'd have

B: Rance Thursfield Raines
HB: Connors Polak Walker
C: Simpson Deledio Tambling
HF: Fisher Kreuzer Morton
F: Betts Reiwoldt Meyer
Foll: Hampson Foley Murphy
INT: Schulz Jackson McGuane Jackson

a 14-8 split to Richmond

the line-ball decisions were Hampson/Graham and Meyer/Edwards

you'd have Danny Meyer in the forward pocket ... yet Bryce Gibbs doesn't rate a mention.

it should be made to include 24 year olds, so we can include: Judd, Waite, Thornton etc.

 

[Flashhh]

B: Alex Rance Will Thursfield Andrew Raines
HB: Daniel Connors Graham Polak Andrew Walker
C: Kade Simpson Brett Deledio Shaun Grigg
HF: Brad Fisher Matthew Kreuzer Mitch Morton
F: Eddie Betts Jack Riewoldt Danny Meyer
R: Shaun Hampson Nathan Foley Marc Murphy

I/C: Jay Schulz Ryan Jackson Aisake O'hAilpin Daniel Jackson

Richmond - 12
Carlton - 10

but thenb again Richmond are Richmond so while they may have some alright players they are still a joke.

 

[smiddaz123]

but thenb again Richmond are Richmond so while they may have some alright players they are still a joke.

but so are carlton.

 

[jonesy86]

you'd have Danny Meyer in the forward pocket ... yet Bryce Gibbs doesn't rate a mention.

it should be made to include 24 year olds, so we can include: Judd, Waite, Thornton etc.

of course you wouldn't have Meyer over Gibbs...but as i said in my post, i was comparing position to position of the teams that were listed

 

[Monkeyboy]

Agree that having Tambling in the side pushes my vote to Carlton.

 

[magpie_militia]

Agree that having Tambling in the side pushes my vote to Carlton.

Ha ha, fancy you being pro Carlton Monkeyboy!!

Who would have guessed!

 

[MinerBoy]

Before actually reading the sides I would have said Carlton without thinking. They may still be in front after looking them over although I would say without the benefit of the last 3 No.1 picks, the balance of Richmond's squad listed is perhaps better. (Perhaps).

 

[one_twelve112]

Before actually reading the sides I would have said Carlton without thinking. They may still be in front after looking them over although I would say without the benefit of the last 3 No.1 picks, the balance of Richmond's squad listed is perhaps better. (Perhaps).

Richmonds list is loaded with "Name Brand" youngsters. Apart from Foley and maybe Deledio, there isn't really much talent on that list whatsoever. Your Top 5 talents from that list would read.
1. Murphy
= Gibbs
3. Kreuzer
4. Foley
5. Simpson

 

[bhorjus]

Carlton just

 

[tiger trooper]

Richmonds list is loaded with "Name Brand" youngsters. Apart from Foley and maybe Deledio, there isn't really much talent on that list whatsoever. Your Top 5 talents from that list would read.
1. Murphy
= Gibbs
3. Kreuzer
4. Foley
5. Simpson

hahaah ROFL.

so ur suggesting gibbs and murphy and kruezer is better than foley?. ROFL

murphy is a champion, no doubt.

But foley would be number 1 on that list. Did muephy get nominated for AA?

 

[beaver fever]

Richmonds list is loaded with "Name Brand" youngsters. Apart from Foley and maybe Deledio, there isn't really much talent on that list whatsoever. Your Top 5 talents from that list would read.
1. Murphy
= Gibbs
3. Kreuzer
4. Foley
5. Simpson

Dude that list is just plain wrong

 

[borgy]

ur joking arnt u mate half of ur players dnt even get a kick deledio>murphy
foley>>gibbs just wait man ull see who has the better team in 3-4 years

I would rather have Murph and Gibbs than those two.

 

[HBK619]

Your Top 5 talents from that list would read.
1. Murphy
= Gibbs
3. Kreuzer
4. Foley
5. Simpson

Oh yeah I agree, Kade Simpson is way better than Deledio, Cotchin, Thursfield, Rance, hell there are more Carlton players that are better than Simpson.

 

[Jeremias]

Oh yeah I agree, Kade Simpson is way better than Deledio, Cotchin, Thursfield, Rance, hell there are more Carlton players that are better than Simpson.

Rance hasn't been given the footballing equivalent of the death sentence by playing for Richmond yet.

Simpson is MUCH better than Thursfield. However, you are a Tugger supporter, so such mistakes are expected from an inbred

 

[RichosGuns]

My 1-5 of each position would be:

Midfielders:
- Foley
- Murphy
- Deledio
- Gibbs
- Simpson

Backman:
- Polak
- Thurstfield
- Conners
- Walker
- Rance

Rucks:
- Kruezer
- Hampson
- Pattison
- Putt
- Graham

Fowards:
- Fisher
- Hughes
- Morton
- Riewoldt
- Betts

Tried to be as impartial as possible

 

[BABYBOMBERS2007]

Neither. Both crap.

 

[parrot]

I didn't vote because the Blues younger player group is about 10-15 talent classes above what the Tiges have, which is overall a complete mess. The only players that are worthwhile on the Tiges list are Deledio, Cotchin, and maybe Riewoldt, although he's a bit slow. The rest are solid middle-of-the-roaders.

 

[HBK619]

I didn't vote because the Blues younger player group is about 10-15 talent classes above what the Tiges have, which is overall a complete mess. The only players that are worthwhile on the Tiges list are Deledio, Cotchin, and maybe Riewoldt, although he's a bit slow. The rest are solid middle-of-the-roaders.

Just keep telling yourself that.

Well you will anyway because you are a Parrot.

 

[richcogs]

1. Hawthorn
2. Richmond
3. Carlton

 

[burto]

I'd take Richmond in a heartbeat

 

[Pie 4 Life]

Richmond. Marginally though.